1 / 35

May 5, 2009

01/26/2010. May 5, 2009. 2. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement. Measure 1.1.1: District targets met Data Source: State mandated test results and Infinite Campus Target : 80 % of district targets will be met Frequency: Annually

trixie
Download Presentation

May 5, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 01/26/2010 May 5, 2009

  2. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 2

  3. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.1: District targets met Data Source: State mandated test results and Infinite Campus Target : 80% of district targets will be met Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of district-level targets met divided by total number of district targets Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design High School Transformation Middle School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis Analysis against district targets will be completed in August 2010 and included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 3

  4. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.2 APS/State Student Achievement – Reading CRCT Data Source: State mandated test results Target: 88% of students meet or exceed state standards Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 meeting or exceeding state standards in Reading divided by total number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 taking the Reading CRCT Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Middle School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 4

  5. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.3 APS/State Student Achievement – English/Language Arts CRCT Data Source: State mandated test results Target: 88% of students meet or exceed state standards Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 meeting or exceeding state standards in English/Language Arts divided by total number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 taking the English/lLanguage Arts CRCT Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Middle School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 5

  6. Objective1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.4 APS/State Student Achievement – Mathematics CRCT Data Source: State mandated test results Target: 76% of students meet or exceed state standards Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 meeting or exceeding state standards in Mathematics divided by total number of students in traditional schools in grades 1-8 taking the Mathematics CRCT Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Middle School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 6

  7. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.5: APS/State Student Achievement – Science CRCT Data Source: State mandated test results Target: 68% of students meet or exceed state standards Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students in traditional schools in grades 3-8 meeting or exceeding state standards in Science divided by total number of students in traditional schools in grades 3-8 taking the Science CRCT Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Middle School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 7

  8. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.6: APS/State Student Achievement on the GHSGT – Grade 11 First Time Test Takers Data Source: State mandated test results Target: 4 content areas in which students show improvement Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students in traditional schools at or above state average in each of the 4 content areas divided by total number of students in traditional schools Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design High School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Secondary Literacy Initiatives Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 8

  9. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.7a: Absenteeism – Elementary Data Source: Infinite Campus Target: 13% or less of elementary students missing 10 or more days Frequency: Quarterly* *Quarters are defined from the opening of the students’ school year. Calculation Method: Number of students absent 10 or more days (excused and unexcused) divided by the student population at the elementary school level Supporting Initiatives: School Improvement Plans Atlanta Fulton-County Attendance Protocol Communities In Schools Weed and Seed Truancy Intervention Project Social Work Services Performance Analysis Second quarter benchmarks indicate that elementary schools are on target for meeting the goal of 13% or less of students missing 10 or more days. The semi-annual cumulative absenteeism rate is 3.8%. Percent of Students Absent 10 or More Days This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 9

  10. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.7b: Absenteeism – Middle Data Source: Infinite Campus Target: 12% or less of middle school students missing 10 or more days Frequency: Quarterly* *Quarters are defined from the opening of the students’ school year. Calculation Method: Number of students absent 10 or more days (excused and unexcused) divided by the student population at the middle school level Supporting Initiatives: School Improvement Plans Middle School Transformation Atlanta-Fulton County Attendance Protocol Communities In Schools Weed and Seed Truancy Intervention Project Social Work Services Performance Analysis Second quarter benchmarks indicate that middle schools are on target for meeting the goal of 12% or less of students missing 10 or more days. The semi-annual cumulative absenteeism rate is 4.4%. Percent of Students Absent 10 or More Days This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 10

  11. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.7c: Absenteeism – High Data Source: Infinite Campus Target: 40% or less of high school students missing 10 or more days Frequency: Quarterly* *Quarters are defined from the opening of the students’ school year. Calculation Method: Number of students absent 10 or more days (excused and unexcused) divided by the student population at the high school level Supporting Initiatives: School Improvement Plans High School Transformation Social Work Services Atlanta Fulton-County Attendance Protocol Communities In Schools Weed and Seed Truancy Intervention Project NOTE: The data and projections will not include North and South Psychoeducational Centers, Forest Hills Academy, West End Academy and Crim Open Campus. Performance Analysis Second quarter benchmarks indicate that high schools are on target for meeting the goal of 40% or less of students missing 10 or more days. The semi-annual cumulative absenteeism rate is 17.1%. Percent of Students Absent 10 or More Days This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010

