1 / 11

CAeM-XIV TECO 'The Future of Aviation Meteorology - Evolution or Revolution?‘

CAeM-XIV TECO 'The Future of Aviation Meteorology - Evolution or Revolution?‘ Day 1 sub-theme: Ensuring the quality of Aeronautical MET Day 2 sub-theme: Future Developments in Aeronautical MET. What we want you to do…. We will split you in to 4 groups You have a flip chart and marker pens

terah
Download Presentation

CAeM-XIV TECO 'The Future of Aviation Meteorology - Evolution or Revolution?‘

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAeM-XIV TECO 'The Future of Aviation Meteorology - Evolution or Revolution?‘ Day 1 sub-theme: Ensuring the quality of Aeronautical MET Day 2 sub-theme: Future Developments in Aeronautical MET

  2. What we want you to do… • We will split you in to 4 groups • You have a flip chart and marker pens • Your group has one hour to discuss the issues raised during the session presentations • Prepare a 5-10 minute presentation on your group’s discussions • Elect a spokesperson or spokespeople to present • We’ll provide a facilitator just in case!

  3. Break-out Groups • Africa, South America and Australasia - Facilitator, Jeff Wilson • Asia - Facilitator, CM Shun • RAIV& RAVI west - Facilitator, Carr McLeod • RAVI east - Facilitator, Herbert Puempel

  4. Friday 5th February Afternoon • Quality Management  (Shakeer Baig, Trinidad and Tobago) - 10 minutes • Aeronautical Forecaster and Observer Standards (Ian Lisk, UK) - 30 minutes • Breakout session (approx 15 per group) then coffee - 1 hour • Presentation to plenary by breakout groups (5-10 minutes per group ~ 45 minutes total)

  5. QMS - please consider… • How difficult has QMS implementation been in your service? Or… • What plans does your service have for QMS implementation? • What are or have been the issues associated with the above? • What kind/type of assistance is required through WMO?

  6. AMP Competence - please consider… • What do you think about the EC-LXI proposed definition of a WMO Meteorologist? • How much assessment of aeronautical MET personnel competence is currently being done in your MET service? • How do you think your MET service will go about implementing a competency assessment framework? • What do you think of WMO’s proposals to assist with implementation and compliance?

  7. Saturday 6th February Terminal Area (am): • New Terminal Forecast (Cyndie Abelman, US and Stephanie Desbios, France) - 45 minutes • TAF Verification (Queenie Lam, HK,China) - 15 minutes

  8. ‘NTF’ - please consider… • What is your perception/interpretation of what the NTF objective is? • Is there a demand/need (as opposed to a requirement) for the NTF? • How should we go about better understanding the user needs, indeed should we? • What visualisation format should the NTF take? • Given the above, what should we call it?

  9. TAF Verification - please consider… • How can TAF verification measure the ‘usefulness’ of a TAF from a user perspective? • Is it possible to accurately verify the probabilistic and TEMPO parameters given in a TAF? • Why does TAF verification matter? • What kind/type of assistance is required through WMO? • Should we be looking at the structure/format of the current TAF?

  10. Saturday 6th February Session Chair, Ian Lisk, UK Regionalised MET service provision (pm): • SIGMET Provision (Sue O'Rourke, Australia) - 15 minutes • SESAR (Doug Johnson, UK) - 15 minutes • NextGen (Cyndie Abelman, US) - 15 minutes • Potential impacts on Air Navigation MET Service Providers in other regions (Gaborekwe Khambule, RSA) - 15 minutes

  11. Regionalised ANMSP - please consider • What are your views on a more regionalised model for SIGMETs? • How is CAeM ‘relevant’ to regionalised ATM programmes such as SESAR and NextGen? • What do you expect to be the impact of regionalised ATM programmes on ANMSP? • What do you expect to be the overall impact on individual NMSs?

More Related