1 / 35

SCOPE : the System for Comprehensive Ongoing Preparatio N of Educators

SCOPE : the System for Comprehensive Ongoing Preparatio N of Educators. “USING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT METHODS AT THE CANDIDATE LEVEL” CAEP 2014 SPRING CONFERENCE RICK STANTON. AFFILIATION: University of Missouri -- St. Louis College of Education Office of Educator Effectiveness

tawny
Download Presentation

SCOPE : the System for Comprehensive Ongoing Preparatio N of Educators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCOPE:the SystemforComprehensiveOngoingPreparatioN ofEducators “USING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT METHODS AT THE CANDIDATE LEVEL” CAEP 2014 SPRING CONFERENCE RICK STANTON

  2. AFFILIATION: University of Missouri -- St. Louis College of Education Office of Educator Effectiveness and Accreditation

  3. OFFICE OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS AND ACCREDITATION Established in April 2013 Director: Rick Stanton SCOPE Coordinator: David Barbero Report Coordinator: Debbie Ballard

  4. Overview I will... • share our journey, which is ongoing • illustrate our evolution to a developmental assessment system • envision the future • exchange ideas

  5. Key Players • NCATE  CAEP • MoDESE • Dean Carole Basile • Faculty leadership • AssociateDean Helene Sherman Ann Taylor • Dr. Michael Bahr • Faculty involvement • Committee for Program Quality • Administrative support • Office of Educator Effectiveness and Accreditation (of course!) • Office of Clinical Experience and Partnerships • Primary platform=Foliotek • ...and others

  6. THE Evolution of SCOPE System for Comprehensive Ongoing… Program EnhancementPreparation of Educators • No longer just an “electronic file-cabinet” • Unit Assessment System now has multiple tiers with distinguished targets of development

  7. Goals for the Candidate Tier • Provide Alternative Measure of Candidate Learning • Demonstrate and Foster Candidate Growth (Developmental) • Promote Innovative Practices • Support High Quality Professional Experiences • Gather Evidence of Impact • Candidate’s Impact on Students • College’s Impact on Community • Embrace New State Standards • Missouri Educator Standards • Missouri Standards for Preparation of Educators (MOSPE) • Prepare Candidates for Evaluation after Employment • Missouri Educator Evaluation System (MEES)

  8. Great Leap Forward: Rethinking the Teacher Portfolio • Perfect Timing • New adaptive e-portfolio platform • New set of standards • How can we add value to this instrument and support our goals? • Not a critique of portfolios in general

  9. Meeting our Goals: GOALS Provide Alternative Measure of Candidate Learning Demonstrate and Foster Candidate Growth Formative vs. Summative Developmental Continuum

  10. Meeting our Goals: GOALS Embrace New State Standards Prepare Candidates for Evaluation as Working Educators Standards / Quality Indicators aligned to courses Distinguish addressing vs. assessing Mesh with state assessments (MEGA)

  11. Required Written Evidence in Practicum One and Practicum Two

  12. Example: MEP Summary Page

  13. Example: An MEP Domain Page

  14. Meeting our Goals: GOAL Foster Innovative Practices Low-Stakes (not a degree requirement, nor pass/fail) Candidate-Initiated Evidence

  15. Meeting our Goals: GOALS Support High Quality Professional Experiences Gather Evidence of Impact • Provide guidelines for measuring student impact (when possible) • Differentiate impact from other types of professional experience • Encourage professional guidance over purely academic feedback • Track collective impact in field work

  16. Using the Data Resulting aggregate data is used for program improvement Data is incorporated into a student “dashboard” Candidates complete periodic growth guides (early stages)

  17. Example: Ratings of Teacher Candidates in Practicum One and Practicum Two (counts)

  18. Example: Responses to M.Ed. Exit Survey (averages)

  19. CHANGING THE CULTURE • Focus on usability – Removing the hurdles • Increase faculty/adjunct participation (nudging the holdouts) • Leverage multiple methods of dissemination • Websites, blogs, SEO -- coe.umsl.edu/scope • Course management system • Training sessions • Classroom visits • Promos and flyers

  20. CONNECTING THE DOTS • Integrate SCOPE with other systems • Student data management system • Degree audit system • COE Portal • Increase inter-rater reliability by comparing data to other evaluations and state assessments that are based on the same standards • Clinical teacher evaluations • Field experience observations • and growing…

  21. Taking the “SCOPE Way”College-Wide SCOPE… …will extend to all programs, not just teacher certification. …align to other sets of candidate standards and program goals (standards-based). …can be even more applicable at the graduate level. …can link the “strand” of moving from ‘Candidate’ to ‘Distinguished’ / undergraduate to graduate.

  22. It’s growing: More than 1200 new student accounts in a span of 15 months

  23. Let’s Talk Rick Stanton stantonr@umsl.edu Director Office of Educator Effectiveness and Accreditation College of Education University of Missouri – St. Louis http://gocoe.umsl.edu/caep2014

More Related