40 likes | 55 Views
Addressing issues in TSG structure to enhance collaboration, reduce meeting times, and improve workload distribution for effective standard development.
E N D
Existing problems Masami YABUSAKI
Organization • Liaison correspondence takes long time because the corresponding WGs are held during separate dates. • TSG plenaries period is long (two weeks) because TSG-SA plenary is held after TSG-CN/RAN plenaries. This causes the inefficient information exchange between delegates in each company. • TSG structure is not suited to the actual WG correlation. For example, even though SA2 work is most correlated to CTs, SA2 is involved in TSG-SA while CTs are involved in TSG-CT. • All stage 1 works are done in SA1. Entire stage 2 works done in SA2 while radio access part stage 2 are done in RAN2. This causes an inefficiency of stage1 and 2 works. Stage 1 works can be split to radio specific one, core-network specific one, etc.?
Procedure • Workload between chairman and vice chairmen are not adequate. Chairman is overloaded while vice chairmen’s role is low. • All submitted contributions cannot be covered within a meeting because the meeting days are assumed less than 1 weekdays • No workload estimation is done when WI set was selected. This causes long release period.
Process • Liaison correspondence takes long time because the corresponding WGs are held during separate dates. • TSG plenaries period is long (two weeks) because TSG-SA plenary is held after TSG-CN/RAN plenaries. This causes the inefficient information exchange between delegates in each company. • WI deadline is late. This causes long release period. • Working process for each WI (Working turn and correlation between the relevant WG) is not sufficiently scheduled.