1 / 16

Species Spread and Producer Responses

Species Spread and Producer Responses. David Adamson and Daniel Quiggin. Background. Pest m anagement is part of the decision making process for producers Crop choices and pest control decisions made jointly $2,342 million spent by landowners annually on pest control (ABS, 2008).

tynice
Download Presentation

Species Spread and Producer Responses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Species Spread and Producer Responses David Adamson and Daniel Quiggin

  2. Background • Pest management is part of the decision making process for producers • Crop choices and pest control decisions made jointly • $2,342 million spent by landowners annually on pest control (ABS, 2008)

  3. Background • Pests occur in an agricultural landscape • Hence the need to understand how they move and what impact they can have • Until both the distribution and density of a pest through time and space are understood, management expenditure may be misallocated (Adamson, 1996)

  4. Literature • Chalak, Pannell and Polyakov (2011) • Optimal level of pest control • Epanchin-Niell and Wilen (2010) • Optimal method of pest control

  5. Limitations of existing models • “Rook Contiguity” – pest can move in four directions (North, South, East, West) • Pests can only spread to adjacent cells • Uniform density of infestation

  6. Our Model • Removes rook contiguity • Pest can move in nine directions, including worsening the infestation in the origin cell • Non-uniform density • Pests have four levels of infestation (None, Low, Medium, Heavy) • Maximum range of pest increased to five cells • Two commodities • Only one subject to pest damage • Control taken as given • focus is on the effect of implementing the ability to switch commodities

  7. Pest Spread • Pest originates in a single cell (with low density) • Spreads to surrounding cells with an assigned probability (can also worsen its own infestation with the same probability) • Once new cells are infested, they also have probabilities of spreading • Eventually, all cells in landscape subject to high-density infestation • This is the equilibrium state with control expenditure • Model yields estimated cost of pest introduction

  8. Key concept: Jump-Point Diffusion • With a low probability of spread, it can happen that pests end up far from the origin with nothing in between • Blackberries via birds • In this way, most of the landscape can be covered with low-density infestations • Once a cell becomes heavily infested, the spread can be rapid • Bypasses border controls

  9. Economic Evaluation • Landscape has two commodities • Could also represent different land conditions • Each cell represents one unit of one commodity • Cells have different values depending on infestation • Variable of interest is value of landscape, measured by aggregating value of cells • Gross Margin approach

  10. Control and Switching • Pest introduced • Only affects one commodity (say, potato bug in a landscape of potatoes and tomatoes) • Paper compares two scenarios • Control only (producers incur fixed control costs) • Control and switching

  11. Parameters • Cells valued as in table • Decline in value of Commodity 1 reflects cost of pest control • Producers will switch when the benefits of controlling the pest are outweighed by the (opportunity) costs • Economic Threshold (Headley)

  12. Results: Mean Simulated Land Value

  13. Results: Standard Deviation of Land Value

  14. Discussion • Analysis without commodity switching shows sharper decline and greater variance • In reality, farmers do switch commodities • Cost-benefit analysis without this option may thus be misleading

  15. Future Directions • Incorporating cost of capital • Net Margin vs Gross Margin • Monitoring and eradication • Interaction with Jump-Point Diffusion • Stochastic control • “Pests With Benefits” • Hunting or harvesting vertebrate pests

  16. Species Spread and Producer Responses David Adamson and Daniel Quiggin

More Related