1 / 31

Utilization of Rehab Services to Decompress Referrals to Specialization Clinics.

Utilization of Rehab Services to Decompress Referrals to Specialization Clinics. Learning Objectives:. To be able to articulate and refer to the appropriate Rehab clinic based on diagnosis.

trinh
Download Presentation

Utilization of Rehab Services to Decompress Referrals to Specialization Clinics.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Utilization of Rehab Services to Decompress Referrals to Specialization Clinics.

  2. Learning Objectives: • To be able to articulate and refer to the appropriate Rehab clinic based on diagnosis. • To understand the scope of Rehab Services to enable primary providers to appropriately utilize Rehab as an option to bridge the gap or eliminate un-needed consults between primary care and specialization/surgical consults resulting in more timely access for patient care. • Review of a journal article of the benefits of early access to physical therapy • Review of clinical examples

  3. Middleton Location • Middleton Rehab • 6630 University Ave • Phone 263-8412 • Fax 263-5011 • Populations Served by PT and OT: • General orthopedic – spine and extremity Dx's • Neurorehab – spinal or brain injuries; chronic developmental impairments – CP, spina bifida; long term illnesses – MS, diabetes, ALS; Geriatrics having difficulties with the aging process; dizziness and balance issues • OP Pediatrics • Orthotics • Lymphedema

  4. Research Park Clinics • Research Park Rehab Clinics – Spine PT/Occupational Health/Pelvic Floor PT/Orthotics/Facial Re-training • 621 Science Drive • Phone 265-3341 • Fax 263-6574 • Populations served by PT, OT and Orthotic technicians: • Spine diagnoses – Lumbar, thoracic, cervical • Functional Capacity Evaluations – Matheson protocol • Pelvic Floor Dx's: Pelvic pain/incontinence/constipation • Aquatic Therapy – spine Dx's primarily • Orthotics – primarily off the shelf products – foot orthotics, knee braces, back supports… • Facial Re-training – Bell’s Palsy; acoustic neuroma

  5. Research Park Clinics • Research Park Rehab Clinics – Sports Rehab • 621 Science Drive • Phone 263-4765 • Fax 263-2215 • Populations served by PT and Athletic Training: • Athletes of all ages and abilities • Extremity Diagnoses • Aquatic therapy – primarily extremity or sports diagnoses

  6. Princeton Club West Location • Princeton Club West • 8042 Watts Rd • Phone 265-7500 • Fax 261-1760 • Populations served by PT and Athletic Training: • Athletes of all ages and abilities • Extremity Diagnoses • Sports performance – functional conditioning and sport specific drills in preparation to return to sport

  7. Princeton Club East Location • Princeton Club East Rehab • 1726 Eagan Road • Phone 265-1221 • Fax 263-2666 • Populations served by PT, OT, Athletic Training: • General orthopedic Dx's – spine and extremity • Pain diagnoses • Lymphedema/hand therapy • Pelvic Floor Dx's: Pelvic pain/incontinence/constipation • Sports Rehab • Bariatric Rehab

  8. UW Hospital Location • UW Hospital Location • 600 Highland Ave, E3/2 • Phone 263-8060 • Fax 262-7679 • Populations served by PT, OT • Upper extremity/hand Dx's • Lymphedema • TMJ • General Orthopedics • Orthotics

  9. Lumbar Spine Differential Dx • Pt. presents with LBP – chronic or acute onset; radicular symptoms or none; traumatic or slow onset • All appropriate for referral to PT – if traumatic onset of LBP, clearance of trauma with x-rays would be ideal

  10. Lumbar Spine Differential Dx • PT Musculoskeletal evaluation • Subjective history – identify red flags and return to MD if appropriate • Posture/alignment – SI, lumbar segmental rotations • Palpation • Response to Traction • ROM • Strength • Repeated movements/flexion vs. ext. bias • Flexibility/Neurological tension • Neurological testing of myotomes and dermatomes • Accessory joint testing • Clear LE

  11. Cervical Spine Differential Dx • Pt. presents with Cervical pain – chronic or acute onset; radicular symptoms or none; traumatic or slow onset • All appropriate for referral to PT – if traumatic onset of cervical pain, clearance of cervical instability with x-rays would be most appropriate • PT Musculoskeletal evaluation – similar to lumbar • Posture/alignment – Cervical/thoracic rotations • Repeated movements/protraction vs. retraction/ext. bias • Clear vertebral artery • Clear UE

