60 likes | 176 Views
EUNIS habitat classification 2012 > G - Woodland and forest habitats and other wooded land > G1 - Broadleaved deciduous woodland > G1.6 - Fagus woodland > G1.62 - Atlantic acidophilous Fagus forests. Atlantic acidophilous Fagus forests. May be protected by none. Description.
E N D
EUNIS habitat classification 2012 > G - Woodland and forest habitats and other wooded land > G1 - Broadleaved deciduous woodland > G1.6 - Fagus woodland > G1.62 - Atlantic acidophilous Fagusforests Atlantic acidophilous Fagus forests May be protected by none Description EUNIS habitat type (code G1.62) ProtectedbyCoEBern Convention Equivalenthabitattype in EU HabitatsDirective English name Atlantic acidophilous beech forests Fagussylvaticaor Fagussylvatica-Quercusspp. forests developed on acid soils of the Atlantic domaine of Western Europe, differing from the forests of unit G1.61 by, in particular, the absence of Luzulaluzuloidesand a greater abundance of Ilex aquifolium. They may also contain Taxusbaccata. Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History
Covered by the following habitat types in international legal instruments and agreements Legalinstrument Habitat type legal name Habitat type legal code i i Clickable: goes to related habitat type in EUNIS appl. Clickable: goes to legal text Goes to the EUNIS Reference about the legal text Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History
Relation to vegetation types (syntaxa) The content of this table will be replaced with the new version, based on sparql table http://taskman.eionet.europa.eu/issues/10131 Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History
The columns Abundance, Frequencies, Faithfulness always seem to be empty in current EUNIS. If that is the case please remove them in the new version. If you find content, please post export and show in the ticket. We need to understand if it should be kept. If Biogeographic region field is always the same (...not detailed in original data set), please remove the field. Can we have the same Gallery and List implementation for the species here as in Species factsheets? In that case, please keep Comment field (is it always the same)...????? CHECK Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History
Relationship with other classifications Classification Code Relationship type Habitat type name For relationship to plant communities (syntaxa), see Vegetation types Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History
Classification Code Relationship type Habitat type name If ”Source” in Relationship type field can always go on top, it would be nice. Vegetation types Other classifications Legal instruments Species History