1 / 11

Emotional Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies

Emotional Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies. Kaylene Ascough University of Queensland Princess Alexandra Hospital. Overview. The EI explosion – some history. Variations of EI – the 2 approaches to EI research The critics Applying EI to the work place EI training programs. Some History.

travis
Download Presentation

Emotional Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotional Intelligence:Facts and Fallacies Kaylene Ascough University of Queensland Princess Alexandra Hospital

  2. Overview • The EI explosion – some history. • Variations of EI – the 2 approaches to EI research • The critics • Applying EI to the work place • EI training programs

  3. Some History • Peter Salovey and Jack Mayer (1990) • “Emotional Intelligence”, in Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. • The ability to perceive emotion in self and others, to understand emotion, and then to manage emotion in self and others. • Daniel Goleman (1995) • “Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ.” • Mayer and Salovey’s MEIS (1997) • Reuven Bar-On (1997) developed the EQ-i, • Goleman (2002) – the Emotional Competency Index. • Other developments by Jordan, Ashkanasy, Härtel, and Hooper (2002); Schutte et al. (1998); and Wong and Law (2002).

  4. Two approaches to EI • Ability model vs personality/mixed model • Ability model: • Based on Mayer and Salovey’s (1997) four-branch abilities model. • Perception of emotion (in self and others); • Assimilation of emotion to facilitate thought; • Understanding of emotion; • Managing and regulating emotion in self and others. • Becoming the more accepted model of EI. • Like IQ, it is the capacity to which an individual can develop.

  5. Two approaches to EI (contd.) • Mixed/Personality Models: • Argued as not representative of EI (Ashkanasy & Daus, 2005). • Some common ground with Mayer and Salovey model. • Overlap with traditional measures of personality. • Examples include Bar-on’s (1997) EQ-i, Goleman, et al’s (2002) ECI. • Maybe useful to the organisation, however, they are too broad in scope and do not differ markedly from personality models. • Goleman – ‘Emotional competency’ • Bar-on – ‘Emotional-Social Intelligence’

  6. The critics • Daus and Ashkansy (2005) address 3 main points of criticism. • Emotional intelligence is dominated by opportunistic ‘academics-turned-consultants’ who have amassed much fame and fortune based on a concept that is shabby science at best. • The measurement of emotional intelligence is grounded in unstable (they change all the time), psychometrically flawed instruments, which have not demonstrated appropriate validity to warrant their use; and • There is no (or weak) empirical evidence that emotional intelligence is related to anything of importance in organisations.

  7. Application of EI • Leadership • EI predicts leader emergence and is related to transformational leadership. • Job performance/Emotional labour • ‘Emotional Labour’ - Defined as ‘managing emotion for remuneration’. • In jobs requiring high emotional labour, an individual’s EI predicted better performance.

  8. Application of EI (Contd.) • Positive organisational behaviour • Those actions in the workplace that benefit working relationships and contribute to a positive working climate. • High EI indicates increased commitment, organisational citizenship and improved morale. • Working with others • Better relationships in the workplace: interpersonal sensitivity and prosocial tendencies. • Indicates better team performance. • Conflict resolution • Individuals with higher levels of EI are more able to engage in collaborative conflict resolution.

  9. EI Training Programs • Is there value in training? • What to look for in EI training programs. • What are you seeking to achieve? • Individual performance • Team performance • Enhancing leadership skills • Enhancing Interpersonal skills • Managing conflict

  10. Conclusion • What does EI mean to an organisation? • Know the pitfalls of EI claims. • Look for abilities based EI models. • Seek training and development programs that show an understanding of all aspects of emotional intelligence and the role of emotions in the work place in general.

  11. Questions? • References Ashkanasy, N. M., Dasborough, M. & Ascough, K. W. (in press). Addressing the emotional dimensions of leadership: Teaching leadership with heart. In S. J. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds).The Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development , Sage. Ashkanasy, N. M. & Daus, C. S. 2002. Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1): 76. Ashkanasy, N. M. & Daus, C. S. 2005. Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4): 441. Bar-On, R. 1997. Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: A measure of emotional intelligence. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems. Bar-On, R.; The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI); http://www.eiconsortium.org/index.html; 23 June 2005, 2005. Daus, C. S. & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2005. The case for the ability-based model of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4): 453. Druskat, V.U., Sala, F., & Mount, G. (Eds) 2006. Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with individuals and groups. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Emmerling, R. J. & Goleman, D.; Emotional Intelligence: Issues and common misunderstandings; http://www.eiconsortium.org/index.html; 23 June 2005, 2005. Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books. Jordan, P. J., Ashton-James, C. E., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2006. Evaluating the claims: Emotional intelligence in the workplace. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), A critique of emotional intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed? Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum. Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ascough, K. W. In press. Emotional intelligence in organizational behavior and industrial-organizational psychology. In G. Matthews & M. Zeidner & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Science of emotional intelligence: knowns and unknowns: Oxford University Press. Lopes, P. N., Côté, S., & Salovey, P. 2006. An ability model of emotional intelligence: Implications for assessment and training. In F. Sala & V. U. Druskat & G. Mount (Eds.), Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work : current research evidence with individuals and groups: xlvii, 292 p. :. Mahwah, N.J. :: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,. Mayer, J. D. & Salovey, P. 1997. What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications: 3-31. New York: Basic Books. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. 2003. Measuring Emotional Intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3(1): 97-105. Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. 2004. Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: A Critical Review. Applied Psychology, 53(3): 371

More Related