1 / 28

Συνάντηση στη Θεσσαλονίκη Meeting Thessaloniki June 2011

Συνάντηση στη Θεσσαλονίκη Meeting Thessaloniki June 2011. Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra. Daphne 3 Designing and Impact of the programme. Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra. SUMMARY. 1. Aims. 2. Beneficiaries.

tucker
Download Presentation

Συνάντηση στη Θεσσαλονίκη Meeting Thessaloniki June 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ΣυνάντησηστηΘεσσαλονίκηMeeting Thessaloniki June 2011 Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra

  2. Daphne 3 Designing and Impact of the programme Spanish Team R. Ortega, R. Del Rey, J. A. Casas & J. Calmaestra

  3. SUMMARY 1. Aims 2. Beneficiaries 3. Sessions and Contents 4. Materials 5. Developing time 6. Impact evaluation 7. Conclusions

  4. Name of theeducationalprogramme Programa Psicoeducativo sobre el uso de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y las Redes Sociales Psychoeducational program on the use of Information Technology and Communication and Social Networks

  5. 1. Aims • Demonstrating the importance of a good knowledge of ICT, Internet and social networks to make good and fitted use of them. • Provide an understandable body of concepts and basic operations of digital tools to make a safe and healthy use of them. • Encourage the development of a plan of action,embedded in the legislative documents of the school, in situations of risk in the use of ICT in discharged which the main strategies. • Promote and raise a positive and beneficial safe use of ICT • To promote the reflection on the importance of ICT among young people’s lives.

  6. 2. Beneficiaries • Direct beneficiaries • 3 schools • 590 Students • 150 Families • 110 teachers

  7. 3. Sessions and Contents • Depending on the target population towards the intervention was aimed(students, teachers and families), it had differential features, sharing similar global objectives, but adjusting to the perspective of each of the groups or recipients to whom it is addressed. • The contents are divided into three parts or blocks: • What are the Internet and Social Networks? • Benefits of using the Internet and Social Networks • Risks of using Internet and Social Networks

  8. 3. Sessions and Contents STUDENT SESSIONS Session 1: What does ICT mean for you?And the social networks? Session 2: Are you still out of social networks? Session 3: Our plan of action Session 4: How can the internet help me? Session 5: Do you help? Do you get help? Do they understand you? Do you understand them? Session 6: What do we do in the internet and why it may damage us? Session 7: Risks and advantages Session 8: The webquest: http://www.webquest.es/wq/webquest-conred-programa-psicoeducativo-sobre-el-uso-de-las-tecnologias-de-la-informacion-y-la-co

  9. 3. Sessions and Contents Families: Social Networks: A new environment of relationships Teachers: Living together with young people, living in social networks

  10. 4. Materials • Direct programme: • Student: power point files with links to sort videos to help the students for the understanding. • Families: power point files with links to sort videos to help the families for the understanding , a list of recourses and the EMICI protocol • Teachers: power point files with links to sort videos to help the teachers for the understanding , a list of recourses and the EMICI protocol • Dissemination : • Posters, bookmarks, stickers, leaflets for students, families and teachers

  11. 5. Developing time

  12. 6. Impact evaluation

  13. Participants PreTest PosTest 3 secondary schools 820 students Age (M): 14.41 • 3 secondary schools. • 893 students • Age (M): 14.45

  14. Participants Experimental Group Control Group 3 secondary schools 296 students Age (M): 14.92 • 3 secondary schools. • 595 students • Age (M): 14.74

  15. Participants

  16. INSTRUMENTS

  17. Results: Bullying Control Group

  18. Results: Bullying Experimental Group

  19. Results: Bullying Roles Control Group

  20. Bullying Roles Experimental Group

  21. Results: Cyberbullying Control Group

  22. Cyberbullying Experimental Group

  23. Cyberbullying Roles Control Group

  24. Cyberbullying Roles Experimental Group

  25. Perceived Control Information *

  26. CERI Control Group

  27. CERI Experimental Group

  28. 7. Conclusions • Decreasing: • Bullying and Cyberbullying level • Cyberbullying prevalence • Interpersonal addition to Internet • Perceived Control Information • To do in the next future: • Go deeply to the analysis and explore possible related variables, i.e. duration of the intervention. • Criteria for implication

More Related