1 / 9

Can FDI Spur Innovation in Developing Countries?

Can FDI Spur Innovation in Developing Countries?. Nagesh Kumar RIS, New Delhi. Background. Global innovative activity is highly concentrated: top 10 countries account for 84% of R&D expenditure 95% of world patents 91% of technology fees paid

tod
Download Presentation

Can FDI Spur Innovation in Developing Countries?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Can FDI Spur Innovation in Developing Countries? Nagesh Kumar RIS, New Delhi CTDS

  2. Background • Global innovative activity is highly concentrated: top 10 countries account for • 84% of R&D expenditure • 95% of world patents • 91% of technology fees paid • Recent trend of globalization of MNEs’ R&D activity • Potential to contribute to the innovative capability in host countries • Alter the global pattern of technology generation CTDS

  3. Trends and patterns in overseas R&D • Overseas R&D activity is still the least globalized of MNEs’ activities • Largely concentrated in developed countries • 91% of overseas R&D activity of US MNEs is located in other developed countries • The rest is concentrated in a handful of relatively advanced developing countries CTDS

  4. Motivations for internationalization of R&D by MNEs • Adaptations for local markets • To exploit cheaper resources such as manpower • Strategic reasons: to absorb spillovers of knowledge from the national innovation systems in other countries CTDS

  5. Lessons from studies on Determinants of Location of Overseas R&D • Analysis covering R&D investments by the US and Japan in 74 countries, in 7 branches of manufacturing, across 3 points of time suggests following factors as the important attractions: • Availability and cost of R&D manpower in the country • Scale of innovative activity in the country • Technology specialization of the country in the industry of investor • Market size of the country • Implications: • MNEs locate R&D activity in countries that are already technologically advanced • The countries that are poor technologically have very little prospect of attracting MNEs investments in R&D activity • They thus actually perpetuate the global asymmetries CTDS

  6. Gains from R&D Activity of MNEs • Nature of R&D activity of MNEs and local firms different • Indian study covering 4000 enterprises over 10 years • R&D activity of MNE affiliates was motivated to adapt their products to local requirements or doing projects for their parents • R&D activity of domestic enterprises was either motivated to absorb and adapt the licensed technology or towards strengthening their international competitiveness • Implication: gains from R&D activity of MNE affiliates and domestic firms could be very different CTDS

  7. Is there a role for the government policies? • Governments impose various performance requirements on foreign investors, e.g.: • Local content requirements (LCRs) in different forms • Export performance requirements in different forms • Indirect export performance requirements in the form of trade balancing or dividend balancing, or foreign exchange neutrality requirements • Requirement to establish a joint venture with domestic participation or for minimum level of domestic equity participation • Employment performance requirements • Requirement to transfer technology, production processes or other proprietary knowledge • R&D requirements CTDS

  8. Evidence • Domestic equity requirements and Technological Capability and Innovation • Favourable externalities in the form of local learning and absorption of knowledge brought-in: Case studies from Korea (Kim 1997); India (UNCTAD 2003) • Do they affect the content of technology transfer? • Cases to show that key technologies may not be transferred to even 100% subsidiaries • gains of local learning may outweigh the possible costs • Also case studies on favourable impact of PRs e.g. LCRs and EPRs CTDS

  9. Concluding Remarks • Globalization of R&D activity is hardly able to contribute to building of innovative capability in developing countries • Performance requirements can play a useful role in building local technological capability • Developed countries have used them effectively in their process of development • It is now the turn of developing countries to use them • Need to preserve this policy space for development: NO to international rules on investment • Review of TRIMs Agreement to seek flexibilities for developing countries to impose PRs that are phased out CTDS

More Related