240 likes | 385 Views
On the Verge. Prospects for Deep Seabed Mining within a Decade. U.S. Geological Survey January 17, 2013. Caitlyn Antrim Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans. Focus: Outlook for Nodule Development. Ocean- Based Resource Minerals of Interest Nickel Copper Cobalt Manganese
E N D
On the Verge • Prospects for Deep Seabed Mining within a Decade U.S. Geological SurveyJanuary 17, 2013 Caitlyn Antrim Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans
Focus: Outlook for Nodule Development • Ocean- Based Resource • Minerals of Interest • Nickel • Copper • Cobalt • Manganese • Rare Earth Elements • Beyond National Jurisdiction
110ºW-160ºW, 0º-20ºN Metal Content Ni: 1.2-1.4% Cu: 1.0-1.2% Co: 0.25% Mn: 29% REE: 0.08-0.1% Depth: 4000-5500 Meters East Pacific Nodule Field
ISA3 ISA4 ISA2 ISA1 CCZ Inferred Resources
Economics of Deep Sea Nodule Development • At-Sea Capital and Operating Technology Based on Off-Shore Development and Maritime Shipping Industry • On-Land technology based on Nickel Laterite Processing Systems and Ferroalloy Production • Market Prices and Revenues Determined by Land-Based Mineral Sources
Sea System Design • Nodule Harvester • Lift System • Base Vessel • Tailings Return • Sea Transport • Alternative Designs
Combined value of nickel, copper, cobalt and manganese in 2012 $. REE value is not included. Price History: 1982 - 2012
Costs and Revenues • Capital Costs: $2.1 to $3.5 Billion • Operating Costs: $470 million to $600 million • Contained Metal Value, not including REE values (normalized to millions of 2012 US $)
Rare Earths and Deep Seabed Nodules • Nodule assay shows .08% REE Content • Heavy REEs account for 21% of total REE • By Separating Individual REEs, total REE market value is $247/ton • REE Content Could Increase Annual Revenues by $375 to $750 million
Benefits to US of Seabed Nodule Development • Technology leadership in first of three new high seas sources of critical metals • Capital Investment of about $3 billion • Annual Sales about $1.4 to $2.2 billion • 780 direct jobs; 2727 or more total per operation • Significant contribution to critical materials security • Significant improvement in import-export balance • Downstream employment and business benefits will be felt in the Gulf Coast and Ohio River Valley
International Regime:US Objectives in 1982 • Not Deter Development • Assure National Access • Assure and Define a U.S. Decision-Making Role • Allow United States to Block Amendments • Not Set Undesirable Precedents • Resolve Issues Identified as Raising Significant Objections in the Senate
Today’s Investment Climate for Deep Seabed Minerals • Assured Access, Tenure and Title • Rule-based International Regulatory Regime • Dispute Resolution for Investors • Issue: Lack of Recognition of Claims Outside UNCLOS
Isolation of the US fromDeep Seabed Mining • The LOS Convention establishes that: • Claimants must be sponsored by a State Party of their own nationality • Parties to the Convention cannot recognize title to minerals recovered outside the Convention (precluding sale of minerals in international commodity markets) • Exclusive access can only be recognized through the Convention (no “Reciprocating States Agreement” or international legal protection of US claims)
Conclusions • Deep Seabed Nodules are a World-Class Resource of Critical Minerals • Long Term Demand will be driven by industrial development in China, India, Brazil, South Africa and Russia • Future seabed mining will compete against nickel laterite and porphyry copper deposits of declining grade and accessibility • Additional development of hundreds of millions of dollars are needed before full investment • Miners will require international capital and access to commodity markets • US Industry Needs the LOS Convention’s Seabed Regime
Cost Estimates (Million US $)Updated to 2012, Scaled to 3 Million Dry Metric Tons per Year
International Partners • US Companies Can’t “Go It Alone”; Private US Consortia with International Partners in 1989: • Ocean Mining Associates (50% by Belgium and Italy) • Ocean Management Inc. (50.22% by Canada and Japan; Germany takes share in 1990s) • Kennecott Consortium (48% by Canada Japan, UK; Kennecott itself was owned by Rio Tinto Zinc and later by British Petroleum) • Lockheed/Ocean Minerals Co. (Dutch partners in early 1980s)