  12. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.8: Graduation Rate Data Source: Georgia Governor's Office of Student Achievement Target: 71% of 9th grade students graduating from high school in 4 years Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Georgia Governor's Office of Student Achievement Calculation Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Mathematics and Science Initiative Project GRAD High School Transformation Middle School Transformation Destination College Graduation Coaches Performance Analysis Data will be available following the receipt of the State report in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 12

  13. Objective 1.1: Improve Student Achievement Measure 1.1.9: Schools meeting Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Data Source: State mandated test results, Infinite Campus, and Georgia Governor's Office of Student Achievement Target: 82% of district schools meeting AYP Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of schools meeting AYP standards divided by total number of schools in the district Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Middle School Transformation High School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Math and Science Initiative Single-Gender Academies Destination College Graduation Coaches Project GRAD Performance Analysis District and school level reports will be available in August 2010. Analysis of the data will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 13

  14. Objective 1.2: Improve Teacher Effectiveness Measure 1.2.1: Teachers’ effective implementation of the 26 Teaching Expectations Data Source: Instructional audit results Target: 83% of the teaching expectations that were observed received a rating of meets or exceeds on APS Teaching Expectations Frequency:Semi-Annually Calculation Method: Number of observed teaching expectations that met or exceeded expectations (on the APS Teaching Expectations observation instrument) divided by the total number of observed teaching expectation ratings Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Math and Science Initiative Middle School Transformation High School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis A total of 665 teachers were observed, resulting in 17,290 teaching expectation ratings. Of the number of teaching expectations observed, 77% were scored with met or exceeded expectations. This target is not on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 14

  15. Objective 1.2: Improve Teacher Effectiveness Measure 1.2.2: Teachers’ effective use of technology as one of the 26 Teaching Expectations Data Source: Instructional audit results Target: 80% of teaching expectations observed received a rating of meets or exceeds in the use of technology on APS Teaching Expectations Frequency:Semi-Annually Calculation Method: Number of observed teaching expectations that met or exceeded expectations in the use of technology (on the APS Teaching Expectations observation instrument) divided by the total number of observed teaching expectation ratings in the use of technology Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive School Reform Design Math and Science Initiative Middle School Transformation High School Transformation INsight (Instructional Management System) Single-Gender Academies Performance Analysis A total of 656 teachers were observed. Of the number of teaching expectations observed, 67% of the teachers observed were scored with met or exceeded expectations in the use of technology. This target is not on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 15

  16. Objective 1.3: Increase Community Engagement Measure 1.3.1: School partnerships meeting agreed objectives Data Source: Principals' reports Target: 90% of school partnerships meeting agreed objectives Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Total number of partnerships that met agreed objectives divided by total number of partnerships Supporting Initiatives: Principal for a Day Atlanta Education Fund Performance Analysis Principals report 96% of schools are on track to meet their partnership goals. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 16

  17. Objective 1.3: Increase Community Engagement Measure 1.3.2: Targeted community groups addressed (Neighborhood Planning Units (NPUs), Faith-Based, Government, Civic, Businesses, Community-Based, Women, and Professional) Data Source: Reports from Superintendent and Cabinet members Target: 89 groups addressed by Cabinet Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of community groups addressed by Superintendent and Cabinet Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis During the first and second quarters (July 2009 – December 2009), staff have addressed 43 community groups. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 17

  18. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010

  19. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010

  20. Objective 1.3: Increase Community Engagement Measure 1.3.3: Perception of APS by stakeholders Data Source: AEF/APS Parent Survey conducted by the Atlanta Education Fund Target: 73% of parents giving APS an A or B rating on the APS Parent Survey Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Percent of parents giving APS an A or B rating on the AEF/APS Parent Survey Supporting Initiatives: Comprehensive Communications Plan Performance Analysis The Office of Communications will collect data from the AEF/APS Parent Survey in May of 2010. The results from the survey will be presented in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 20

