1 / 6

Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X

Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X. Jim Kerby, Fermilab for the Project X Design Group. Project Requirements (1). The current conceptual design of the transfer line from the 8 GeV H- linac to the Recycler injection straight section utilizes the following magnetic elements:

thanos
Download Presentation

Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X Jim Kerby, Fermilab for the Project X Design Group

  2. Project Requirements (1) • The current conceptual design of the transfer line from the 8 GeV H- linac to the Recycler injection straight section utilizes the following magnetic elements: • 72 arc dipoles • 3 required to ramp to ~500 gauss at 5 Hz for linac dump switch • 69 run DC at a field of ~500 gauss • 4 vertical dipoles at a DC field of ~500 gauss • 45 quads in arc and straight which run on F and D bus at an integrated gradient of 1.3 to 1.6T • 20 independently controlled quads with integrated gradients between 1 and 4T. • 30 -35 Horizontal correctors with maximum integrated field of ~0.017T-m • 30-35 Vertical correctors with maximum integrated field of ~ 0.009T-m • For the present configuration, Project X has two options for the transfer line magnetic elements: 1) new permanent magnets and 2) re-use PEP II HER magnets.

  3. Project Requirements (2) • Configuration uncertainty. • For CD-1 (currently anticipated Oct. 2010) the DoE order 413.3a requires the consideration of alternative designs to meet the mission need. • This investigation could result in a lower energy linac, a new synchrotron, and multiple beam lines all yet undefined. • Depending on the siting of such a facility, the required fields and gradients could exceed the specifications for the PEP-II magnets and/or require additional LCW systems for the Al conductor magnets. • Until the Project X configuration is finalized for CD-1, i.e. linac energy and transfer line layout, FNAL cannot commit to a definite plan for procurement of PEP-II magnets.

  4. ICD Configuration

  5. Component Requests • Based upon the current conceptual design of the transfer line and the magnetic requirements, the following is a list of PEP-II items that could potentially fulfill the project’s requirements. • 86 HER main dipoles • 76 for the arc and vertical bend • 10 for spares • 73 HER 4Q22 quads • 65 for transport line • 8 for spares • 40 HER Horizontal correctors • 40 HER Vertical correctors • We cannot use any of the vacuum chambers • If the linac energy remains 8 GeV and the permanent magnet option is selected, Project X is still interested in 6 of the HER dipoles (3 installed + 3 spares) and the correctors.

  6. Scheduling • We would like to complete low field measurements on a few magnets in advance of CD-1. Details of the measurements to be worked out. • We will determine the preliminary list of requested magnets by CD-1. • We will finalize the list of requested magnets by CD-2. • We will be in a position to start accepting magnets following CD-3. • The current Project X working schedule (not officially accepted by DOE at this time) shows: • CD-0 in July 2009 • CD-1 in December 2010 • CD-2 in July 2012 • CD-3 in August 2013 • the beginning of the installation task starting fall of 2016.

More Related