190 likes | 327 Views
Age-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVELS. Michael A. Staiano 10 July 2006 STAIANO ENGINEERING, INC. ANNOYANCE RESPONSE. Public opinion polling of community annoyance Ambient noise survey of canvassed area. ANNOYANCE RESPONSE CURVE. WEIGHTING CURVES. EQUAL-LOUDNESS CONTOURS.
E N D
Age-WEIGHTEDSOUND LEVELS Michael A. Staiano 10 July 2006 STAIANO ENGINEERING, INC.
ANNOYANCE RESPONSE • Public opinion polling of community annoyance • Ambient noise survey of canvassed area
EQUAL-LOUDNESS CONTOURS Pure-tone response of 18-25-yr-old men and women
2006 U.S. POPULATION MEAN AGE: • Men and Women / All ages – 37 yr • Men and Women / ≥ 20 yr – 47 yr
HEARING LOSS • PRESBYCUSIS—aging • NOISE-INDUCED • occupational • sociacusis (every-day life) • NOSOACUSIS—disease, trauma, ototoxic drugs
EXPECTED HEARING LOSS 60-yr olds in industrial society but not exposed to workplace noise (OSHA 1983)
HEARING LOSS AGE-CORRECTION CURVES Hearing threshold re 20-yr-old males
NATURAL SOUNDS • Natural Sources: • Birds ≥ 2 kHz • Insects – cicadas ~1 kHz – crickets ~6 kHz • Ageing filters natural sounds relative to intruding noise?
CONCLUSION • A-weighting ageing error range: • 1 dB @ 40 yr • 2 dB @ 50 yr • 3 dB @ 60 yr • 4 dB @ 70 yr • Ageing relatively minor explanation for annoyance response variation