70 likes | 192 Views
Preliminary simulation results on differentiated QCN. Marina Lipshteyn. The scenario . 4 Reaction points which transmitted constantly 3.8Gbs to 1 congestion point with pkts size - 0.5KB. Among them, one “victim” TCP session. . Victim flow – TX 3.8Gbs. CP. 3.8Gbs. 3.8Gbs. 3.8Gbs.
E N D
Preliminary simulation results on differentiated QCN Marina Lipshteyn
The scenario 4 Reaction points which transmitted constantly 3.8Gbs to 1 congestion point with pkts size - 0.5KB. Among them, one “victim” TCP session. Victim flow – TX 3.8Gbs CP 3.8Gbs 3.8Gbs 3.8Gbs
With PFC, without QCN The incoming traffic is reduced to: 2.3Gbs 2.3Gbs 2.3Gbs 2.7Gbs
With PFC and QCN The incoming traffic is reduced to: 3.8Gbs 1.6Gbs 2.3-1.8Gbs 2.3-1.8Gbs
Using different types of traffic Only one of the Reaction Points is injecting traffic above commited rate. In my opinion, it is more correct to pause that Reaction Point only. policer Victim flow – TX 3.8Gbs policer policer policer Overcommited traffic CP 3.8Gbs 3.8Gbs 3.8Gbs
Differentiated QCN at the Congestion Point At the Congestion Point define two thresholds for the queue: • The first threshold: When number of bytes in the queue exceeds it, send CNM ONLY IF the probed packet is YELLOW. • The second threshold: When number of bytes in the queue exceeds it, send CNM for any probed probed packet
With PFC and differentiated QCN The incoming traffic is reduced to: 3.8Gbs 2.3Gbs 1.6Gbs Overcommited traffic 3.8Gbs