1 / 20

L A L I V E Avocats

Good Faith, Due Diligence and Acquisition of Title to Works of Art The Swiss Law Approach Carolyn Olsburgh. L A L I V E Avocats. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law INTRODUCTION. Titre Sous-titre. Purchase of a work of art from a person without title

ulric-wells
Download Presentation

L A L I V E Avocats

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good Faith, Due Diligence and Acquisition of Title to Works of Art The Swiss Law Approach Carolyn Olsburgh L A L I V E Avocats

  2. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law INTRODUCTION TitreSous-titre • Purchase of a work of art from a person without title • Conflict of interests: Original owner Subsequent purchaser • Civil law v. Common law systems Good faith has an effect on title (e.g. possibility to acquire title on a stolen object) L A L I V E Avocats

  3. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law INTRODUCTION TitreSous-titre • Issue: Good faith or bad faith of the purchaser? • Consequences on: • Original owner’s claim to recover the work of art • Acquisition of title by the purchaser L A L I V E Avocats

  4. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre Section I Was the purchaser in good or bad faith? L A L I V E Avocats

  5. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre Knowledge about the lack of title at the time of the purchase? Yes  bad faith No  good faith unless he should have known  bad faith L A L I V E Avocats

  6. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • 1. Relevant moment: at the time of the purchase • 2. Presumption of good faith (Art. 3(1) CC) • Burden of proof that there was no good faith: former owner • 3.No protection of the purchaser when: • He was in bad faith; or • His ignorance is due to the fact that he did not pay the required attention (Art. 3(2) CC) L A L I V E Avocats

  7. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • 4. Degree of attention: • Matter of appreciation • Objective test: honest man in the shoes of the purchaser? • 5. Duty to inform oneself about the title • General rule: only if « concrete reasons capable of putting the title into doubt  » • Exception: businesses/trade involving goods of doubtful origin(e.g., second-hand goods, antiques, art) L A L I V E Avocats

  8. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre On the art market: The purchaser must inform himself « when he should be suspicious given the circumstances » Higher standard of care Irrelevant factors: dealer/non-dealer; purpose of resale or not Relevant: knowledge of the market in question L A L I V E Avocats

  9. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre Original Manuscript of the Marquis de Sade(Swiss Supreme Court, 28 May 1998, SJ 1999 I 1) A (former owner) Stolen manuscript C (seller) Claim to recover manuscript France Sale of manuscript B (purchaser) D (intermediary renowned specialist in manuscripts) Switzerland L A L I V E Avocats

  10. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law I. NOTION OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • Solution for the case • Renowned intermediary (D) • Personal relationship between former owner (A) and seller (C) • High purchase price (= value according to expert) • BUT: Manuscript not delivered in a case • HELD: Good faith of B  A’s claim was dismissed. L A L I V E Avocats

  11. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II. CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD/BAD FAITH TitreSous-titre Section II Consequences of the distinction between good faith and bad faith L A L I V E Avocats

  12. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II. CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD/BAD FAITH TitreSous-titre • Issue 1 • Was the purchaser in good or in bad faith at the time of the purchase? • Bad faith: • object may always be recovered (Art. 936(1) CC) • no possibility to ever acquire title (Art. 728 CC) • Good faith: second stage of the reasoning L A L I V E Avocats

  13. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II.2 CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • Issue 2 • Was the possession lost willingly or unwillingly? • Object ‘subject to a bailment’ (‘entrusted object’): • object may never be recovered • immediate acquisition of title • Stolen/lost object: • object may be recovered during 1 year / 30 years • acquisition of title may occur after 30 years L A L I V E Avocats

  14. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II.2 CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • a) Object ‘subject to a bailment’ (‘entrusted object’) • Art. 933 • The good faith purchaser « must be protected in his acquisition, even if the transferor lacked capacity to pass title »(see also Art. 714(2) CC). • No claim is possible • Immediate acquisition of title L A L I V E Avocats

  15. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II.2 CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • b) Stolen or lost object – Claim (Art. 934 CC) • within one year after the owner becomes aware of the place where the cultural assetis located and the identity of the possessor, • but at the latest 30 years following its removal (new statute of limitations since 1st June 2005) • Against reimbursement if the object was bought at a market, at a public auction or from a dealer of objects of the same nature L A L I V E Avocats

  16. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law II.2 CONSEQUENCES OF GOOD FAITH TitreSous-titre • b) Stolen or lost object – Acquisition of title (Art. 728 CC) • Acquisition of title through operation of the limitation period • Peaceful and uninterrupted possession • During a period of 30 years (since 1st June 2005) L A L I V E Avocats

  17. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law CONCLUSION TitreSous-titre Good faith purchaser Bad faith purchaser Entrusted object Stolen/lost object Claim at any time No passing of title No claim Claim within 1 year / 30 years If market/ public auction/ dealer of objects of same nature: reimbursement of purchase price Immediate passing of title Passing of title after 30 years L A L I V E Avocats

  18. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law CONCLUSION TitreSous-titre • 1. Evolution in case-law • Stricter standards of good faith  more easily bad faith • No statute of limitations for claim to recover goods • No possible acquisition of title by purchaser • Security of transactions? • Security about title? L A L I V E Avocats

  19. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law CONCLUSION TitreSous-titre • 2. Recent amendment in the Swiss Civil Code • Longer limitation periods (for good faith purchasers of stolen/lost cultural assets) • Extension of the absolute limitation period to 30 years • Extension of the period required to obtain title through operation of law: 30 years •  Problem: discrepancy between relative limitation period of 1 yearand statute of limitations to acquire title L A L I V E Avocats

  20. Good Faith and Acquisition of Title – Swiss Law CONCLUSION TitreSous-titre • 3. Further steps in the future? • Art. 4(1) of the 1995 Unidroit Convention: • Good faith • Relevant for compensation, but not for the issue of title • Burden of proof lies on the current possessor L A L I V E Avocats

More Related