20 likes | 174 Views
Implications. . Establish the safety and efficacy of prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI in this registry pathway trialProof of Concept: Does an agent that has higher inhibition of platelet aggregation and less
E N D
1. 1 STUDY DESIGN To answer this question, we are currently recruiting up to 850 sites for participation in a global phase 3 trial of prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes with planned PCI, called TRITON-TIMI 38.
This trial will enroll 13,000 patients across the ACS spectrum. Patients will be randomized to either prasugrel or standard doses of clopidogrel. Patients will be followed on maintenance therapy for a median of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the composite of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke. Important secondary endpoints include bleeding, recurrent ischemia and urgent target vessel revascularization.
Thank you for your attention.
To answer this question, we are currently recruiting up to 850 sites for participation in a global phase 3 trial of prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes with planned PCI, called TRITON-TIMI 38.
This trial will enroll 13,000 patients across the ACS spectrum. Patients will be randomized to either prasugrel or standard doses of clopidogrel. Patients will be followed on maintenance therapy for a median of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the composite of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke. Important secondary endpoints include bleeding, recurrent ischemia and urgent target vessel revascularization.
Thank you for your attention.