1 / 35

An Accurate Assessment of the Situation Determining a Community’s Wastewater Needs

An Accurate Assessment of the Situation Determining a Community’s Wastewater Needs. Nick Haig- University of Minnesota Onsite Sewage Treatment Program haigx003@umn.edu - 612-625-9797. What is a site assessment?. Analyze records Determine lot size Locate well Probe existing system

thais
Download Presentation

An Accurate Assessment of the Situation Determining a Community’s Wastewater Needs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Accurate Assessment of the SituationDetermining a Community’s Wastewater Needs Nick Haig- University of Minnesota Onsite Sewage Treatment Program haigx003@umn.edu - 612-625-9797

  2. What is a site assessment? • Analyze records • Determine lot size • Locate well • Probe existing system • Conduct soil boring • Match soils • Determine seasonal water table depth • Locate potential drainfield area • Identify treatment options • Check/pump septic tank

  3. Inspection: Results • Certificate of compliance • Certificate of non-compliance • Imminent Threat to Public Health System (ITPHS) • Local policies affect results and homeowner requirements! BUYER BEWARE!

  4. What about a whole community?

  5. MPCA Unsewered Area Alternative Analysis • Replace failed ISTS with new ISTS. • Decentralized cluster system. • Connect to existing facility. • Connect to a facility, which requires an expansion. • Construct a new wastewater and treatment facility. Note: Solution may be a combination of approaches

  6. Typical assessment: Complying & Non-complying More complete assessment: Complying & ‘Could be’ Complying & ‘Can’t be’ Complying Determining ‘Decentralized’ Feasibility

  7. Typical Assessment Minnesota Lake Comply Don’t Comply

  8. More Complete Assessment Minnesota Lake Could Comply Comply Can’t Comply

  9. Map of parcels Records: Permits Age of systems Maintenance Identify: Likely compliant Spot check Properties to be checked: No records Possible un-permitted work Older than XX years Suspected problems Map of findings Doing the more complete assessment

  10. Septic System Components Source Well Tank Drainfield Treatment in Soil 3 feet Groundwater

  11. Site Assessments: Soil Analysis

  12. Inadequate Vertical Separation Source Well Tank Drainfield Inadequate Treatment Groundwater Pathogens Nutrients 3 feet

  13. Mound System Source Mound Treatment Area Well Tank Pump Treatment in Soil 3 feet Groundwater

  14. What Kind of System is Bad (failing)? • Leaky Tanks • Surfacing to Ground • Inadequate Vertical Separation to Water Table • Direct Discharge

  15. Drywells or Cesspools

  16. Surfacing to the ground

  17. Direct Discharge (to surface, tile line, or body of water)

  18. Veseli • Examined the records • Conducted 62 Site Evaluations • Determined the current status of systems • Assessed potential solutions for each property • Evaluated potential cluster sites • Produced map of findings • County cost for time, travel, reporting and some overhead - $76.90/site

  19. Results

  20. Possible Results • “In Compliance”- Meets current Rice Co. Ordinance • “Not In Compliance”- Does not meet current Rice County Ordinance, may need to be upgraded in the future • “Imminent Threat to Public Health System”- ground surface or surface water discharge, sewage backup into dwelling, drywell or cesspool.

  21. Results • 60 Anticipated Site Evaluations • 62 Final Site Evaluations • About 60% of community needed to be inspected because of: • No records • Unpermitted work • Suspected direct discharges • Several homes have been upgraded since 1992 due to Rice County Septic Ordinance property transfer requirements

  22. Actual Results

  23. Public Health Threats- Stacked Up

  24. Veseli- Overall Septic Situation 106 Buildings

  25. Veseli- Overall Septic Compliance

  26. Community Options(in no particular order) • Regionalize to Lonsdale (2002 est. = $30,000) • One “decentralized” collection/treatment system for entire community • Several “cluster” collection/treatment systems for entire community • Upgrade all “non-compliant” systems with ISTS and cluster those that cannot fit ISTS

  27. Options (cont.) • Upgrade systems that pose ITPH with ISTS and cluster where necessary • Allow new developments but require them to provide wastewater treatment for existing lots currently not in compliance

  28. Site Evaluation Conclusions

  29. Site Evaluation Cost Estimates * $76.90/ Site Evaluation

  30. Beaver Lake Individual “standard” system Individual “other” system or a holding tank Individual holding tank Cluster system

  31. Costs- Beaver Lake • $500 to local ISTS professional • In Kind not counted • $3000-$5000 estimated

  32. Meriden

  33. More complete assessment • Offers a complete understanding of the current situation • Basis to look at potential solutions • Helps determine appropriate boundaries • Fits with the funding hierarchy changes

More Related