Fallacies

1. Fallacies Flaws in the Structure of an Argument

2. What are fallacies? • Fallacies are defects in an argument that cause it to be invalid, unsound, or weak. • Fallacies can be separated into two general groups: formal and informal.

3. Formal Fallacies • Formal fallacies are only found in deductive arguments. • Deductive arguments are supposed to be air-tight. • For a deductive argument to be valid, it must be absolutely impossible for both its premises to be true and its conclusion to be false.

4. Formal Fallacies • The classic example of a deductively valid argument is: • 1. All men are mortal. (premise) • 2. Socrates is a man. (premise) • 3. Therefore Socrates is mortal. (guaranteed conclusion) • It is simply not possible that both (1) and (2) are true and (3) is false, so this argument is deductively valid.

5. Formal Fallacies • Any deductive argument that fails to meet this very highstandard commits a logical error, and so, technically, is fallacious. • This includes many arguments that we would usually accept as good arguments, arguments that make their conclusions highly probable but not certain.

6. Formal Fallacies • Example of a deductive argument with a formal fallacy: 1. All humans are mammals. (premise)2. All cats are mammals. (premise)3. All humans are cats. (conclusion) • Both premises in this argument are true but the conclusion is false. The defect is a formal fallacy and can be demonstrated by reducing the argument to its bare structure: 1. All A are C2. All B are C3. All A are B

7. The Problem of Conclusiveness in an Argument • Real-world arguments address contestable issues of truth and value that cannot be resolved with mathematical certainty. • Disputants can create only more or less persuasive arguments, never conclusive ones.

8. The Problem of Conclusiveness in an Argument

9. Informal Fallacies • They are flaws in the structure of an argument. • They sometimes make flawed reasoning seem deceptively persuasive.

10. Why Study Informal Fallacies? • Knowledge of informal fallacies is most useful when we run across arguments that we “know” are wrong, but we cannot quite say why. • Knowledge of informal fallacies can help you locate specific weaknesses in others’ arguments . . . and in your own!

11. Informal Fallacies: Three Categories • Fallacies of Pathos • Fallacies of Ethos • Fallacies of Logos

12. Fallacies of Pathos • Rest on flaws in the way an argument appeals to the audience’s emotions and values • Argument to the People • Appeal to Ignorance • Appeal to Popularity • Appeal to Pity • Red Herring

13. Argument to the PeopleAppeal to Stirring Symbols • Appeal to the fundamental beliefs, biases, and prejudices of the audience in order to sway opinion through a feeling of solidarity among those of a group.

14. Argument to the PeopleAppeal to Stirring Symbols • The stirring symbol of the American flag • Allegiance to nationalistic values • Solidarity of American citizens • Ex: Joe Politician delivering a speech while wearing a suit made out material patterned with the American flag. • Ex: Marilyn Manson wiping his butt on an American flag.

15. Appeal to Ignorance • Presenting assumptions, assertions, or evidence that the audience is incapable of examining or judging. • In other words, maintaining that because a claim has not been disproved, it must be true.

16. Appeal to Ignorance • Ex: Researchers have not conclusively shown that there is no monster at the bottom of Loch Ness; therefore, we should expect to see the monster at any time. • Ex: There must be intelligent life on other planets. No one has proven that there isn’t.

17. Appeal to Ignorance • Ex: Genetically modified organisms must be dangerous to our health because science has not proved that they are safe. • Ex: Jones must have used steroids to get those bulging muscles because he cannot prove that he has not used steroids.

18. Appeal to PopularityThe Bandwagon Appeal • The argument rests on the assertion that since everybody else is doing something, you should do it too. • These appeals are fallacious because the popularity of something is irrelevant to its actual merits. • These appeals are common in advertising where the claim that a product is popular substitutes for evidence of the product’s excellence.

19. Appeal to PopularityThe Bandwagon Appeal • Ex: All the popular, cool kids have tattoos; therefore, I should get a tattoo. • Ex: Everybody who has a Facebook page has a lot of friends; therefore, I should make a Facebook page.

20. Appeal to PopularityThe Bandwagon Appeal • Ex: Living together before marriage is the right thing to do because most couples are now doing it. • Ex: You should buy a Toyota Camry because itis the best-selling car in the world.

21. Appeal to Pity • The arguer appeals to the audience’s sympathetic feelings in order to support a claim that should be decided on more relevant or objective grounds.

22. Appeal to Pity • Ex: “Professor Rose, I’m sorry I couldn’t finish my essay. You don’t understand how difficult my life is right now. My parents could not afford to send me to college, and I have to work two part-time jobs to pay for my classes and books.”

23. Appeal to Pity • Ex: “Honorable Judge, I should not be fined $250 for driving 85 mph in a 25 mph zone because I was distraught from hearing the news of my brother’s illness and was rushing to see him in the hospital.”

24. Red Herring • Refers to the practice of throwing an audience off track by raising an unrelated or irrelevant point. • The name derives from the practice of using a red herring (a very smelly fish) to throw dogs off from a scent that they are supposed to be tracking.

25. Red Herring • Ex: Jack’s girlfriend asks, “Where were you last night?” Jack answers, “I sure am glad to see you. You look extra beautiful today!” • Ex: Question to politician, “What’s your stand on gun control?” Politician’s reply, “I’m for family values.”

