700 likes | 719 Views
This week's discussion delves into the fascinating realm of planetary interiors, focusing on how gravity provides crucial insights into a planet's mass, density, and interior structure. By analyzing the shapes and moments of inertia of spinning planets, we can glean valuable information about their internal composition and strength. Learn about how gravity helps unveil lateral variations in subsurface density and how moments of inertia reveal density distribution uniquely. Explore the significance of the geoid, reference ellipsoid, and hydrostatic figures in understanding planetary surfaces. Gain insights into the calculation and importance of moments of inertia, and their relation to gravity and planetary shapes. Discover the concept of true polar wander and its effects on a spinning planet's orientation. Join us in unraveling the mysteries of planetary structures through the lens of gravity, density, and moments of inertia.
E N D
Last Week • Gravity and the potential • Bulk density inferred from gravity
This Week – Shapes and Moments of Inertia • Gravity gives us the mass/density of a planet. How? • Why is this useful? Density provides constraints on interior structure • What is the gross structure of a spinning planet? • We can obtain further constraints on the interior structure from the moment of inertia • How do we obtain it? • What does it tell us? • We can also use gravity to investigate lateral variations in the subsurface density • See Turcotte and Schubert chapter 5
What is the shape of a spinning planet? f = (a-c)/a • Why do we care? • f(internal structure, strength) • Spinning produces large topography relative to Earth’s geologic topography. • As the largest deformation, it’s an important reference point for all gravity and topography measurements. • Example: Satellite motions. • So what is the shape in equilibrium with gravity? Steel vs. water planet? Newton/ Late 1600s.
a Newton’s Method for Shape f = (a-c)/a • The pressure under each water well (or column of mass) at the pole and equator must be equal, if the sphere is in equilibrium. • g varies with distance differently in each well. c a
Spinning Water Balloon Demonstration • Problems with comparing this to planets?
Reference Ellipsoid • A longitude-independent ellipsoid that serves as a reference for the shape of a planet (e.g. WGS 84 for the Earth). • Defined by a = 6,378.137 km at the equator and f = 1/298.257223563.
Back to potentials • Recall: • Gravity potential extends out to infinity. • Obeys Laplace’s equation. • Its negative gradient is gravity. • Equipotential surfaces help define undulations in gravity (drawing of spherical potential with mountain perturbation) • Oceans form an equipotential surface.
The geoid and reference ellipsoid • Geoid: the observed equipotential that coincides with sea level (inferred under continental mass, but equal to the water level occupied by a thin canal connecting the oceans) • Geoid “height”: height of geoid above /below reference ellipsoid. • Gravity is everywhere perpendicular on the geoid.
Disturbances to ocean surfaces/geoid • Hydrostatic figure: the hypothetical equipotential figure that would be assumed if a planet was fluid (assuming you know its density structure and spin rate). E.g. ocean surface E.g. seamount From MIT OCW
Moments of Inertia • Gravity tells you about the density distribution, non-uniquely • Moments of inertia tell you about the radial distribution of density (also non-uniquely).
Moment of Inertia (1) • The moment of inertia (MoI) is a measure of an object’s resistance to being “spun up” or “spun down” • In many ways analogous to mass, but for rotation • MoI must always be measured about a particular axis (the axis of rotation) • The MoI is governed by the distribution of mass about this axis (mass further away = larger MoI) • Often abbreviated as I; also A,B,C for planets • In the absence of external forces (torques), angular momentum (Iw) is conserved (ice-skater example) R w Linear acceleration: F Rotational acceleration: F (T is torque (=2 F R))
Moment of Inertia (2) • MoI is useful because we can measure it remotely, and it tells us about distribution of mass (around an axis) • This gives us more information than density alone Same density Different MoI • Calculating MoI is straightforward (in theory): r dm
R a a Calculating MoI • Some simple examples (before we get to planets) Uniform hoop – by inspection I=MR2 R Uniform disk – requires integration I=0.5 MR2 Uniform sphere – this is one to remember because it is a useful comparison to real planets I=0.4 MR2
Moments of Inertia y • Arbitrary 3D object • Can calculate the moment of inertia about any axis. x z I r dm
Principal moments of inertia y I2 • There are three axes, that diagonalize this tensor and distribute mass evenly along the three axes: • Eigenvectors provide the axis directions. • The eigenvalues are the principal moments of inertia, I1, I2, I3 x I1 z I3
In planetary science: C • Planets are mostly spherical, but have slight deviations. • Principal moments: A < B < C A B
Aside: Relation to gravity spherical harmonics • Principal moments of inertia are related to the 2-degree gravity spherical harmonics coefficients (r radius, M mass):
Tri-axial ellipsoid • An ellipsoid that represents the short, long, and intermediate axes of a body. • Recall WGS 84 represents the present standard ellipsoid c C b B a A Length axes. Which are the moment of inertia axes?
