850 likes | 928 Views
Production of radioisotopes: where it all begins!. Thomas J. Ruth TRIUMF Vancouver, Canada. Radiochemical tracers. Probe biochemical systems by labeling compounds with known biological behavior. Tracer Principle.
E N D
Production of radioisotopes: where it all begins! Thomas J. Ruth TRIUMF Vancouver, Canada
Radiochemical tracers Probe biochemical systems by labeling compounds with known biological behavior.
Tracer Principle • Tracer behaves in a similar way to the components of the system to be probed. • Tracer does not alter the system in any measurable fashion. • Tracer concentration can be measured.
Specific Activity • Radioactivity per mass – MBq/mmole • To maintain tracer priniciple must have the highest SA possible. • 370 MBq @ 370 GBq /mmole = 1014 molecules
Sources of radioisotopes: Naturally occurring – 235U Fission – 99Mo 99mTc Neutron capture – 186Re Charged particle – 123I
Radioisotope production is truly Alchemy where you change one element into another!
Choice of method The best possibility for achieving high SA is through charged particle reactions.
Notation 185Re + n = 186Re + g 185Re(n,g)186Re 18O + p = 18F + n 18O(p,n)18F
R = Ins (1 – e-lt) Where R – production rate I – beam flux s – cross section (1 – e-lt) – saturation factor
Parameters • target construction • target constituents • irradiation conditions • energy • current • temperature • pressure • dose • optimize yield and specific activity
[11C]CO2 • small volume aluminum targets • O2 may or may not be added • H. J. Ache, A.P. Wolf, Radiochim. Acta Vol 6, p32, 1966 • primary products are CN and CO at low dose (<0.1 eV/molecule) • higher doses radiolytically oxidize these to CO2 • typical dose 150 eV/molecule
[11C]CH4 • initial work to produce HCN in target required flow-thru quartz body due to dose dependence and CN reactivity. • large aluminum or small nickel targets reported to work well. • D.R. Christman et al. Int. J. App. Rad. Isot., Vol. 26, p435, 1975. • G.-J. Meyer et al. Radiochimica Acta, Vol. 50, p43, 1990.
[11C]CH4 • Reaction Pathway protons N2 + H2 11C + N2 + H2 11CN 11CN + H2 HCN HCN CH4 + NH3 radiolysis
[11C]CH4 at TRIUMF • initial results with cylindrical target, 5% H2 very poor (30% theoretical) • conical target, 10% H2 (50% theoretical) • NH3 in equilibrium & only dependent on amount of H2 • residual fields show 11C produced but not extracted in gas phase • Recently have starting using Nb target chamber with excellent yields
[18F]HF • first water target was Kilbourn et al. Int. J. Appl. Rad. Isot. Vol. 35, p599, 1984. • target materials, titanium, silver, nickel, gold, plated • A.D. Roberts et al. NIM B99, p797, 1995. • C. E. Gonzalez Lepara & B. Dembowski, Appl. Rad. Isot. Vol. 48, p613, 1997.
[18F]F2 • An 18O2 Target for the Production of [18F]F2 R. J. Nickles, M.E. Daube, and T.J. Ruth, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. Vol. 35, p117, 1984 • experience with 20Ne(d,a)18F + carrier 19F2 • subsequent irradiations > theoretical • target wall acting as a holding pool for F • NiF2 on target walls is not passive • proton-only accelerators & 3x yield
Non-reactive gases (CF4, NF3,…) Atomic flourine F Molecular flourine F2 NiF2 target surface Nickles’ 4 Compartment Model k6 k7 k2 k1 k3 k5 k4
Two-shot Method • target evacuated • O2 released to target and irradiated • O2 cryotrapped out • target evacuated with mech. pump • target loaded with 20-200umole F2 + inert gas (Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) • 18F2 released from target via isotopic exchange
[18F]F2 • several reports of single and double shot production methods implemented • reported use of aluminum target bodies in 1991 by Bida et al. • Proc. of IVth Int. Workshop on Targetry and Target Chemistry. • Development of an improved target for [18F]F2 production. A.D. Roberts, T.R. Oakes, and R.J. Nickles Applied Rad. Isot. Vol. 46, p87, 1995
[18F]F2 • advantages of aluminum: • stability • passivation • activation • machinability • cost
[18F]F2 yield vs. 19F2 conc. mmol 19F2 Electrophilic 18F from a Siemens 11MeV Proton-only Cyclotron Chirakal et al. Nucl. Med. Biol. Vol. 22, p111, 1994.
[18F]F2 yield vs. Irradiation time A.D. Roberts, T.R. Oakes, R.J. Nickles Development of an improved target for [18F]F2 production. App. Rad. Isot. Vol. 46, p87, 1995.
[18F]F2 • Proton Irradiation of [18O]O2: Production of [18F]F2 and [18F]F2 + [18F]OF2 A. Bishop, N. Satyamurthy, G. Bida, G. Hendry, M. Phelps, J.R. Barrio Nucl. Med. Biol. Vol. 23, p189, 1996 • targets of aluminum, copper, gold plated copper, nickel, cone and cylinders • single and two shot • multiple recoveries
Multiple Recoveries • A. Bishop et al., Nucl. Med. Biol. Vol. 23, p189, 1996
Choice of Production Method • the threshold energy for initiating the reaction • the energy where the maximum cross section is found • the physical properties of the target material • the physical properties of the product
Choice of Production Method -continued • the chemical properties of the target • the chemical properties of the product • the ease of separation of the product and target • and the ability of converting the product into a useful labeling form.
In Target Chemistry? For a 15 cm target at 10 atm N2 and a 10.5 MeV proton beam.. Heselius, Abo Akademi
Ep= 13.0 MeV P0= 300 psi Havar window
90% Thick Ep= 13.0 MeV P0= 300 psi Havar window
75% Thick Ep= 13.0 MeV P0= 300 psi Havar window
50% Thick Ep= 13.0 MeV P0= 300 psi 4.2 MeV Havar window
He cooling foil from TR13 Target Note heat mark
Water Cooled Grid Target Roberts & Barnhart, U. Wisc.
Accelerator Production of High Specific Activity Therapeutic Radionuclides: Production of High LET Radioisotopes at TRIUMF-ISACThomas J. RuthUBC/TRIUMF PET Program