  21. Objective 1.4: Ensure High Quality Safe, Secure Facilities Measure 1.4.1: Implementation of regulatory inspection recommendations Data Source: Inspection Reports Target: 100% of accepted regulatory corrective action plans implemented Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of corrective action plans implemented divided by the total number of adopted corrective action plans Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis The Operations Division has accepted 30 regulatory inspections corrective action plans. To date, the division has implemented 21 of 30 (70%) of the corrective action plans. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 21

  22. Objective 2.1: Strategically Manage and Leverage Technology Measure 2.1.1a: Accessibility and stability of technology infrastructure and systems Data Source: Technology Refresh Plan Target: 80% of school administrative office sites with new workstations installed Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: The total number of school administrative offices with new workstations installed divided by the total number of school administrative offices Supporting Initiatives: N/A • Performance Analysis • A total of 83 administrative office sites have been • targeted for upgrade with new workstations. Of • those, 31% (26) are complete. • This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 22

  23. Objective 2.1: Strategically Manage and Leverage Technology Measure 2.1.1b: Accessibility and stability of technology infrastructure and systems Data Source: Wireless Deployment Plan Target: 50% of schools with complete wireless access Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: The number of schools with complete wireless access divided by the total number of schools in the district Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis Fifty (50) schools are targeted for full wireless access this school year. Full wireless access has been installed in 11 (11%) of our schools. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 23

  24. Objective 2.2: Ensure Fiscal Responsibility and Stability Measure: 2.2.1: Unqualified audit opinions (state and external) Data Source: Annual audit reports from Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC and Georgia Department of Audits Target: 100% of Audits receive an Unqualified Opinion Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Opinion Letter Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis The FY 2008 Financial Audit Report by the Georgia Department of Audits was issued 10/08/2009 with an unqualified opinion. The FY 2008 Financial Audit Report by the external auditor, Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC, was issued 11/06/2009 with an unqualified opinion. The FY 2009 Financial Audit Report by the external auditor, Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC, is expected to be issued by the end of February 2010 with an unqualified opinion. FY 2008 target has been met. FY 2009 target is on track to be meet. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 24

  25. Objective 2.3: Align Resources with Strategic Priorities Measure 2.3.1: Spending directed to instruction Data Source: Lawson Target: 71% of General Fund Budget spent on instruction Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Actual Expenditures allocated to instruction divided by total expenditures Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis At the end of the reporting period (12/31/2009), FY 2010 spending directed to instruction of the actual unaudited expenditures is 65% of total actual expenditures. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 25

  26. Objective 3.1: Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness of District Processes Measure 3.1.1: Process improvements implemented Data Source: Manual data collection Target: 2 process improvements Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of identified process improvements Supporting Initiatives: Cross-functional Action Teams Performance Analysis Two identified process improvement studies are complete. The two identified processes are Records Management and High School Transformation process documentation. This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 26

  27. Objective 3.1: Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness of District Processes Measure 3.1.2: Student breakfast participation Data Source: Horizon Nutrition System Target: 34.6% of students participating in the student breakfast program Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of students participating in the breakfast program divided by total number of students Supporting Initiatives: Breakfast in the Classroom – Elementary/Middle Schools Grab and Go Breakfast – Middle/High Schools Performance Analysis The overall student participation rate for August through December of 2009 is 36%. This rate represents an increase of 5.4% from SY09. This target is on track to be met.        Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 27

  28. Objective 3.1: Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness of District Processes Measure 3.1.3: Athletic Audit Recommendations Data Source: Corrective Action Plan Target: 51% of the total number of accepted athletic audit recommendations implemented Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Total number of accepted athletic audit recommendations implemented divided by total number of accepted athletic audit recommendations Supporting Initiatives: Athletic Audit Performance Analysis A total of 35 (51%) athletic audit recommendations will be implemented this year. Of those, 25 (37%) have been completed or are in progress. Athletic Audit Recommendations This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 28

