1 / 4

Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / 2005

P. A. A. Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / 2005. 2. Mathematics part B Calculation rules for fault risk assessment and cpk-monitoring. Risk figure R k. Calculate the risk figure Rk Significance of anomalies 1 = 6 < ki < 10; 3 = 10 < ki ≤ 100; 9 = ki > 100

tyler-hill
Download Presentation

Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P A A Part Average AnalysisPAA Rev. 2.0 / 2005 2. Mathematics part BCalculation rules for fault risk assessment and cpk-monitoring http://www.paa-web.de

  2. Risk figure Rk • Calculate the risk figure Rk Significance of anomalies 1 = 6 < ki < 10;3 = 10 < ki ≤ 100;9 = ki > 100 • Relevance of observed parameters (type)(U, I, t, ....), depends on the circuit design 9 = Clear indication of technical defect (Leacage current, Voltage Drop)3 = High probability to indicate technical defect (default value) 2 = Low probability to indicate technical defect 1 = Less relevance • The relevance should be selected by the development engineers http://www.paa-web.de

  3. Risk figure Rk • Rk calculation, select component if RK 9 • Statistical Process Analysis (SPA)cpk – monitoring for systematic failure detection • The focus of the PAA is the detection of stochastical failures in standard processes. Systematical failures in manufacturing processes can be observed by a wide range of parameter distribution () or continuous parameter drifts which lead to a reduction of the process ability characteristics cp and cpk. (VDA 4) • For instance, ceramic capacitors can break by mistakes in the SMD assembly or in thermal processes with which the signal / noise ratio decreases and thus the distribution of the characteristic voltage values shows burglary cp-and cpk values. In this case the decreased cpk value with <1.67 is an unequivocal indicator for a preinjured product. • With local cpk values < 2 and a symmetrical parameter distribution the quality of abnormal parts detection by PAA will be reduced. Notice, it has turned out suitable to calculate the local cpk value in supplement to the PAA, and to submit to a monitoring as in the following is described. • The following definitions are based on standard processes with N  400 and Mlokal 20 for all measuring parameters http://www.paa-web.de

  4. Risk figure Rk • Calculation of the local gliding cpk value cpk (local) = MIN(cpk, USL (local); cpk, LSL (local)) • For cpk (local) < 1.67 index (red):Process ability is insufficient; corrective action items should be defined. The product must be seperated in a stock, and can be requalified as good part by screening methods or by risk evaluation of the quality engineers, when the real cause for the bad cpk value has been found out. • For cpk (local)  2.0 index (green): Process ability is sufficient. • For 1.67 < cpk (local) < 2 index (yellow):Process ability is poor; corrective action items should be defined. In case, that there is no valid reglementation it is allowed to ship the product to the customer. But it is neccessary to sign up the product for a good tracebility in prevention of possible later reclaims. When the quality is recorded please give a hint, that the PAA observation level was reduced. http://www.paa-web.de

More Related