230 likes | 244 Views
Report on 802.15. Authors:. Date: 2016-03-18. Abstract. Report on 802.15 as presented to 802.11. 802.15.3d 100 Gb/s. Approval of Call for Proposal (15-15-0936r4) and Supporting Documents : CMD (15-14-0310r19) TRD (15-14-310r20) ECD (15-15-412r13) Review on Time Planning (15-14-0155r10)
E N D
Report on 802.15 Authors: Date: 2016-03-18 Clint Chaplin, Imagicon
Abstract Report on 802.15 as presented to 802.11
802.15.3d100 Gb/s Approval of Call for Proposal (15-15-0936r4) and Supporting Documents : CMD (15-14-0310r19) TRD (15-14-310r20) ECD (15-15-412r13) Review on Time Planning (15-14-0155r10) Finalisation of Liaison Statement to ETSI ISG mWT (15-15-0722r5 Finalisation of Response to Liaison Statement from ITU-R (15-15-0699r7) Skipping May, presenting proposals in July Slide 3 Slide 3
802.15.3eHigh Rate Close Proximity (HRCP) First Initial WG Ballot on draft 1.0 closed May 6, 2015. Results 65/4/2 94.20% Passed! Resolved 133 out of 140 comments Agreed on BRC and call schedule Slide 4 Slide 4
802.15.3m802.15.3 Revision Draft passed sponsor ballot Recommending to submit to RevCom Slide 5 Slide 5
802.15.4nChinese Medical Band Published Slide 6 Slide 6
802.15.4qUltra Low Power Published Slide 7 Slide 7
802.15.4sSpectrum Resources Usage Heard presentation. Proposal of SRM service primitives for Technical Guidance Document (15-16-128r2) Reviewed and discussed of Technical Guidance Document (15-14-555r13) Reviewed Draft document. TG4s decided start comment collection of the Draft before May meeting Slide 8 Slide 8
802.15.4tHigher Rate Reviewed Scope and Purpose Reviewed TGD Scheduled Hearing of Proposals Heard Proposal Adopted Baseline Proposal Hoping for letter ballot on September 2016 Slide 9 Slide 9
802.15.4uSupport for India Bands Reviewed informal WG Draft review results No comments received, nothing to resolve Initiate WG letter ballot Slide 10 Slide 10
802.15.7r1 Optical Camera Communication Presented responses to call for proposals and continued proposal merger process Proposals from 14 institutions: Intel, pureLiFi, Ozyegin University, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Fraunhofer HHI, SYCA, National Taiwan University, Kookmin University, Panasonic, Fudan University, China Telecom, Istanbul Medipol University, SNUST, Huawei Proposers must submit draft text two weeks before opening of May interim In May, work on draft D0 Slide 11 Slide 11
802.15.8 Peer Aware Communications Compilation and resolution of TBD items Draft Document D0.20 completed Reading Doc. D0.20 Hoping to letter ballot in May 2016 Slide 12 Slide 12
802.15.9 Key Management Protocol Recommended by RevCom for publication Slide 13 Slide 13
802.15.10 Layer 2/Mesh Under Routing (L2R) LB 116 Results Review / Accept Rogue Comments Resolve Comments from LB 116 # LB COMMENTS 146 # TECHNICAL 44 Resolved 40 Work in Progress 4 # EDITORIAL 101 Resolved 6 # ROGUE COMMENTS 86 # TECHNICAL 6 Resolved 5 Work in Progress 1 # EDITORIAL 80 Comment Database - doc. # 15-15-0318-45 Re-Establish TG10 BRC Slide 14 Slide 14
ULI (Upper Layer Interface) SG Worked on PAR and CSD Approved modified PAR and CSD Asking for approval at EC Slide 15 Slide 15
4v (Regional SUB 1GHz Bands) SG Worked on PAR and CSD Approved modified PAR and CSD Asking for approval at EC Slide 16 Slide 16
6TiSCH IG Reviewed new charter of IETF 6tisch Discussed and agreed upon a recommendation for IETF Payload ID IG 6T recommends that the IETF be given a Payload ID upon a proper request from IETF to 802.15 T Kivinen/P Kinney will draft a document providing information as to how the IE is formatted to provide sub types Done: Title=IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for IETF, https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-00.txt Discussed expanding the scope of this IG to include 6lo and core Agreed that expansion of the IG scope was appropriate along with changing the name to identify the expanded scope Chair will reach out to 6lo and core chairs to ask if they wish a liaison with 802.15 Change: 802.15 chair will formally set up an 802.15 liaison to IETF, therefore IG 6T would change to IG IETF Slide 17 Slide 17
Dependable IG Review of Responses to Call for Interest(CFI) Review of Call for Interest(CFI): doc.#15-14-0449-06-0dep Review of Summary of Responses for CFI: doc.#15-15-0217-06-0dep Review of Scope and Focused Applications with Different QoS Levels; doc.#15-16-0111-00-0dep Necessary Process and Possible Timeline to SG and next steps Drafting preliminary PAR doc.#15-16- Discussion on Preparation of preliminary CSD Discussion on timeline for Waikoloa in May and San Diego in July Slide 18 Slide 18
High Rate Rail Communications IG Technical discussion Performance Evaluation of Millimeter-wave-based Communication System in Subway Tunnels (15-16-0185-01-hrrc) Performance evaluation of testbeds of the rail communication system developed by ETRI in Seoul subway tunnel (subway line 8) Coverage test to determine an appropriate RU spacing in the tunnel for demonstration Deployment of the testbed in the Seoul subway line 8 Field trial of the system in moving subway train Demonstration video Discussion on other issues Recent 3GPP’s standardization issues relevant to IG HRRC Updated Call for Interest (CFI) document will be posted before July meeting in San Diego Discussion on the possibility of transition to study group Slide 19 Slide 19
THz IG 1 contribution: B. Peng (TU Braunschweig), “Channel Characteristics Study for Future Indoor Millimeter And Submillimeter Wireless Communications ,” (15-16-0208r00) Achievements Finalisation of Response to Liaison Statement from ITU-R (15-15-0699r7) Discussed the initiation of a Technical Expectations Document Slide 20 Slide 20
WNG SC Presentation: Proposal for an adaptive throughput link budget mode in 802.15.4 (15-16-0238-01) by W Mulder (Dialog Semiconductor) There were no responses from individuals willing to participate in an IG on this concept. No IG was formed Slide 21 Slide 21
Maintenance SC Standards issues: 6 questions from KooroshAkhavan were addressed Question 1: When will the 802.15.4-2015 standard be released? Very soon, perhaps April Question 2: Is the PAN-ID table in 802.15.4e correct? No, refer to 15-15-0911-00 for correct text Question 3: should the FCS be included in the Wake-up frame? Yes, refer to 802.15.4-2015 for correct text Question 4: should the wakeup frame have a 2-octet Frame Control? Yes, refer to 802.15.4-2015 for correct text Question 5: Does the wakeup frame have security? Yes, it can be authenticated Question 6: Should the wakeup frame have a 2-octet Frame Control? Yes, refer to 802.15.4-2015 for correct text Operations Manual Discussed future changes to the ANA section permitting additional behaviors Slide 22 Slide 22
References This document All Documents https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/documents Current draft is in the members-only area http://www.ieee802.org/15 Members_Only_Area 802.11 members log in using 802.11 username and password Slide 23