60 likes | 177 Views
Language proficiency requirements implementation in Finland. LPRI workshop 3.3.2010 Tina El-Nemr. Awareness/promulgation/ legislation. Information about the new requirements and implementation was made available on the CAA Finland website. No mass mailings were carried out.
E N D
Language proficiency requirements implementation in Finland • LPRI workshop 3.3.2010 • Tina El-Nemr
Awareness/promulgation/legislation • Information about the new requirements and implementation was made available on the CAA Finland website. • No mass mailings were carried out. • FI-CAA has not established, and does not demand a minimum language proficiency level for ab initio training.
National implementation • A working group was tasked with the development of a test and the training of raters. These were carried out during the fall of 2007. Roughly a hundred raters were trained and certified by FI-CAA. • National regulations concerning LP requirements were issued 19 Nov 2007. • Existing radiotelephony ratings remain in effect until 17 May 2010 (ANS personnel) or 31 March 2011 (PPL, CPL and ATPL holders). • LP test certificates were required after 5 March 2008. • Glider , balloon and ultralight pilots are exempt, and continue to carry the previous RT ratings.
Tests implemented • IH/08: the primary test used in Finland. The test was developed by the working group consisting of professional pilots, air traffic controllers, english teachers and a language testing expert, as well as CAA representatives. • IH/09: an updated version of IH/08 • ELPAC • Finnair 08: a test developed for Finnair for testing their cockpit crew.
Current status • Roughly 90% of pilots engaged in international operations have been tested. • 100 % of ANS personnel have been tested • 100 authorized raters, all trained directly by the CAA, no third parties involved in training or testing. • In order to improve consistency in testing, only 7 raters are authorized to conduct tests for the initial issue of languge proficiency levels. • All tests for holders of ”old” RT ratings are considered renewals of language proficiency levels.
Difficulties • Developing and validating the test from scratch was challenging. • Lack of awareness on the license holders’ part about the new requirements, especially about who the regulations apply to. • Some unwillingness to participate by the non-professional aviators