360 likes | 380 Views
This article discusses the history of phosphorus in North Carolina soils, including its initial low levels and subsequent buildup through cultivation. It explores the different forms of phosphorus in soils, the critical levels required for optimal crop yield, and the effect of clay content on phosphorus loss. The article also highlights the use of the Mehlich 3 extractant and the importance of historical research and data in making informed decisions about phosphorus management today.
E N D
SERA 6 Meeting June 20, 2011 History of Phosphorus in North Carolina Dr. Eugene Kamprath Professor Emeritus North Carolina Statue University
Norfolk- Coastal Plain Soil fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudult Cecil / Georgeville- Piedmont Soils fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult
Phosphorus • Soils initially low in P • Cultivated soils – buildup of P • Piedmont soils • High buffer capacity • Coastal plain soils • Low buffer capacity
Yield (%) of Check Plots Compared to Fertilized Plots related to STP
P32 Studies with Corn P rate = 18 lbs / acre banded Nelson et al., 1948
Effect of Anion on P Extraction Seatz, 1949, Ph.D Thesis, NCSU
Mehlich 1 (Double Acid) • 0.05 N HCl + 0.025 N H2SO4 • Addition of SO4 increased extraction of P from Al and FePO4 • (Seatz 1949 Ph.D. thesis- NCSU) • Suitable for soils in the southeastern US • Introduced in 1949
Critical M1P for Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Mountain Soils
Piedmont – P Relationships • Al-P converted to Fe-P, rapid rate first 3 years after application • M1-P highly correlated with Al-P • Rapid decrease in M1-P first 2 years after application, followed by much slower rate of decrease • M1-P critical level for wheat, 8 – 10 ppm Shelton, 1960 Ph.D Thesis, NCSU Shelton & Coleman, 1960
Residual P – Georgeville Soil Kamprath, 1967
P Management on Portsmouth Soil • M1-P critical level for corn / soybean, 22 ppm • Long term study 1955 – 1985 • Annual band application of 16 kg/ ha (equal to P removal in grain) maintained critical level • No yield advantage to keeping soil test above critical level • M1-P of 100 ppm supplies adequate P for 14 – 16 yrs. McCollum, 1991
Change in M1P in 3 Ulitsols14-Year Cropping with 0 P Applied
Mehlich 3 Extractant • NH4F, HOAc, NH4NO3, HNO3, EDTA • pH 2.5 • Introduced in 1981 • Extracts 1.5 – 2 times more P than M1P
Critical Levels Coastal Plain • Greenhouse millet • Norfolk M1P = 31 ppm • Field • Portsmouth corn M1P = 22 ppm • Norfolk corn M1P = 25 ppm M3P = 55 ppm • Portsmouth corn M3P = 43 ppm wheat M3P = 64 ppm soybean M3P = 50 ppm • Goldsboro soybean M3P = 40 ppm
Critical Levels Piedmont • Greenhouse millet • Cecil M1P = 16 ppm • Cecil, Davidson, Georgeville M1P = 12 ppm • Field • Davidson, corn & soybean • M1P = 6 – 8 ppm M3P = 10 – 13 ppm • Georgeville • Corn M1P = 8 ppm • Wheat M1P = 8 ppm
P Management • CP soil with initial M1P of 105 ppm after 14 years cropping had M1P of 60 ppm & M3P of 120 ppm – high soil test P • CP soil with initial M1P of 50 ppm supplied adequate P for 13 years, 17 kg P/ha/yr harvested • Piedmont soil with initial M1P of 10 ppm supplied adequate P for 12 years • Annual P rate of 20 kg P/ha maintains critical level
P Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) • Environmental regulation and P loss today • Mehlich 3 P now used as an input for this • Historical research and data important in making decisions about PLAT and P management today