True Polar Wander • Changes in a spinning planet’s moments of inertia produce an orientation change known as “true polar wander.” Spin axis does NOT change
First, add spin y C • Regular motion results when angular momentum vector L and spin vector w align with a principal moment. L ω x A z B
Torque free precession y C • If the angular momentum is not along one of the principal moments, the object precesses • Complex motion • w and C precess around L. • Lstays fixed in place L x ω A z L w C B Thrown plate example
Example 1: Toutatis • Rotation is not along a principal axis, free precession. • Damping to principal axis rotation? Chang’e 2 lunar mission (Dec. 2012):
Precession damping: Reorientation y C • If the body is not rigid, precession will damp • Orientation will change. L x ω A z B
Precession damping: Reorientation y • If the body is not rigid, precession will damp • Orientation will change. • Angular momentum vector stays fixed! C L x ω A z B
Aside: Damping timescale • Time to damp out precession in a non-rigid body • Depends on Q (quality factor) of the whole-body oscillations. • m is bulk rigidity (similar to Young’s modulus) • K3 is ratio of average to maximum strain (~0.01-0.1) See Burns and Safronov 1973
True polar wander (1) New C! C Initially L, w, C aligned. ω L My house (small) Density anomaly forms. A B A = B = C
True polar wander (2) L ω Initially L, w, C aligned. C Density anomaly forms. A w, C precess around L (w, Lbarely change) Eventually, precession damps, the anomaly moves to the equator: True polar wander B A ≠ B ≠ C
True polar wander (3) C Initially L, w, C aligned. ω L Density anomaly forms. w, C precess around L (w, Lbarely change) A Eventually, precession damps, the anomaly moves to the equator: True polar wander B A < B = C Final, equilibrium configuration
Example: Mars Tharsis • Why is this terrain centered at the equator?
Example: Mars Tharsis • Why is this terrain centered at the equator? • Probably formed at a different latitude, driven to the equator by true polar wander.
Other examples • Pluto and the Moon Center of farside Center of long axis of shape ellipsoid See Garrick-Bethell et al. 2014
Other examples • Pluto and the Moon Nimmo et al. 2016
Torque-free precession (summary) L w n • Precession: rotation of the rotation axis, about some other axis. • Rotation about a principal axis of inertia is stable. • Angular velocity vector (w) and angular momentum (L = Iw) vectors will be aligned. • If misaligned: • Torque-free precession. Precession of w (and n in the same plane) about L. Example: thrown plate/spinning disk. • If the body is at least at least semi-fluid, it will slowly rearrange to align the two (principal axis rotation), possibly over millions of years for planetary bodies. • Example: Lunar polar wander. Asteroid Toutatis is in a state of free precession
True polar wander (summary) • Moment of inertia changes happen (geology) misaligns C and L. • C prefers energetically to align with L, and does so over long times if the body is semi-fluid. • Hence, the planet’s orientation changes, while L stays fixed in space. Red blob represents a positive density anomaly that just appeared. It shifts the C moment axis away from the spin axis. Eventually Earth shifts the mass to the equator, realigning C and L.
Moments of inertia + gravity • Planets are flattened (because of rotation - centripetal) • This means that their moments of inertia (A,B,C) are different. By convention C>B>A • C is usually the moment about the axis of rotation A C • Differences in moments of inertia are indications of how much excess mass is concentrated along which axes, example: (C-A) represents how much mass is in the equator. Related to the flattening f = (a-c)/a.
Mass deficit at poles Mass excess at equator Moment of Inertia Difference • Because a moment of inertia difference indicates an excess in mass at the equator, there will also be a corresponding effect on the gravity field • So we can use observations of the gravity field to infer the moment of inertia difference • The effect on the gravity field will be a function of position (+ at equator, - at poles) How do we use the gravity to infer the moment of inertia difference?
