250 likes | 450 Views
The Energy Challenge. CONTEXT. SCALE. Humanity’s Top 10 Problems for Next 50 Years. CONTEXT: The Nobel Laureate’s View. Energy Water Food Environment Poverty Terrorism and War Disease Education Democracy Population. Richard E. Smalley, “Our Energy Challenge”.
E N D
The Energy Challenge CONTEXT SCALE
Humanity’s Top 10 Problems for Next 50 Years CONTEXT: The Nobel Laureate’s View • Energy • Water • Food • Environment • Poverty • Terrorism and War • Disease • Education • Democracy • Population Richard E. Smalley, “Our Energy Challenge”
CONTEXT: The “Miller Lite” Summary More energy, less CO2 “Tastes great, less filling” SCALE: How much more energy? How much less CO2? How long? What new technology? What new infrastructure?
Energy Summary Energy is one of the Grand Challenges of our time Energy is not a monolithic issue supply, demand,conservation, application, scale, location, independence, environment, climate change, GDP, carbon intensity, infrastructure, technology, policy, sustainability, public acceptance… Fossil fuels will be important throughout this century Renewables are growing rapidly, but from a very small base Efficiency/conservation has the best payback Each barrel of oil saved keeps $ in our pockets and ~1000 pounds of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere! BUT we cannot save our way to meeting the world’s future energy needs.
Energy – World Scale Dimensions 1 exajoule (EJ) = 10 Joules 1 Quadrillion BTU (Quad) = 10 BTU 1 Terawatt (TW)=10 Gigawatts=10 Megawatts=10 kilowatts 18 15 3 6 9 1 TWyr ≈ 30 Quads ≈ 30 EJ World energy consumption ≈ 400 Quads/yr US Energy Consumption ≈ 100 Quads/yr Energy content of 1 cubic foot of natural gas = 1000 BTU Energy content of 1 gallon of gasoline = 125,000 BTU US daily consumption: 20 million barrels of oil 60 billion cubic feet of natural gas 3 million tons of coal
“We are not going to have energy independence as long as the US relies on the internal combustion engine.” James R. Schlesinger former Secretary of Energy
Coal use will increase under any foreseeable scenario because it is cheap and abundant. CO2 capture and sequestration is the critical enabling technology that would reduce CO2 emissions significantly while also allowing coal to meet the world’s pressing energy needs.” - MIT report, “The Future of Coal” March 2007 Renewables will not play a large role in primary power generation unless/until: –technological/cost breakthroughs are achieved, or –unpriced externalities are introduced (e.g., environmentally driven carbon taxes) Nate Lewis, Caltech http://nsl.caltech.edu/energy.html
US Energy Mix Electricity Generation (~40% of total): 50% Coal, 18% Natural gas, 3% Petroleum Transportation Fuels (~30 % of total): 96% Petroleum Very little overlap between energy sources for these two dominant sectors!
World Energy Statistics and Projections + 1.6%/yr - 1.0%/yr N. S. Lewis and D. G. Nocera, PNAS, 103, 15729 (2006)
Supply Perspective: At minimum, we need to triple global energy supply in this century.
Total Primary Power vs. Year 1990: 12 TW 2050: 28 TW http://nsl.caltech.edu/energy.html
More Energy, but Less CO2 World in 2100 will need: 3X current energy production <1/3 current CO2 emissions = 10X less CO2 emitted per unit of energy used
Carbon-Free Primary Power Need http://nsl.caltech.edu/energy.html
= 7.4GtC = 1.9GtC
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) @ Summit on America’s Energy Future 3/13/08 http://www7.nationalacademies.org/energysummit/bingaman_summit_ppt.pdf
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) @ Summit on America’s Energy Future 3/13/08 http://www7.nationalacademies.org/energysummit/bingaman_summit_ppt.pdf
Potential of Renewable Energy Resources • Wind • - Has potential to meet a large fraction of electricity needs • - Reliability, storage, transmission issues • Solar • -Has potential to meet a significant fraction of electricity needs • - Suitable for distributed generation • - Reliability, storage issues • Biomass • - Has potential to replace fraction of petroleum for transportation • - Questionable energy benefit for corn ethanol • - Land and water issues, competition with food production
There is no single energy source or technology that will “solve” our energy and environmental needs We need to develop a range of technologies to fuller potential Technology alone is likely not enough Efficiency/conservation has the best payback BUT we cannot save our way to meeting the world’s future energy needs.