330 likes | 471 Views
Persuasion. You are feeling very sleeepy…. Bumper Stickers - “I’ll give up my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.” Billboards - “Get U.S. out of the U.N.” Magazine Ads - “Think different” Television Ads - “Got Milk?”
E N D
Persuasion You are feeling very sleeepy…
Bumper Stickers - “I’ll give up my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.” Billboards - “Get U.S. out of the U.N.” Magazine Ads - “Think different” Television Ads - “Got Milk?” Radio Ads - “This program is brought to you by Exxon, working for a better environment” T- shirts - “No Nukes” Lawn Placards - “Vote for Kaine” Mailings, etc. 300 to 400 appeals/day from marketers alone
What are attitudes? • ABCs of attitudes • Affective: evaluations are based on positive and negative emotions associated with a target • Behavioral: a behavioral tendency to act in a certain manner towards the attitude object • Cognitive: evaluations based on beliefs & facts
"Mmmmm... Gummi Beer." Affective Evaluation Beer Homer Simpson’s Attitudes Toward Beer Homer’s Attitude Toward Beer "Homer no function beer well without." Behavior Regarding Beer Cognitions Regarding Beer “To alcohol, the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." "The other day, I was so desperate for a beer, I snuck into the football stadium and ate the dirt under the bleachers."
Consistency in persuasion • Balance theory (Heider) - we are motivated to have harmony in our views and behaviors - we want to agree with people we like a disagree with those we don’t Think of someone you respect / like. What if they expressed an opinion you opposed? • Could change your feelings for the person • Could change your opinion on the issue
Michelle Michelle Michelle Teacher Teacher Teacher - + + - Michelle Teacher + + - - + + - - Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Balance TheoryBalanced Situations
Michelle Michelle Michelle Teacher Teacher Teacher - - + + Michelle Teacher - + + - + + - - Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Legalized abortion Balance TheoryImbalanced Situations
Consistency in persuasion • Cognitive dissonance theory - we will work to resolve inconsistencies in our beliefs and actions when they matter to us - changing a behavior can change an attitude (and vice versa) Changes in attitudes occur primarily when we perceive justification – e.g., free will in determining our (inconsistent) actions
Ready to turn some pegs?? • Students spent hour turning pegs in holes (really boring) • Paid either $1 or $20 • Who enjoyed the task more (when asked later)? • Why $1 people $20 was justification enough, $1 wasn’t – I must have really liked turning pegs! (Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959)
Insufficient justification Attitude change happens when one freely performs an attitude-discrepant act for an inadequate reward.
Initiation Amplification Motivation Reduction Dissonance begins with: More dissonance arises when the action or decision: Dissonance is experienced as: Dissonance is reduced through: is seen as freely chosen. actionor decision that conflicts w/ impt. aspect of self. Can’t be justified as due to strong reward or threat unpleasant arousal. change designed to remove the unpleasant arousal. produces negative consequences that were foreseeable cannot be withdrawn
What affects how consistent we are? • Arousal • Tranquilizers cause people to not change their opinions • Preference for consistency • Consequences • More impact of your behavior = more likely you will be to change your attitudes • Salience of inconsistency
Consistent with what? Individualist “me” focused Collectivist group focused
Persuasion change in private attitude or belief as a result of receiving a message Dual Process Model - takes into account two ways attitude change takes place - e.g., central vs. peripheral processing, systematic vs. heuristic processing, etc. Certain information is processed more deeply than other info
Persuasion Attempt Audience Factors Processing Approach Persuasion Outcome Deep processing, focused on the quality of the message arguments. High motivation and ability to think about the message Lasting change that resists fading and counterattack Message Temporary change that that is susceptible to fading and counterattack Superficial processing, focused on surface features, e.g.: communicator’s attractiveness or number of arguments Low motivationor ability to think about the message
“Retirement planning can be a way to stay ahead of the game.” Cris Carter Schwab Investor Central or Peripheral?
Who says... What... By what means... To whom? • Channel • spoken • written • audio • Video • Communicator • Credibility • expertise • trustworthiness • Attractiveness • Message content • Reason vs. emotion • Discrepancy • One vs. two-sided • Audience • Need for Cognition
Who says? • Communicator • Credibility • expertise • trustworthiness • Attractiveness • Credibility: believability • expertise: the amount of knowledge the source is assumed to have • trustworthiness: the perceived intention of the communicator to deceive. • Perceived expertise • Begin by saying things the audience agrees with • Be introduced as someone knowledgeable on the topic • Speak confidently (no stuttering), and quickly
Class Demonstration • Message on Phosphate containing detergents • Source • Government Agency • Soap Company
Who says? • Attractiveness: • having qualities that appeal to an audience • physical appeal • likeability • perceived similarity • surface characteristics (Dembroski and others, 1978) • attitudes & values • Persuasive on matters of subjective preference (e.g., aspirin, soft drinks) • Communicator characteristics less relevant when the subject matter is important to participants
Agreement with the message Low personal relevance High personal relevance (Petty et al., 1981)
The Sleeper Effect Expert source % attitude change Nonexpert source Time interval (Hovland & Weiss, 1951)
Message content • Reason vs. emotion • Discrepancy • One vs. two-sided What is said? • Is a carefully reasoned message more persuasive, or one that arouses emotion? • Will you be more persuasive by advocating an extreme point of view, or by advocating a moderate position? • Should your message be one-sided, or should it acknowledge two points of view?
Is a carefully reasoned message more persuasive, or one that arouses emotion? (Dabbs & Janis, 1965)
Fear and Persuasion • http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/the_daily_show/videos/stephen_colbert/index.jhtml?playVideo=12615
2. Extreme or moderate point of view? Discrepancy interacts with communicator credibility Opinion change Discrepancy (Aronson et al., 1963)
3. One-sided or Two-sided? The interaction of initial opinion with one- versus two-sidedness Opinion change The message (Hovland et al., 1949)
By What Means… Opinion change • Channel • spoken • written • audio • Video Channel type (Chaiken & Eagly, 1978)
Audience • Need for Cognition To Whom? (Cacioppo et al., 1973)