P b r a f R Point source: Extra term from bulge: Corresponding increase in C : mR2 increase in A: 0 So now we have a description of the gravity field of a flattened body, and its MoI difference (C-A = mR2) Relating C-A to gravity (1) • Here is a simple example which gives a result comparable to the full solution • See T&S Section 5.2 for the full solution (tedious) We represent the equatorial bulge as two extra blobs of material, each of mass m/2, added to a body of mass M. We can calculate the resulting MoI difference and effect on the gravitational acceleration as a function of latitude f. M m/2
Gravity field of a flattened planet • The full solution is called MacCullagh’s formula: MoI difference Contribution from bulge Point source • Note the similarities to the simplified form derived on the previous page • So we can use a satellite to measure the gravity field as a function of distance r and latitude f, and obtain C-A • We’ll discuss how to get C from C-A in a while • The MoI difference is often described by J2, where J2 is dimensionless, a is the equatorial radius. This is a the second degree spherical harmonic coefficient, with l = 2, m = 0, can be written C2,0
Examples • MESSENGER mission to Mercury: Early flyby produced C-A estimates. • MESSENGER mission goal was to improve these estimates via the second degree spherical harmonics (J2) • C-A estimates can tell us about the strength and internal structure of a body: is the flattening equal to the hydrostatic value (more later)?
Radial component Radial component of acceleration: r cosf Outwards acceleration where w is the angular velocity So the complete formula for acceleration gon a planet surface is: Effect of rotation (on surface) • Final complication – a body on the surface of the planet experiences rotation and thus a centrifugal acceleration • Effect is pretty straightforward: w r f
Recall: Gravitational Potential • Gravitational potential is the work done to bring a unit mass from infinity to the point in question: • For a spherically symmetric body, U=-GM/r • For a rotationally flattened planet, we end up with: • This is useful because a fluid will have the same potential everywhere on its surface – so we can predict the shape of a rotating fluid body
a c a Rotating Fluid Body Shape • For a fluid, the grav. potential is the same everywhere on the surface • Let’s equate the polar and equatorial potentials for our rotating shape, and let us also define the ellipticity (or flattening): • After a bit of algebra, we end up with: Note approximate! Remember that this only works for a fluid body! • Does this make sense? • Why is this expression useful? • Is it reasonable to assume a fluid body?
Pause & Summary • Moment of inertia depends on distribution of mass • For planets, C>A because mass is concentrated at the equator as a result of the rotational bulge • The gravity field is affected by the rotational bulge, and thus depends on C-A (or, equivalently, J2) • So we can measure C-A remotely (e.g. by observing a satellite’s orbit) • If the body has no elastic strength, we can also predict the shape of the body given C-A (or we can infer C-A by measuring the shape)
How do we get C from C-A? • Recall that we can use observations of the gravity field to obtain a body’s MoI difference C-A • But what we would really like to know is the actual moment of inertia, C(why?) • Two possible approaches: • Observations of precession of the body’s axis of rotation • Assume the body is fluid (hydrostatic) and use theory
Torque-induced Precession (1) • Application of a torque (T) to a rotating object causes the rotation axis to move in a circle - precession wp T=mgrsin() wp=mgrsin()/Iw r • The circular motion occurs because the instantaneous torque is perpendicular to the rotation axis • The rate of precession increases with the torque T, and decreases with increasing moment of inertia (I) • An identical situation exists for rotating planets . . .
w Precession (2) North Star planet • So the Earth’s axis of rotation also precesses • The rate of precession depends on torque and MoI (C) • The torque depends on C-A (why?) • So the rate of precession gives us (C-A)/C Sun summer winter
Putting it together • If we can measure the rate of precession of the rotation axis, we get (C-A)/C • For which bodies do we know the precession rate? • Given the planet’s gravitational field, or its flattening, we can deduce J2 (or equivalently C-A) • Given (C-A)/C and (C-A), we can deduce C • Why is this useful? • What do we do if we can’t measure the precession rate?
Cassini (1693) Ecliptic normal 1.5º Spin pole M The lunar spin axis processes around the ecliptic pole with a period of 18.6 years.