70 likes | 244 Views
Bill Abriel Bee Bednar Biondo Biondi Arthur Cheng Stewart Levin. Next Generation 3D Imaging Models. 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. Window of opportunity for cooperative project. Computational Cost. 3-D two-ways elastic ?. Too expensive. 3-D two-ways acoustic. No need of
E N D
Bill Abriel Bee Bednar Biondo Biondi Arthur Cheng Stewart Levin Next Generation 3D Imaging Models
2005 2006 2007 2008 Window of opportunity for cooperative project Computational Cost 3-D two-ways elastic ? Too expensive 3-D two-ways acoustic No need of cooperative project 3-D one-way elastic 2.5-D two-ways elastic Years
2005 2006 2007 2008 Window of opportunity for cooperative project Computational Cost 3-D two-ways elastic 3-D two-ways elastic ? Too expensive 3-D two-ways acoustic No need of cooperative project 3-D one-way elastic 2.5-D two-ways elastic Years
“Geological Model Working Group” task • Design 3-D Elastic model that is: • Computable in 3-D as an acoustic model (e.g Vp, r) by the end of 2007 • Contains challenging and realistic structures (salt bodies and faults) and velocity variations (shallow gas, low-velocity under salt, overpressure) to test the limits of present and future 3-D seismic (acquisition and imaging) technologies • Contains 2-3 reservoirs with complex and realistic architecture and that produce interesting “AVO’’ effects when computed as an acoustic model (e.g. Vp, r) • Is ready for fluid-flow simulation and computation of elastic/acoustic time-lapse surveys • Identify in the 3-D Elastic model one or two 2-D slices: • Suitable for elastic 2.5-D modeling (single line of 3-D point source elastic modeling) • Suitable for non-seismic modeling/inversion, in particular for: • Gravity • Active-sources EM • Magneto-telluric • …..
“Geological Model Working Group” &“Numerical Modeling Working Group” • Determine parameters of 3-D Elastic model that define a realistic computational task and capture important features of the model: • Determine maximum frequency needed to resolve reservoir stratigraphy • Determine shot-aperture and recording time to capture all dips (overturned events?) present in the model • Determine spatial sampling to avoid spatial aliasing • Define model representation(s), software tools, and appropriate interfaces
SEG Convention WorkshopGoal: Gather momentum before and at SEG convention to secure wide support for the project (e.g. sign up 20-25 paying companies). • “Conceptual design” of 3-D elastic model • Cross-validation of numerical code against Delft physical model (ZMAART) • Organizational structure and legal framework • Detailed plan for computations (Grid vendors, spare time on companies clusters) • Initial plan for archival and distribution (including data compression) • Involved sister societies (SPE and AAPG) and non-seismic SEG members • Firm commitments by “founding members”
Objectives of this meeting • Finalize charter and membership of “Geological Model Working Group” • Agree on main elements of 3-D Elastic model (e.g. salt typology, reservoir stratigraphy, velocity anomalies) • Agree on main contributors to each of these elements • Agree on model representation and software tools. • Agree on time-table for “Geological Model Working Group” from now to SEG. • Make progress toward formation of “Numerical Modeling Working Group” • Make progress toward finalizing organizational structure of SEG Modeling Consortium • Discuss nominations for Project Manager position and agree on a recommendation to the Executive Committee of the SEG Modeling Consortium