The Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

1. The Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team Clare Hadley Co-Chair Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

2. Presentation • Composition of the Team • Remit of the Team • Work Programme • Issues • Next? Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

3. Composition of the Team Laila Aslesen NO Stefan Bjorkhammar  SE Clare Hadley  UK Co-Chair Matti Holopainen FI Ewa Wysocka PL Jens Hollaender  DK Ian Jackson UK Katleen Janssen BE Lea Leskinen  FI Ulrike Menzel AT Chair Michael Rösler-Goy DE Claire Stacino BE Romain Vialle FR Roland-Michael Wagner   DE Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

4. How the Team works • No differences between core and support members of Team • Representatives on interface teams with other DTs • Team has been split to work in smaller task forces Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

5. Remit of the Team • To develop draft data-sharing IRs governing access and rights of use to spatial data sets and services for Community institutions and bodies available for adoption by 2007 • To draft IRs governing third party access to upload services by 2007 • To draft IRs increasing the potential re-use of spatial datasets and services by 2009 Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

6. Deliverables • Report on requirements of Community institutions and bodies (Mar 2006) • Draft IRs for access for Community institutions and bodies (Dec 2006) • Report on requirements of third parties on access to upload services (Mar 2006) • Draft IRs on third party access to upload services (Dec 2006) • Report on requirements of third parties for re-use (Dec 2007) • Report of current best practices and models for data policies (Dec 2007) Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

7. Mission of the Team The Mission of the Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team is to support the establishment of INSPIRE by drafting Implementing Rules on Data and Service Sharing according to the INSPIRE Directive. Along the road the requirements of Community institutions and bodies, the current types of rights, access, and use will be addressed and best practice examples in sharing arrangements and models for data policies will be looked for. The Implementing Rules will create a framework of provisions to enable public authorities and Community bodies to share spatial data and services in order to meet user needs in the domain of environmentally related policies in a sustainable way. Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

8. Public authorities within a MS Publ. auth. between MS Institutions & bodies of the Community Bodies by intern. Agreement Purpose of use Public Task direct or indirect impact on the environment USER Spatial Data Information Annex I-III Reference/Thematic Data Metadata Format, Scale,... INSPIRE DSS DT Restrictions/Obstacles Law Technical Services Law Discovery, View, Download Transformation, Invoke Access EU: Regulations,.. International Agreements National Law Technical Organisational Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

9. Meetings • 3rd/4th October 2005 JRC Ispra / JRC • 14th/15th November 2005 Vienna / BEV • Since then – cooperation has been • predominantly via e-mail • rarely via conference call • with two task force meetings Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

10. First Work Programme (November 2005) • Identify common ground between Commission Proposal and Council Common Position Nov 2005 • Describe working terms and criteria for determining the user requirements of the EU institutions and bodies Feb 2006 • Seek requirements of Community institutions and bodies Feb 2006 • Find best practice examples and create models Mar 2006 • Review and evaluation of examples and models Apr 2006 • Create/develop rules Jun 2006 Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

11. Progress on First Work Programme in Dec 2005/Jan 2006 • Common ground identified between Commission Proposal and Council Common Position • Working terms defined • Criteria drawn up for user requirements research Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

12. Progress (continued) • Provisional list of terms & categories for collecting requirements • Terms and definitions • Already defined terms in the „Council version“ (e.g: spatial data, charging) • Relevant but not defined (e.g: restriction, public task) • Relevant but depend on the political process (e.g. access, point of use) → final INSPIRE directive • Categories e.g.: • Types of data • Types of services • Types of user • Rights of use, types of usage • Procedure • Restrictions Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

13. Progress on First Work Programme in Dec 2005/Jan 2006 • Common ground identified between Commission Proposal and Council Common Position • Working terms defined • Criteria drawn up for user requirements research • Task forces formed to study user requirements of Community institutions and bodies Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

14. Consolidation Team Meeting (February 2006) • Clarification sought on many issues by all Drafting Teams • All Teams trying to do user requirements studies from their own perspective • Commission announced it will do the user requirements study. Delivery date for results not defined. • Criteria for data sharing part of study submitted by DSS DT to Consolidation Team and Commission. Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

15. New Work Programme • Analysis of the current status → ongoing • In the interim: • Continue work on terminology • Draw up process by which user requirements results will be used Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

16. Planned Actions • Task forces on: • Access: types of access, access point + examples • Rights of use: types of usage + examples • Procedure (e.g. application, timeframe, charge, clearinghouse) and restrictions (data protection,..) • Work on interface teams with other DTs • Seek use cases and examples and document them • When user requirements available from Commission study: • Analyse results, produce models and evaluate • Draft implementing rules for data sharing between MS and EU institutions and bodies Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

17. Issues • Moving goalposts • Commission support • Volatile and distinct wording in the 2nd Reading texts Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

18. Clarification sought from Commission • User requirements from EU institutions and bodies • Institutions and bodies of the Community • examples, criteria and rules - which bodies are involved? • Bodies established by international agreements to which the Community and/or MS are party • examples, criteria and rules - which bodies are involved? • Information about INSPIRE Geoportal • access point, data flow, clearinghouse, ... Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

19. Next? • Get on with preparatory work • Wait for user requirements study results • Wait for final Directive text • Looking to SDICs and LMOs for case studies for data sharing arrangements • Workshop between metadata, network services and data and service sharing drafting teams on ‘horizontal services’ (access management, authorisation, licensing etc) Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team

20. Thank You! Data and Service Sharing Drafting Team