1 / 41

Lessons from the LEUTL Zone

Dive into the comprehensive workshop on Injector Commissioning, FEL Experiments, and Undulator Line Diagnostics held at SLAC in 2006, covering in-depth topics on optical intensity gain and statistics, microbunching measurements, and beam property matching for advanced operations.

Download Presentation

Lessons from the LEUTL Zone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lessons from the LEUTL Zone Stephen Milton and John Lewellen (plus a cast of others) Argonne National Laboratory Injector Commissioning Workshop, SLAC 11 October 2006

  2. The APS SASE-FEL

  3. Overall Philosophy • Do FEL Experiment • No New Technology that is not Absolutely Necessary

  4. Undulator Line

  5. Undulator Line Diagnostics

  6. Undulator Line Diagnostics

  7. 7 . 1 10 6 . 1 10 5 . 1 10 4 . 1 10 3 . 1 10 Intensity [arb. units] 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 Distance [m] Optical Intensity Gain 530nm 10 March 01 dataset DS1

  8. 7 . 1 10 6 . 1 10 5 . 1 10 4 . 1 10 3 . 1 10 Optical Intensity Statistics 0.75 Unsaturated Intensity [arb. units] Norm. Std. Dev. Intensity 100 Saturated 10 1 0.1 0.25 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 Distance [m]

  9. Second Harmonic Gain

  10. VLD2 (4.8 m) VLD7 (16.8 m) VLD9 (21.6 m) VLD3 (7.2 m) VLD5 (12 m) Z-Dependent SASE Spectra – 385 nm Simulation Experiment VLD2 (4.8 m) Simulation VLD3 (7.2 m) VLD5 (12 m) VLD7 (16.8 m) VLD9 (21.6 m)

  11. 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 Microbunching Measurement SASE light Intensity [arb. units] CTR light 100 10 1 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 Distance [m]

  12. Simultaneous Spectra: Fundamental and 2nd Harmonic

  13. Optical Pulse Characterization

  14. Wavelength Tunability(Saturation Achieved) 110 nm? 130 nm 220 nm 385 nm 530 nm 540 nm 660 nm Wavelength [nm]

  15. LEUTL Basic Layout

  16. Linac Details Spectrometer L3 Chicane L1 L2 Spectrometer Spectrometer L4 L5 Booster Bypass PAR Bypass Und. 1 Und. N Spectrometer

  17. Photocathode RF GunDrive Laser - Basic Specifications

  18. LEUTL Drive Laser Room

  19. Other Features of Laser • Basics • 6 Hz • No Longitudinal Shaping • Iris used for transverse shaping • Features • Remote control of all significant tuning and steering • Added Locally • Virtual Cathode • Additional Diagnostics • Insertable screens • Energy Meters • One in tunnel did not always work • Every measurement that one can make without changing anything should be available in the control room

  20. Laser Problems • Stability • Mostly Energy • Wandering Arrival Phase • Day-to-day transverse uniformity • Better at lower power • Required for better stability • On all the time • But burnt out flashlamps more often • Replace flashlamps every maintenance period • Pulse Selection from Regen • Double pulses • Basically required • A laser expert • Two-year learning period • Reasonable expectations

  21. Photocathode RF GunCavity - Basic Specifications

  22. PC Gun and First Section

  23. PC Gun Problems • Cathode Quality • QE • Uniformity • Strong impact on emittance • Both changed over time • Basic Cathode Design • Difficult to tune • Difficult to seal • Stability Required • Power on gun 24/7 • Gun beat up after a few years of ops • Probably impact tune of gun • Not enough diagnostics on gun • Zero mode effects • Not careful enough at restoring absolute launch times • Solenoid • Unwanted quadrupole term • Made matching difficult

  24. 31 Oct 01 – before 1st cleaning 5 Nov 2001 - after 1st cleaning 4 Dec 2001 - after 1st cleaning 10 Dec 2001 - after 2nd cleaning Cathode Issues ?

  25. “Normal” Performance

  26. Switching to LEUTL Operations • Shut down rf, modulators ready-to-pulse • Reconfigure rf waveguide switch • Standardize / degauss all linac magnets • Switch linac timing source to 11.9 MHz master clock (for trigger sync.) • Bring rf systems back up • Bring magnets back up

  27. LEUTL Operational Issues • Single shift operation • Required restarting each shift (every 8 or 12 hours) • Impacted everything • Gun • Laser • Bunch compression • Linac Match • Lesson • A machine the works great for 3rd generation operations is no where near good enough for 4th generation ops

  28. Beam Property MeasurementTwiss Parameters and Matching Matching Section 3 YAG screens in free-space drift region APS LINAC Given Obtain Profile measurements Distance between screens Beam parameters a, b, e Beamline geometry Quad settings Settings for “perfect” match into LEUTL line

  29. Twiss Parameters and Matching Beam Property Measurement PAR Bypass 3-screen region 4.8 m 4.8 m

  30. Notes on Matching and Beam Transport • Matching • Two 3-screen Locations • One following the bunch compressor • One following the linac • Algorithm used not especially robust • Two “others” (Quad Scans) • After 1st linac section • Near undulator • Not very effective or used regularly • Should have had another 3 screen system in front of undulator • Matching Difficult at best • Highly dependent on • initial transverse distribution • Charge • Laser pulse length • Steering for wakefields • Not preserved day to day

  31. More Notes on Transport • Wakefields • Near the gun at low energy • Mirror • 1st accelerating structure • Along the length of the undulator • Beam Position Monitors • Bunch Length/pattern Effects • Single bunch vs. bunch trains • Compressed vs. not Compressed

  32. Notes About the Bunch Compressor • Moveable Magnets • Transverse • Longitudinal • Configured for better study of CSR • Diagnostics • Full suite • Except no local bunch length monitor • Bunch length measurement • Linac zero-phasing technique • Simple and Effective (100 fs resolution)

  33. Bunch Compressor

  34. Bunch Compressor

  35. Bunch Length Beam Property Measurement linac section run at zero-crossing 4 - 7 ps

  36. Bunch Compressor Studies

  37. What We Would Do Differently if We Were able to Do it Again • Condition • Given the initial infrastructure we had • Teach scuba instead • Laser • Diode pumped laser • Oblique laser injection • Gets rid of wakes from mirror • Frees up beamline for other diagnostics • Cathode • Metal? • Think about CsTe and removable cartridge (loadlock) • Issues with field • Some other materials

  38. What We Would Do Differently if We Were able to Do it Again • RF Gun • Add more diagnostics • New gun style • New solenoid style • Linac • Add more diagnostics with better resolution • General House keeping • Operations • Remove 7 GeV Beam dump system • Improves availability of linac for FEL work

  39. Acknowledgements and Thanks N.D. Arnold, C. Benson, W. Berg, S.G. Biedron, M. Borland, Y.-C. Chae, R.J. Dejus, P.K. Den Hartog, B. Deriy, M. Erdmann, Y.I. Eidelman, E. Gluskin, M.W. Hahne, Z. Huang, K.-J. Kim, Y. Li, A.H. Lumpkin, O. Makarov, S.V. Milton, E.R. Moog, A. Nassiri, V. Sajaev, R. Soliday, N. Sereno, B.J. Tieman, E.M. Trakhtenberg, G. Travish, I.B. Vasserman, N.A. Vinokurov, G. Wiemerslage, B.X. Yang Friends and Colleagues V. Bharadwaj, D. Dowell, P. Emma, J. Galayda, W. Gei, B. Faatz, W. Fawley, H. Freund, J. Power, X.J. Wang,….

  40. Thank You

More Related