1 / 18

IAPT Payment by Results Project Update

IAPT Payment by Results Project Update. David Perton IAPT PbR Project Manager Department of Health. What the Presentation will Cover. The Currency Model The Data Being Collected The Analysis Reporting Timescales The Project Plan The Analysis to be Undertaken

teegan-thornton
Download Presentation

IAPT Payment by Results Project Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IAPT Payment by ResultsProject Update David Perton IAPT PbR Project Manager Department of Health

  2. What the Presentation will Cover The Currency Model The Data Being Collected The Analysis Reporting Timescales The Project Plan The Analysis to be Undertaken What is Outside the Scope of the Feasibility Study

  3. The Draft Outcomes Based Currency Model The five outcome areas are: Equity of Access (15% from 6 measures) Clinical Outcomes & Recovery (50%) Reduced Disability WSAS (10%) Employment Outcomes (10%) Patient Satisfaction and Choice (15%) These outcome areas represent NICE indicated quality standards Evidence Based Practice (EBP) together with IAPT quality standards Practice Based Evidence (PBE) from the analysis of Year one data (see Gyani et al report)

  4. Data Being Gathered from 22 Pilot Sites Patient level activity, outcomes & experience data Demographic & SLA data, to support the Access Domain (by 28th September from commissioners) Fully absorbed cost breakdown by contact and type of intervention (completed 12th October) A sample of Mental Health PbR Care Clusters (end October?)

  5. Patient Level Data Monthly Submissions • IAPT Minimum Data Set (MDS) (50 items) flowed to the Information Centre under the ISB notice. • IAPT Additional PbR Dataset (33 items, e.g. PEQ scores) also flowed to the Information Centre using the same process as the MDS

  6. One Off Data Collection from Pilot Sites • Cost Data • Fully absorbed (i.e. direct, indirect & overheads) • High & Low Intensity • Intensity Mapped to Therapy Type and Staff Role • Hourly Costs • Demographic Prevalence Data • Over 65s • BME • SLA Volume (by Intensity of Therapy) • Mental Health PbR Care Clusters

  7. Analysis Plan: Two Stages • Stage 1 • Based on first 5 month’s data • Informs a discussion paper published mid-December • Informs initial findings (including 2013/14 recommendation) published February 2012 with Final MH PbR Guidance • Stage 2 • Based on all 9-month’s data • Informs final findings published April 2013

  8. Project Plan

  9. Deliverables of the Analysis • Analysis of Cost Recovery • Analysis of the Feasibility of Data Collection • Analysis of the Affordability • Service User Analysis • Lessons Learned Analysis • MH Cluster & Cost Analysis • Demographic Profile • Usage Profile • Case-mix Profile • Referral, Satisfaction, Choice & Outcomes Profile • Work & Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) Analysis

  10. Cost Recovery Analysis Matrix Percentage of currency by month & by provider Measures Variance between providers Variance between commissioners Variance between months (Stability/volatility) Do services performing well recover costs Are services performing poorly incentivised to improve Are there any perverse incentives

  11. Feasibility of Data Collection Measures of Data Quality from Information Centre Measures of Data Completeness Analysis of Lessons Logs from Providers Affordability Compare PbR Payments to Block Contracts

  12. Service Users Not Paid For (less than two sessions) Two Sessions Only No Clinical Improvement or Deterioration Data Completeness of Patient Experience Questionnaires Lessons Learned

  13. Lesson Learned Any Other Lessons from Commissioners & Providers Mental Health Clusters Correlation Between Cluster and IAPT Episode Cost?

  14. Demographic Profile The proportion of the service users that are of working age The proportion that are in the vulnerable age (16-24) in terms of employment outcomes? The proportion of aged 65 and over The proportion of each ethnicity The proportion by gender An Analysis of if any group above is under-represented

  15. Usage Profile The average number of therapy sessions patients have The proportions of High Intensity and Low Intensity therapy sessions Case-Mix Profile By Mental Health Clusters

  16. Referral, Satisfaction, Choice & Outcomes Profile Proportion of patients treated that were below caseness when assessed Proportion of disabled patients treated that were below caseness when assessed Proportion of self-referred patients treated that were below caseness when assessed Proportions of self-referrals, by age, ethnicity, gender and disability Correlation between referral mode and satisfaction Proportion of patients with a preference for treatment option Correlation between clinical improvement/recovery and satisfaction Correlation between clinical improvement/recovery and choice Correlation between clinical improvement/recovery and diagnosis

  17. Work & Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) Disability (initial mean WSAS) Clinical Outcomes (change in mean WSAS) Cost of the Patient Episode (change in mean WSAS)

  18. Not part of the scope of the Project at this stage: Price & Cost Unbundling Incentivising Quality & Outcomes, Beyond Goals What-if Analysis Sensitivity Analysis Changes to elements within domains Changes to proportions assigned to each domain Iterative optimisation Maybe Required if a National Tariff is to be Developed http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/pbr

More Related