  12. Lumbar/Cervical Spine Differential Dx • Treatment categories usually fall into one or more of the following directions: • Directional bias extension (disc derangement) – PT program focuses on centralization of the disc and referred symptoms. • Directional bias flexion (stenosis or less common disc derangements) – PT program focuses on opening up the spinal canal and facet joints. • Neutral spine bias (DDD; postural dysfunction) – PT program focuses on deep abdominal or cervical flexor strengthening

  13. Lumbar/Cervical Spine Differential Dx – treatment categories • Individual or group LS or CS/TS rotation or asymmetry in the pelvis – PT focus on correction of the asymmetry with MET, mobilization and/or manipulation • Muscular imbalance – focus on strength, flexibility and stabilization • Education – biomechanics with ADLs, lifting, ergonomics, work station set-up

  14. Lumbar/Cervical Spine Differential Dx • Clinical pathways expect to see positive change in symptoms and function within 6-10 visits, 2 – 3 months • If no change or minimal improvement, our course of action would be to recommend a referral to a specialist/MRI via the primary care provider. • CareConnections Lumbar Outcome Data 2005 (n = 143): % Decrease in Pain – 69.02% % Increase in Function – 56.67% % Perceived improvement – 79.69% Average number of visits = 6.34

  15. Lumbar/Cervical Spine Differential Dx • CareConnections Cervical Outcome Data 2005 (n = 88): % Decrease in Pain – 63.92% % Increase in Function – 58.57% % Perceived improvement – 81.93% Average number of visits = 6.65 All the above CareConnection data for UWHC Rehab services is better than other like facilities in all categories except equal to results of other like facilities in cervical % decrease in pain.

  16. Lumbar Clinical Example • 50 yo female; Occupation RN • Dx: LBP with pain referral to knee following transfer of a patient • PT evaluation findings: • R sided LBP with referral of pain down lateral R LE to knee • Tingling R ankle and foot • Spasms right anterior Tib. • L Lateral shift • Peripheralization of symptoms with flexion • Centralization of symptoms with R side glide and extension • + SLR R LE • Weak abdominal strength • Tenderness R piriformis and bilateral Psoas

  17. Lumbar Clinical Example Treatment: • Correction of lateral shift and home ex. for maintaining correction • Education on avoidance of bending/slumping; utilization of a lumbar roll; education on correct body mechanics/lifts/ADLs/sitting posture • Extension ex. protocol • Neural gliding exercises to reduce neural tension • Trunk stabilization ex. program • Modalities and manual therapy to Psoas/piriformis if needed.

  18. Cervical Clinical Example • 32 yo male; Occupation: Computer Technician • Dx: Neck pain and HA after a MVA - rear-ended • PT Evaluation Findings: • R neck pain and HAs • Pt. saw collision coming and was looking in the rear view mirror • Tenderness to palpation of the suboccipital muscles and R CS paraspinal musculature • Decreased A/PROM to rotate or side bend neck to the Left with pain on the right • Better with cervical distraction • Poor posture – forward head, protracted shoulders, thoracic kyphosis

  19. Cervical Clinical Example Treatment: • Manual therapy to include suboccipital release and STM/release to CS musculature; CS manual traction • Mobilization and muscle energy techniques (MET) to correct facet dysfunction of limiting opening of R CS facet joint(s) • Ex. program to facilitate L rotation and L SB; stretching of the suboccipital muscles; strengthening of the deep cervical stabilization muscles for posture and cervical stability; postural exercises for scapular retraction and thoracic extension

  20. Pelvic Floor Differential Dx • Typical patient presentation to MD of reports of urinary or bowel urgency and/or urge incontinence; stress incontinence; pelvic pain; difficulties after labor and delivery and feelings or symptoms of prolapse. • All appropriate for referral to PT

  21. Pelvic Floor Differential Dx • Musculoskeletal evaluation similar to Lumbar and with clearance of lumbar spine with added focus on: • Subjective history of voiding behavior and labor and delivery history. Objective additional focus on Psoas, adductors; obturatus internus and pelvic floor musculature. • Internal digital vaginal or rectal assessment of tenderness, tone, strength. • Biofeedback assessment – vaginally or rectally – of tone, strength, relationship between the pelvic floor and abdominal musculature and pelvic floor activity during prescribed exercise program.

