220 likes | 376 Views
CSICS 26 Oct. 2004. A 49-Gb/s , 7-Tap Transversal Filter in 0.18 m m SiGe BiCMOS for Backplane Equalization Altan Hazneci and Sorin Voinigescu Edward S. Rogers, Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto 10 King’s College Rd., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G4, Canada.
E N D
CSICS 26 Oct. 2004 A 49-Gb/s , 7-Tap Transversal Filter in 0.18 mm SiGe BiCMOS for Backplane EqualizationAltan Hazneci and Sorin Voinigescu Edward S. Rogers, Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto 10 King’s College Rd., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G4, Canada
Outline • Motivation • Transversal Filter Block Diagram • System Simulations • Design Implementation • Test and Measurement Results • Conclusion
Motivation • backplane applications present demanding design challenges for data rates exceeding 10 Gb/s • frequency dependent losses in the backplane limit broadband communication systems • the skin effect and dielectric losses dominate • Intersymbol Interference (ISI) • enabling chip-to-chip communication over 30-cm of backplane at 40 Gb/s and over 12-cm long controlled impedance lines at 100 Gb/s (future) • enabling intercabinet communication over in-expensive cable
Transversal Filter • analog Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter • Feed Forward Equalizer (FFE) • continuous time implementation (high speed operation)
System Simulations • the following FFE configurations were evaluated using MATLAB: • 2 to 7 taps • baud rate spaced a tap spacing = T (symbol period) • fractionally spaced a tap spacing = T/2 or T/4 • 40 Gb/s operation over (a) 30-cm long 50-W microstrip transmission line on MICROLAM substrate (b) 9-ft section of cable (RG-174) • assume TEM mode operation (i.e. no modal dispersion)
Number of Taps vs Tap Spacing • in simulation 2 taps enough to open the eye for the 3 different tap spacings • 25-ps tap spacing did not appear to benefit from more than 2-taps • additional taps, for 12.5-ps & 6.25-ps tap spacing, increased the recovered eye amplitude • 7-tap, 6.25-ps tap spacing most versatile • can be configured as a 2-tap FFE w/ 25-ps tap spacing • can be configured as a 4-tap FFE w/ 12.5-ps tap spacing
SiGe HBTs • fabricated in Jazz Semiconductor's SBC18, 0.18 µm SiGe BiCMOS technology • SiGe HBTs with fT and fMAX values of 160 GHz • peak fT bias current density: 1.2-mA/mm (IC/le), VBE = 0.9-V
Gain Stage • core of each gain stage is a Gilbert cell • tail current of the differential pair controls the tap weight (gain pad) • sp/n pads control the tap sign
Test & Measurement • the circuit was biased from a single 5-V power supply and drew 150 mA at the nominal tap settings suitable for operation as a distributed amplifier • a custom board provided bias and control signals to set the tap signs and weights • 7 programmable current sources (tap weights) + 1 current sink (emitter follower bias) • 9 programmable voltage sources; tap sign (7), sign reference (1), input bias (1) • the board was controlled via a laptop running a Matlab GUI.
Measured Tap Spacing • phase response of each tap to a 10 GHz sinusoidal signal • average tap spacing 8-ps, 48-ps total delay
Measured FFE Output 40-Gb/s 43-Gb/s 49-Gb/s 48-Gb/s • equalization over 9-ft SMA cable (3 x 3-ft)
49‑Gb/s FFE • measured 49 Gb/s input eye after 6.5-ft SMA cable (left) and equalized output eye (right)
Conclusion • described the design and experimental characterization of a 7-tap feed forward equalizer operating above 40 Gb/s • the circuit architecture is based on a transversal filter topology with on-chip microstrip transmission lines • the performance was verified up to 49 Gb/s (upper data rate limit of the BERT) using a 231-1 PRBS signal over a 6.5-ft SMA cable • the FFE significantly reduces ISI and produces an open eye at the output despite having a totally closed input eye at 40 and 49 Gb/s
Acknowledgements • Timothy Dickson for his invaluable help with setting up measurements • Quake Technologies for access to their 43.5Gb/s BERT and characterization lab • Marco Racanelli and Paul Kempf of Jazz Semiconductor • This work was financially supported by Jazz Semiconductor, Gennum Corporation, and by Micronet
Gain Stage Features • the cascode differential pair is buffered by two emitter-follower (EF) stages • tail currents of the emitter-follower stages are partially controlled by the diff pair tail current • resistive padding and local bias decoupling carefully designed to avoid any negative resistance in the emitter-follower stages and in the cascode stage • 6-mA diff pair tail current a peak fT current density of a single transistor in the diff pair • EF stages biased at 0.5-0.75 times peak fT current density to prevent instability • 5-V supply voltage, 21-mA nominal bias current (max gain)
On-Chip Microstrip Delay Lines • top-metal lines over metal-2 ground planes • 12-mm wide a Z0= 50-W • 500-mm long a 3-ps; one section in input path and one in output path for a total delay of 6-ps • input and output end sections are 250-mm long • why metal-2 ground planes? answer: metal-1 used to route control signals; ground plane provides isolation • multi-metal ground planes between adjacent transmission lines improves isolation; also ensures simultaneous single-ended and differential matching is maintained • serpentine microstrip layout to minimize the area • microstrip transmission lines in the output path also combine the weighted outputs of each tap
Eye Diagram Measurements • the circuit was operated single-endedly and the unused ports were terminated off chip • equalization was obtained by manually adjusting the gain and sign of the 7 taps through the Matlab GUI • eye diagrams were measured on die, using an Anritsu MP1801A 43.5-Gb/s BERT and an Agilent 786100A DCA with the 86118A 70-GHz dual remote sampling head and external timebase • operation up to 49-Gb/s (beyond the factory-specified range of the BERT) was verified by applying a 231-1 PRBS signal to the input of the equalizer through a 16-dB power attenuator and a section of SMA cable