1 / 25

Università degli Studi di Pavia

Università degli Studi di Pavia. Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Scienze Politiche, Giurisprudenza, Ingegneria, Economia. Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Editoria e Comunicazione Multimediale. Self-Regulation of the Internet Service Providers. Relatore: chiar.mo Prof. Stefano Colloca.

trish
Download Presentation

Università degli Studi di Pavia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Università degli Studi di Pavia Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Scienze Politiche, Giurisprudenza, Ingegneria, Economia Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Editoria e Comunicazione Multimediale Self-Regulationof the Internet Service Providers Relatore: chiar.mo Prof. Stefano Colloca Correlatore: chiar.mo Prof. Edoardo Fittipaldi Agata Fiordaliso Francesca Cerra

  2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  3. 1. The Web 2.0.. Whatischanged. 1. The Web 2.0. What is changed 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities “Web 2.0 is a set of economic, social, and technology trends that collectively form the basis for the next generation of the Internet—a more mature, distinctive medium characterized by user participation, openness, and network effects.”, John Musser, 2006 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  4. 1. The Web 2.0.. What is changed. 1. The Web 2.0. What is changed 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities MAIN ASPECTS: 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers Social networkingand contentsharing Usercreatedcontent 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown Tagging and social bookmarking 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct Dynamic and interactive Internet applications 6. Conclusions New advertising methods Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  5. 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers An Internet Service Provider (ISP)is a company thatprovides a telecommunication connection to the Internet thatallows a userto "be online". 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  6. 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers Butalso… 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  7. 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers It creates information, educational or entertainment content for the Internet 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  8. 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities REGULATION OF THE CYBERSPACE 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers Laws 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown CodesofConduct Market 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct Social norms and values 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  9. 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities State laws 3. The self-regulationof the Internet Service Providers CO-REGULATION 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct Self-regulationforms 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  10. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities This case isabout: 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers A boy with the Down syndromerecordedbyminors 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  11. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities This case is about: 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers Video uploadedto Google Video 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  12. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities This case is about: 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers Vividownpressedchargesagainst Google 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  13. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct Google hasbeencondemnedfor the infringmentof the Italianlawsabout privacy 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  14. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities Google-Vividownprotocol: trustedusers 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  15. 4. An emblematic case: Google VsVividown 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown First case in whichan ISP hasbeensentencedfor a user-generatedcontent 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  16. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities ANFoV – Associazione per la Convergenza nei Servizi di Comunicazione 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers AHR – Associazione Hosters e Registrars 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP – Associazione Italiana Internet Provider 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI - Global Network Initiative 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  17. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities Methodologyof the analysis: the 5C matrix 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers 1. Constitution 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 2. Coverage 3. Content 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 4. Compliance 6. Conclusions 5. Communication Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  18. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities Methodologyof the analysis: the 5C matrix 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers 5C Matrix 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown Dephtinterviews 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions 5C+ approach Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  19. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 1. Constitution 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers ANFoV Last version: 1997 – no update AHR Last version: 2004 – no update 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP Last version: 1997 – almostabandoned 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI Last version: 2010 – everyyear update Compulsoryreports 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  20. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 2. Coverage 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers ANFoV Telematicservices AHR Hosting web – domain nameregistrars 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP Internet accessproviders 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI Internet operatorsallover the world Multi-stakeholderorganization 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  21. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. Content 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers ANFoV Responsibility information, guardianshipofminors and privacy AHR Competition, transparency, privacy, UGC traceability 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP Internet use promotion, competition, research, guardianshipofminors, privacy and humandignity 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI Freedomofexpression and privacy 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  22. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 4. Compliance 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers ANFoV No relevantsanctions, no referencestolaws AHR No relevantsanctions, norms and lawssection 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP No relevantsanctions, deep relation with consumer nationalnorms 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI No relevantsanctions, compliancewithInternational Laws 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  23. 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 5. Communication 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers ANFoV No relation with consumer association, privacy AHR No relation with consumer association 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown AIIP Deep relation with consumer association 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct GNI Relation with consumer associations, stakeholders at first place 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  24. 6. Conclusions 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities Lackofadequateregulations in Internet 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers Needofsharedself-regulationforms CompulsorinessofCodesofCunduct 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct Co-regulationforms 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

  25. 1. The Web 2.0. Whatischanged 2. The Internet Service Providers: definition and responsibilities 3. The self-regulation of the Internet Service Providers Thankyou 4. An emblematic case: Google Vs Vividown 5. The Internet Service Provider CodesofConduct 6. Conclusions Agata F.F.CerraSelf-Regulationof the Internet Service Provider

More Related