  22. Pelvic Floor Differential Dx • Pelvic Floor treatment categories: • Pelvic floor weakness – strengthening exercises with focus on the pelvic floor, adductors, and obturator internus • Increased Pelvic floor tone with weakness – Exercises to decrease tone and calm sympathetic nervous system input and later progression to strengthening; significant pain/tone issues may require internal STM/release manual therapy • Paradoxical relaxation – exercises and often use of a home EMG unit to help patients learn to contract the pelvic floor and keep the abdominals relaxed or vise versa • Educational training in voiding patterns, diet, controlling urge….

  23. Pelvic Floor Differential Dx • Clinical pathways expect to see positive change in symptoms and function within 6-10 visits, 2 – 3 months • If no change or minimal improvement, our course of action would be to recommend a referral to a specialist/MRI…

  24. Pelvic Floor Clinical Example • 50 yo female, occupation teacher • Dx: Urinary frequency; Urge incontinence and deep pelvic pain • PT Evaluation Findings: • Urinary frequency 15-16 x day • Nocturia x 2-3 • Urinary triggers of key in door and running water • Urinary incontinence 5-6x day associated with urge • Feelings on not completely emptying the bladder

  25. Pelvic Floor Clinical Example • Small urinary output at each urination • Constant pelvic pain 5/10; worse with urge and stress • Trigger points in pelvic floor, adductor origin, obturator internus • High pelvic floor tone via EMG assessment – 10 mV at rest • Weak pelvic floor contraction strength via EMG – Average 18 mV • Further increase in pelvic floor tone with pelvic floor contractions to 14 mV • Further elevation of pelvic floor activity/tone with abdominal contraction

  26. Pelvic Floor Clinical Example Treatment: • Education on voiding interval extension via relaxation techniques • Training in diaphragmatic breathing exercises and physiological quieting to facilitate decreasing pelvic floor tone and quieting the sympathetic NS drive • Manual therapy to include STM/release/stroking to pelvic floor, obturator internus, adductors and Psoas musculature • Ex. program of strengthening exercises for the obturatus internus and adductor musculature to facilitate pelvic floor contractions indirectly to avoid elevating pelvic floor tone • As tone normalizes: progress to direct pelvic floor strengthening and use of home EMG to facilitate the ability to contract the pelvic floor without abdominal substitution and vise versa

  27. Care Connections Outcomes 2005 Lower Extremity (n = 86) • 70.68% decrease in pain • 67.75% increase in function • 82.12% perceived improvement • Average 5.90 visits Upper Extremity (n = 87) • 75.18% decrease in pain • 71.82% increase in function • 82.95% perceived improvement • Average 8.37 visits All the above CareConnection data for UWHC Rehab services is better than other like facilities in all categories

  28. “Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute LBP Musculoskeletal Disorders” • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2000;42:35-40. • Authors: Zigenfus GC; Yin J; Giang G; Fogarty WT • Purpose of this study was to evaluate how early therapy might effect treatment outcomes of workers with acute low back injuries at the primary care level. Treatment intensity (total number of MD visits); case duration (days b/t initial visit and release from care); duration of restricted work; and days away from work were examined. • Hypothesis: Early therapy intervention would result in fewer medical treatments, earlier release from care; shortened duration of restricted work activities; and fewer days away from work. • 3867 patients from a retrospective sample taken between July 1997 and June 1998.

  29. “Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute LBP Musculoskeletal Disorders” • Pts divided into 3 groups based on delay in obtaining therapy. • Group 1: 1370 patients received PT the same day or day after their injury Group 2: 2005 patients received PT 2-7 days after the injury • Group 3: 483 patients received PT 8-197 days after injury • PT intensity (number of therapy sessions) showed no significant differences between the groups. It was concluded that the severity level of the 3 groups was the same. • All received therapy at the same clinic and therapy included options from the following list based on individual patient need: therapeutic exercise, Pt. education, manual therapy, electrotherapy, mechanical modalities and physical agents.

  30. “Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute LBP Musculoskeletal Disorders” • Results: • Group 1 had significantly fewer visits to the MD compared to Group 2 which had fewer than group 3. • Group 1 had the shortest case duration, release from care within an average of 9.8 days • Group 2 averaged case duration of 12.3 days • Group 3 averaged case duration of 16.5 days; all durations statistically significant • Statistically significant restricted work duration: • Group 1, 8.1 days • group 2, 9.9 days • group 3, 13.4 days

  31. Questions??? Thanks for all your referrals!!

More Related