26. Red Herring • Ex: I don’t believe we should elect this candidate because she would have to put her children in daycare.

27. Fallacies of Ethos • Fallacies of Ethos = Rest on a flawed relationship between the argument and the character of those involved in the argument. • Often these fallacies attack character or use character instead of evidence for proof.

28. Appeal to False Authority • The arguer appeals to the authority of a popular person rather than a knowledgeable one. • Many advertisements are based on this fallacy. • Testimony to support an argument should come from a person competent in the field.

29. Appeal to False Authority • Kobe Bryant says that Wheaties cereal keeps him on his game; therefore, Wheaties cereal is a good cereal. • Real evidence about the quality of Wheaties cereal would include specific information about its nutritional content rather than testimony from a hired athlete.

30. Appeal to False Authority • Tom Cruise says that postpartum depression can be best treated with vitamins because anti-depressant drugs are dangerous. Therefore, all women who claim they have postpartum depression should stop taking anti-depressants and start taking vitamins.

31. Ad HominemAppeal to the person • Arguments that attack the character of the arguer rather than the argument itself • Name-calling (referring to a disputant by unsavory names) • Appeal to prejudice (applying ethnic, racial, gender, or religious slurs to an opponent) • Guilt by association (linking the opposition to extremely unpopular groups or causes) • Poisoning the Well (discrediting an opponent or an opposing view in advance)

32. Ad HominemAppeal to the person • Name-calling • Ex: OJ Simpson claims that he is innocent, but he’s a wife beater. • Ex: Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy magazine, has argued against the censorship of pornography. But Hefner is an immature, self-indulgent millionaire who never outgrew the adolescent fantasies of his youth. His argument is worthless.

33. Ad HominemAppeal to the person • Appeal to prejudice • Ex: Because he is extremely wealthy, our mayor cannot properly represent this city. • Ex: Of course she is in favor of Affirmative Action. What do you expect from a black woman?

34. Ad HominemAppeal to the person • Guilt by Association • Ex: Of course you support medical marijuana. All of your friends are a bunch of pot-head hippies. • Ex: Professor Smith has argued against the theory of evolution. But he’s a member of the Communist Bikers’ Association. I refuse to listen to him!

35. Ad HominemAppeal to the person • Poisoning the Well • Ex: You are told, prior to meeting him, that your friend’s boyfriend is a poseur and a mooch. When you meet him, everything you hear him say is tainted. • Ex: Before I leave the floor to the next speaker, I must remind you that persons who oppose my plan do not have the best interests of the working people in their hearts.

36. Straw Man • Greatly oversimplifying an opponent’s argument in order to make it easier to refute or ridicule • Diverts attention from the real issue

37. Straw Man • Ex: You many think that levying confiscatory taxes on homeless people’s cardboard dwellings is the surest way out of a recession, but I don’t. • Ex: While my opponent would like to empty our prisons of serial killers, I hold to the sacred principles of compensatory justice.

38. Fallacies of Logos • Rest on flaws in the relationship among statements in an argument

39. Hasty Generalization • Making a broad generalization on the basis of too little evidence • Ex: Yesterday I met the most remarkable person. He is kind, considerate, sensitive, and thoughtful.

40. Hasty Generalization • Ex: Jean writes poetry, and she’s very sensitive and frequently depressed. People who write poetry are sensitive and prone to depression.

41. Hasty Generalization

42. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter HocAfter This, Therefore Because of This • Occurs when a sequential relationship is mistaken for a causal relationship • Confusing correlation for cause • Ex: Event A occurred before Event B; therefore, Event A must have caused Event B.

43. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter HocAfter This, Therefore Because of This • Ex: Governor X took office in 2010. In 2011, the state suffered a severe recession. Therefore, Governor X should not be re-elected.

44. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter HocAfter This, Therefore Because of This • Superstition is often based on this fallacy. • Ex: Since I walked under that ladder yesterday, I’ve lost my wallet and received a speeding ticket. • Ex: Everything was going fine until the lunar eclipse last month; that’s why the economy is in trouble.

45. Begging the QuestionCircular Reasoning • Supporting a claim with a reason that simply restates the claim in different words • Ex: Bungee-jumping is dangerous because it’s unsafe. • Ex: Women should not be permitted to join men’s clubs because the clubs are for men only.

46. Begging the QuestionCircular Reasoning • Ex: Abortion is murder because it is the intentional taking of the life of a human being.

47. False Dilemma – Either/Or • Oversimplifying a complex issue so that only two choices appear possible • No alternative, middle-ground, or compromise positions are acknowledged. • Often one of the choices is made to seem unacceptable , so the only remaining option is the other choice. • Ex: It’s my way or the highway.

48. False Dilemma – Either/Or • Ex: Love football or you’re not a man. • Ex: A woman can either be a mother or have a career. • Ex: Either we get tough with drug users, or we legalize all drugs.

49. False Dilemma – Either/Or

50. Slippery Slope • Based on the fear that once we put a foot on a slippery slope heading in the wrong direction, we will have to keep going. • Often functions as a scare tactic