1 / 30

Low-thrust trajectory design

Low-thrust trajectory design. ASEN5050 Astrodynamics Jon Herman. Overview. Low-thrust basics Trajectory design tools Real world examples Outlook. Low-thrust. Electric propulsion Solar electric propulsion (SEP) Nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) SEP is mature technology, NEP not exactly

travis
Download Presentation

Low-thrust trajectory design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low-thrust trajectory design ASEN5050 Astrodynamics Jon Herman

  2. Overview • Low-thrust basics • Trajectory design tools • Real world examples • Outlook

  3. Low-thrust • Electric propulsion • Solar electric propulsion (SEP) • Nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) • SEP is mature technology, NEP not exactly • Solar sails • Comparatively immature technology • Performance currently low • All very similar from trajectory design stand point

  4. Electric Propulsion • Chemical propulsion • Up to ~17 000 000 N • About 4 000 000 000 sheets of paper • Engine runs for minutes • Electric Propulsion • About 0.2 Newton • About 4 sheets of paper • Engine runs for months-years • 10 times as efficient

  5. Hall thrusters Exhaust velocity: 10 – 80 km/s Conservation of momentum (University of Tokyo, 2007)

  6. Specific impulse Specific impulse: Rocket equation:

  7. Rocket equation Dawn SMART-1 LEO/GTO to GEO

  8. Why is a higher ISP not always better? (Elvik, 2004)

  9. Implications for optimal trajectories • The optimal transfer properly balances • Specific impulse • Spacecraft power • Mission ΔV • Unique optimum for every mission • ΔV no longer a defining parameter!(arguably: ΔV no longer a limiting parameter)

  10. Trajectory design

  11. Trajectory example • What is difficult about low-thrust? • Trajectory is “continuously” changing • No analytical solutions • Optimal thrust solution only partially intuitive • Specialized, computationally intensive tools required!

  12. Example Method Fly by, probe release, etc...(discontinuous state) Backward integration • JPL’s MALTO • Mission Analysis Low Thrust Optimization • Originally: CL-SEP (CATO-Like Solar Electric Propulsion) Match Points Forward integration Small impulsive burns Source: Sims et al., 2006

  13. MALTO-type tools • Optimize... • Trajectory • Subject to whatever desired trajectory contraints • Specific impulse (Isp) • Spacecraft power supply • Using solar power • Using constant power (nuclear) • Possible: solar sail size, etc.

  14. Strengths • Fast • Robust • Flexible • Optimizes trajectory & spacecraft!

  15. Weaknesses • Ideal for simple (two-body) dynamics • Limited to low revolutions (~8 revs) • No problem for interplanetary trajectories • ~Worthless for Earth departures/planetary arrivals

  16. Real world applications

  17. Dawn (NASA) • Dawn ( 2007 – Present day) • Most powerful Electric Propulsion mission to date • Visiting the giant asteroids Vesta and Ceres

  18. Dawn

  19. SMART-1 (ESA) • Launched in 2003 to GTO • Transfer to polar lunar orbit • Only Earth ‘escape’ with low-thrust • Propellant Mass / Initial Mass: 23% (18% demonstrated later)

  20. SMART-1 (ESA, 1999)

  21. Hayabusa (JAXA) • First asteroid sample return (launched 2003) • 4 Ion engines at launch • 1 & two half ion engines upon return

  22. Hayabusa end-of-life operation Engine 1 Engine 2 (University of Tokyo, 2007)

  23. AEHF-1 (USAF) • GEO communications satellite, launched 2010 • Stuck in transfer orbit (due to propellant line clog) • Mission saved by on-board Hall thrusters (Garza, 2013)

  24. Commercial GEO satellites (Bostian et al., 2000)

  25. Commercial GEO satellites

  26. Commercial GEO satellites (Byers&Dankanich, 2008)

  27. Outlook

  28. Electric propulsion developments • Boeing • Four GEO satellites, 2 tons each • Capable of launching two-at-a-time on vehicles as small as Falcon9 • Private endeavor • ESA/SES/OHB • Public-Private partnership • One “small-to-medium” GEO satellite • Possibly the second generation spacecraft of the Galileo constellation • NASA • 30kW SEP stage demonstrator (asteroid retrieval?)

  29. Conclusion • Electric propulsion rapidly maturing into a common primary propulsion system • This enables entirely new missions concepts, as well as reducing cost of more typical missions • Very capable trajectory design tools exist, but not all desired capability is available or widespread

  30. Questions?

More Related