  29. Objective 3.2: Improve Internal and External Customer Service Measure 3.2.1: Schools satisfaction with targeted district business units Data Source: Principal Satisfaction Survey Target: 95% units receiving targeted satisfaction score of 3 or better on a 5 point scale Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: total number of business units receiving targeted satisfaction score of 3 or better on a 5 point scale divided by number of business units participating in the survey Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis Measure results will be compiled through a survey of customer satisfaction expected to be administered in mid-July/early August 2010. Results will be reported in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 29

  30. Objective 4.1: Increase Employee Capacity and Leadership • Measure • 4.1.1: Job-related training for district instructional employees (Georgia Performance Standards (GPS), secondary math, and leadership training) • Data Source: Professional Development Survey • Target: Baseline • Frequency: Annually • Calculation Method: Number of instructional employees who agree that the training topics were relevant to their profession divided by the number of instructional employees receiving training • Supporting Initiatives: • Professional Development Management System • High School Transformation • Middle School Transformation • Math and Science Initiative Performance Analysis This is a baseline year so the data will not be available until the end of this fiscal year. Results from the analysis of the data will be reported in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 30

  31. Objective 4.1: Increase Employee Capacity and Leadership • Measure • 4.1.2: Job-related training for district non-instructional employees (including leadership training) • Data Source: Professional Development Survey • Target: Baseline • Frequency: Annually • Calculation Method: Number of non-instructional employees who agree that the training topics were relevant to their profession divided by the number of non-instructional employees receiving training • Supporting Initiatives: • Professional Development Management System Performance Analysis This is a baseline year so the data will not be available until the end of this fiscal year. Results from the analysis of the data will be reported in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 31

  32. Objective 4.2: Increase Employee Engagement Measure 4.2.1: Absenteeism rate per employee (sick and unapproved leave) Data Source: Lawson Human Resource System Target: 43% of staff missing 5 or more days Frequency: Quarterly Calculation Method: Employees missing five or more days (sick and unapproved leave) divided by total full-time employees Supporting Initiatives: N/A • Performance Analysis • 22% of employees have missed 5 or more days. • *Note: The Semi-Annual percentage is cumulative. • This target is on track to be met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 32

  33. Objective 4.3: Improve Recruitment and Retention of Quality Staff Measure 4.3.1: Teacher positions vacant at the end of each quarter Data Source: Position Control and Lawson Target: Less than 1% of total teaching positions Frequency: Quarterly Calculation Method: Number of teaching vacancies divided by the number of teaching positions Supporting Initiatives: Recruitment TRIP (Teacher Recruitment Improvement Process) Teacher Retention Initiative Performance Analysis At the end of the first quarter there is a total of 27 vacancies in the district which represents .7% of all teaching positions. *Note: The number of vacancies for SRT 2 includes 1 vacancy for Forrest Hills. This target has been met. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 33

  34. Objective 4.3: Improve Recruitment and Retention of Quality Staff Measure 4.3.2:Novice classroom teachers (0-3 years) retained, excluding Teach for America and terminations Data Source: Lawson Human Resources System Target: 61% cohort retained Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: Number of novice teachers retained divided by total number of novice teachers Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis Data for novice classroom teachers (0-3 years) retained will be included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 34

  35. Objective 4.4: Build a Culture of Alignment and Accountability Measure 4.4.1: Utilization of the APS Strategic Management System by district staff Data Source: Office of Strategy/Development and APS Senior Leadership Target: Baseline Frequency: Annually Calculation Method: # of strategic management systems engaged in by district staff Supporting Initiatives: N/A Performance Analysis The Strategy and Development Division is working with all APS divisions to increase district staff engagement with APS strategic management systems (project management, strategic planning/BSC, process improvement, and data governance/quality). Data will be collected, analyzed and included in the annual report. Semi-Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 35

More Related