230 likes | 386 Views
Project Quality Management. Lec#13 Project Quality Processes Ghazala Amin. Quality as an organizational goal. Exceeding customer expectations. Creating Customer Value. Not just doing it well but learning to do it better. Employee Empowerment.
E N D
Project Quality Management Lec#13 Project Quality Processes Ghazala Amin
Quality as an organizational goal Exceeding customer expectations Creating Customer Value Not just doing it well but learning to do it better Employee Empowerment Courtesy: Ali Sajid-Cost of Quality in projects
Leadership • As Joseph M. Juran said in 1945, “It is most important that top management be quality-minded. In the absence of sincere manifestation of interest at the top, little will happen below.” • A large percentage of quality problems are associated with management, not technical issues. *American Society for Quality (ASQ), (www.asqc.org/about/history/juran.html).
What is Cost of Quality? “Quality is measured by the cost of quality which is the expense of non conformance– the cost of doing things wrong.” Courtesy: Ali Sajid-Cost of Quality in projects
The Cost of Quality Costs of poor quality “are huge, but the amounts are not known with precision. In most companies, the accounting system provides only a minority of the information needed to quantify this cost of poor quality Juran on Quality by Design, The Free Press (1992), p. 119
Media Snapshot* • A 2004 study by Nucleus Research Inc. estimates that spam will cost large companies nearly $2,000 per employee in lost productivity in 2004 alone, despite investments in software to block spam. Spam currently accounts for more than 70 percent of total e-mail volume worldwide. • In just one month (August 2003), at least 50 new Internet viruses surfaced, and losses related to computer viruses cost North American companies about $3.5 billion. Businesses have suffered at least $65 billion in lost productivity because of computer viruses since 1997. *McGuire, David, “Report: Spam Costs Are Rising at Work,” Washington Post (June 7, 2004).
Poor Quality Cost • 1964, IBM published its first report - included poor-quality cost for internal component mfg, subassembly, final assembly, final machine test, system test, & first 12 months at customer location for 1620 system. called Q-100 Report During following months, report- expanded to cover many other IBM systems.
“Quality is Free” • For average company, the cost of quality is about 25% of total sales • cost of prevention is a fraction of cost of fixing mistakes after they made
The cost of Quality • Investments in prevention can drastically reduce total cost of quality
Cost of Quality-Wikipedia • In process improvement efforts, quality costs or cost of quality is a means to quantify the total cost of quality-related efforts and deficiencies. • It was first described by Armand V. Feigenbaum in a 1956 Harvard Business Review article. • Prior to its introduction, the general perception was that higher quality requires higher costs, either by buying better materials or machines or by hiring more labor. • Furthermore, while cost accounting had evolved to categorize financial transactions into revenues, expenses, and changes in shareholder equity, it had not attempted to categorize costs relevant to quality, which is especially important given that most people involved in manufacturing never set hands on the product. • By classifying quality-related entries from a company's general ledger, management and quality practitioners can evaluate investments in quality based on cost improvement and profit enhancement.
Feigenbaum’s quality cost areasCost of Conformance- Wikipedia
Feigenbaum’s quality cost areasCost of Non-Conformance-Wikipedia
The Cost of Quality • Cost of quality is the total price of all efforts to achieve product or service quality. • It includes work that conforms to the requirements as well as the work resulting from nonconformance to the requirements. • Quality programs also have costs which includes • Training programs • SPC (Statistical Process Control) Costs • Cost to build it right the first time etc.
The Cost of Quality • Types of Quality Costs: • Internal Failure – cost incurred to correct an identified defect prior to shipment to the customer • External Failure - cost incurred due to errors detected by the customer. • Appraisal - cost incurred to determine the condition of the product • Prevention - costs incurred to reduce failure and appraisal cost • Measurement and Test Equipment – capital cost of equipment used to perform prevention and appraisal activities.
The Cost of Non Quality • Cost of non-quality is estimated to be 12-20% of sales versus the “should cost” of 3-5% of sales for a quality program. • Waste of time and material • Rework of poor quality products and additional material for rework • Delays in schedule • Product and service image • Corporate image
Conformance Vs. Non-Conformance Conformance (Quality) Non-Conformance • Planning • Training and indoctrination • Product Design/Validation • Process Validation • Test and Evaluation • Quality Audits • Maint./Calibration • Field Testing • Scrap • Rework • Material cost (additional) • Warranty repairs • Complaint handling • Liability Judgments • Product recall • Field Service • Expediting
Types of Quality Costs • Cost of Compliance • Preventive costs - prevent product defects • Appraisal costs - monitor & compensate when prevention fails • Cost of Non-compliance • Failure costs • Internal losses - scrap, rework • External losses - warranty work, customer complaint departments, litigation, product recalls
Total Failure Cost • Profit lost by selling units as defects • Rework cost • Cost of processing customer returns • Cost of warranty work • Cost of product recalls • Cost of litigation related to products • Opportunity cost of lost customers
Three Areas to Improve Quality • Quality of design • meet the customer’s needs • design for manufacturability • build quality in • Quality of conformance • minimize and control process variation to satisfy the design specifications every time • Quality of service • The customer must come first