1 / 36

Future of social science and libraries

Future of social science and libraries. A presentation to the IFLA Social Science Libraries Pre-Conference August 2008 Laine G.M. Ruus University of Toronto. Data Library Service 2008-08-05. Overview. Why data services began in the social sciences

torie
Download Presentation

Future of social science and libraries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Future ofsocialscience and libraries A presentation to the IFLA Social Science Libraries Pre-Conference August 2008 Laine G.M. Ruus University of Toronto. Data Library Service 2008-08-05

  2. Overview • Why data services began in the social sciences • History of data services from a Canadian perspective • Models of organizing data services • The future – a highly personal perspective

  3. Why data services began in the social sciences • Relative rates of change/periodicity • Geology (,000 or ,000,000s of years) • Social sciences (years, months, weeks significant) • Finance (days) • Environment (hours) • Therefore, need to study/predict change more immediate and visible

  4. Why data services began in the social sciences (cont’d) • Replicability – if you loose it, can you ever get it back? • Access to historical data • Keeping the report is no substitute • Research funding • Well funded sciences collect more data, no need for secondary analysis • Academic stature measured by grants; collecting more data needs a bigger grant • social sciences always poor

  5. Why data services began in the social sciences (cont’d) • Importance of comparative research: time and/or space and/or interdisciplinary • Note: data preservation/service procedures and skill are relatively discipline neutral • Data files in the sciences are a bit bigger, some different software is used, and research questions are different

  6. History of data services from a Canadian perspective • The future begins in the past • Germination of data archives/data services in the 1940s • Growth began in the 1960s, in Europe and the US

  7. The first data archives • 1946 – The Roper Public Opinion Research Center, Williams College • 1950s- Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison • 1960 – Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung, Cologne • 1962 – Inter-University Consortium for Political Research (ICPR) • 1963 – International Data Library and Reference Service, University of California, Berkeley • 1964 – DATUM, Bad Goedesberg • 1964 – Steinmetzarchief, University of Amsterdam • 1965 – Louis Harris Political Data Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill • 1967(?)- Social and Economic Archive Committee, University of Essex

  8. …and the first associations • 1962 - CSSDA (Council of Social Science Data Archives) • 1974 – IASSIST (International Association for Social Science Information Systems and Technology) • 1976 – CESSDA (Council of European Social Science Data Archives) • 1977 – IFDO (International Federation of Data Organizations)

  9. …and in Canada • 1957 - Lucci, Rokkan & Meyerhoff report for Columbia University. School of Library Science • 1965 – York University. Institute for Behavioural Research. Data Archive • 1966 – Carleton University Data Centre (Department. of Sociology) • 1970 – University of British Columbia. Data Library ( Library & Computing Centre) • 1974-1979 – Canadian Consortium for Social Research (CCSR) • 1973-1983 – Public Archives of Canada. Machine-Readable Archives

  10. …and more in Canada • 1981 – 1st SSHRCC policy on data deposit (11 institutions listed) • 1988 – CARL consortium to purchase 1986 census data (25 academic institutions) • 1996 – Data Liberation Initiative (DLI) • Today, DLI has 74 member institutions; ICPSR has about 30 member institutions in Canada; Roper has 4 member institutions in Canada

  11. Two models of organizing data services • Canada & US: local data services in academic institutions • Canada – all but 1 in university libraries • US – ca 42% in university libraries • US also has: 3 large ‘national’ archives + state data centers • Rest of the world: centralized national data archives, usually funded by a social science research council – none in libraries

  12. Centralized data archives • Pros: • More political clout • Better funding • Synergies of large specialized & stable staff in a central place • Cons: • Less flexibility • More accountability to funding bodies • More stable staff, less ability to hire for changing skills/needs • Distance from the users • Tend to focus more on preservation

  13. Local data services • Pros: • Close to the users • More flexible, sensitive to changing user/institutional needs • Cons: • Lack of resources • Lack of political clout • Staff training and continuing education need to be dealt with differently • Each instance duplicates resources of the others • Higher staff turnover – dead end/partial jobs • High & steep learning curve

  14. The future – a highly personal perspective • New frontiers, not just new tools for old frontiers: numeracy and GIS • Multi/interdisciplinarity provides the ability to apply new independent variables to old dependent variables, and vice versa

  15. Satellite imagery… & gynecology?

  16. MARC records in the economists toolbox…. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  17. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  18. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  19. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  20. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  21. Source: Alexopoulos, M. presentation to University of Toronto conference. 2008

  22. A model of information Wisdom Knowledge Information Data

  23. One new frontier: numeracy/statistical literacy • John Allen Paulos/Innumeracy & Darrell Huff/How to lie with statistics (1954) were not the first, but did much to popularize the problem of innumeracy • Articulation has not made the problem go away • Librarians involved in ‘traditional’ and ‘information’ literacy, also need to be numerically literate • Simplest: reading tables such as …

  24. A question requiring a more sophisticated response: I need expenditures on eye care by age, for as many years as possible. • Requires: • Locating right data source • Having managed the data set in a collection, and providing access to it • Identifying the appropriate technique for generating the required descriptive statistics

  25. These are the ‘published’ statistics. But the student wants expenditure on eye-care by age of household head…solution go to the original source: Survey of household spending

  26. …to generate a table with the required statistics from an original data source.

  27. Skills needed… • Understanding where statistics come from, ie how are they collected • Interpreting statistics • Critical understanding of statistics • Understanding how statistics (especially descriptive statistics) are created • And not being seduced by …

  28. Another new frontier: spatial literacy • Monmonier, Mark & H.J. de Blii/ How to lie with maps • At its simplest, GIS software provides a way to display aggregate statistics, with a geographic/spatial attribute, in a graphic way • Has made aggregate statistics much more comprehensible than published tables in books (whether print or pdf, or Excel)

  29. GIS (Geographic information systems) (cont’d) • At a more sophisticated level, the ability to use spatial relationships as eg an independent variable in models • a simple example, distance to an emergency ward as an explanatory variable for stroke survival rates

  30. Supporting statistics/data and GIS resources as a component of research: • Requires skilled staff • All the usual resources • All the usual library functions (acquisition, technical services, user services, planning), just done a bit differently. • The skills are discipline-neutral: descriptive statistics in environment are created just like those in sociology

  31. Is it worth it? • Data & GIS services reach a wide variety of users, from the President’s office, to undergraduates in Religious Studies • In 2006, 50% of the reference statistics in the combined Government Documents, Data and GIS department, came from Data and GIS. • Government Documents reference statistics are declining; those for Data & GIS continue to rise

  32. In conclusion: • I reissue the challenge that Lucci, Rokkan and Meyerhoff issued in 1957: • Dare to deal not just with information, but a step earlier in the process, with data • Incorporate data services as part of library services • Preservation/archiving may benefit from other institutional models • National data archives and local user services should be complementary – take the folks from your national data archive to lunch!

More Related