1 / 15

How the Flemish Inspectorate stimulates innovative schools

How the Flemish Inspectorate stimulates innovative schools. Flemish Inspectorate of Education Ingrid Ocket & Frans De Bie, inspectors. Quality assurance in Flemish education. 3 key words 1. autonomy 2. support 3. accountability. Quality of Education = responsibility of schools.

trapper
Download Presentation

How the Flemish Inspectorate stimulates innovative schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How the Flemish Inspectorate stimulates innovative schools Flemish Inspectorate of Education Ingrid Ocket & Frans De Bie, inspectors

  2. Quality assurancein Flemish education 3 key words 1.autonomy 2. support 3. accountability

  3. Quality of Education = responsibility of schools

  4. Role of the inspectorate  check the 3 quality conditions • does the school respect the rules and regulations and deliver quality education and good quality outcomes? • does the school provide quality monitoring, assuring the quality of the educational processes? • does the school have capacity to establish good policy?  write school reports  advise further recognition

  5. CIPO

  6. Quality examination Preliminary enquiry Audit Inspection report Data analysis Data analysis Results of data analysis Examination:interviews observations Examination:interviews observations Results of examination:interviews observations Interpretation Interpretation Results of interpretation Results of deliberation: strenghts and weaknesses advice Deliberation: focus for the audit Deliberation: advice

  7. Preliminary enquiry  integral enquiry to assess the local situation: Interpretation Integral image of estimated strenghts and weaknesses Deliberation Representative selection of estimated strenghts/weaknesses Audit focus Selection of audit items

  8. Audit •  profound and differentiated case-studies •  technique of triangulation • conversations • observations • document analysis

  9. Audit  with the following basic questions as a guideline: • which initiatives and innovations are being developed? • how the team has chosen the initiatives and innovations • which effects does the team want to achieve by these? • what are the current effects? • how do the team members themselves evaluate the obtained learning effects, results?

  10. Additional enquiries Language policy Science Techniques Engineering Mathematics (STEM) Social Economical Status (SES) Wellbeing

  11. Inspection report •  report about the 3 quality conditions • respecting the rules and regulations • quality monitoring, assuring the quality of the educational processes • capacity to establish good policy  the results of our enquiries with special attention for • our confidence in the institution’s autonomy • deliberation, weighing « strengths » and « weaknesses » • stimulation • signalisation in case of serious structural weaknesses -

  12. Inspection report  chapter with strenghts and weaknesses • relevant aspects which are good, examples of good practice • relevant aspects which can be improved, levers for improvement • relevant aspects which have to be improved, the subject(s) of further control

  13. Final touch concluding conversation about the report  publication on a public website  no ‘ranking’

  14. Study PhD Ilse De Volder

  15. Questions? Final thoughts?

More Related