50 likes | 154 Views
2008 Stage 3 centralised review– lead reviewer perspective. Justin Goodwin. LR Perspective. Preparation Work needed in weeks prior to review Communications Questions management The Team Previous experience Language Generalist The Week Well supported by EEA (FTP site etc). The Parties
E N D
2008 Stage 3 centralised review– lead reviewer perspective Justin Goodwin
LR Perspective • Preparation • Work needed in weeks prior to review • Communications • Questions management • The Team • Previous experience • Language • Generalist • The Week • Well supported by EEA (FTP site etc) • The Parties • Responsiveness • The Data • Recalculations Comparisons & IEFs important (Activity Data) • The Foundation • Improved Guidebook will improve ability to recommend • Cross cutting chapters important • Transparency is important • Language issues
Stage 3 Review Process • Organise... • LRs teams and outputs • ERT Sector/Country • Assess... TCCCA • Big sectors (Pollutants, Timeseries) • Recalc., NEs & New? • Follow up previous reviews. • Engage..As early as possible • Questions. identify problem. • Ask more questions • Produce.. • Transcript (Complete Record) • Report: (Priority findings & Recommendations)
Recommendations for Improvement • Data: • Sector specific recalculations • CLRTAP and NECD sector specific differences • All Emissions data & Activity & IEFs • UNFCCC CRF activity data • IIRs: • IIRs should be structured the same • Non English IIRs to have English summaries • Stage 2 support: • Ask parties to review and comment on KCA done by secretariat • Process: • Questions need to be managed better by LRs. • Generalise + LR needed to help this run smoothly... • IT: • Shared Server for working file. • Templates better linked (Transcript and Review Report).
Thank you And... New Review Report New Transcript