1 / 17

Math in Hudson

Math in Hudson. Board of Education October 10,2011. Take Aways. Summary of math in Hudson for the past two years What has been occurring at each level of instruction: elementary, middle school and high school Data, Data and Data Common Core Implementation timeline and process.

unity-munoz
Download Presentation

Math in Hudson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Math in Hudson Board of Education October 10,2011

  2. Take Aways • Summary of math in Hudson for the past two years • What has been occurring at each level of instruction: elementary, middle school and high school • Data, Data and Data • Common Core Implementation timeline and process

  3. Data: 2009-2010 Elementary: • Common Short Cycle Assessments • PLC full implementation: FOCUS time • Standards based report card • Math fact fluency implemented 3-5 Middle School • Common Short cycle assessments • Algebra I final to eighth grade IM 2 students High School • Implementation of McDougal Algebra I and Geometry • High school course alignment and pathways revised

  4. Data:2010-2011 Elementary • Preparation for common core: crosswalks completed • Kindergarten common core course of study written • Common Short Cycle Assessments continue Middle School • Common core crosswalk • Algebra I high school final administered to all students completing IM 2. • 7th grade average: 87% passage • 8th grade average: 75% passage • High School Algebra I: 70% passage High School • Algebra II McDougal Littell implemented • Math electives added to course pathway in math

  5. DATA: 2011-2012 Elementary • Common Core math curriculum writing • Consistency for time math fact fluency established grades 2-5 • Common Short Cycle Assessments continued Middle School • Common Core math curriculum writing • Common Core Short Cycle Assessments continued • Math textbook adoption process started • Continue to administer Algebra I final to all students completing IM 2 at the middle school • FOCUS time implemented High School • College Algebra course offered • Honors Pre-calculus course offered

  6. High School Algebra I 2010-2011 School Year: • 90 students were enrolled in Algebra I • 82 of the 90 students are freshman or 21% of the total freshman class • 7 of the 82 freshman were new to Hudson which represents 8% of total students enrolled in Algebra • 8 of the 82 freshman have a disability which represents 9% of total students enrolled in Algebra

  7. Data: High School Algebra I 2011-2012 School Year: • 70 students are enrolled in Algebra I • 67 of the 70 students are freshman or 16.6% of the total freshman class • 31 of the 70 freshman are new to Hudson which is 44% of the students enrolled in Algebra I • 12 of the 70 freshman in Algebra I have a disability which is 17% of the students enrolled in Algebra I

  8. Number of Algebra I courses Year Sections Freshman enrollment*beginning year 2011-2012 3 402 2010-2011 6 384 2009-2010 8 412 2008-2009 10 422 2007-2008 11 426 2006-2007 9 452 2005-2006 10 410 2004-2005 11 472 2003-2004 14* 439 2002-2003 15* 438 2001-2002 13*433 2000-2001 11*431 *pre-algebra courses included

  9. More Data!

  10. What other DATA?

  11. Hudson

  12. OGT Comparable Districts: High School

  13. OAA Comparable Districts: Middle School

  14. OAA Comparable Districts: Elementary Level • Grade 5 Math • District County Total Enrollment Number Tested Total % Passing Number of Students (Adv., Accel., Prof.) % Adv. % Accel. % Prof. % Basic % Limited • Mason City Warren 10,220 936 93.0 63.3 13.0 16.7 4.5 2.6 • Avon Lake City Lorain 3,615 293 92.5 48.8 16.4 27.3 5.5 2.1 • Mariemont City Hamilton 1,614 140 92.1 59.3 12.9 20.0 6.4 1.4 • Kenston Local Geauga 3,140 246 90.7 51.6 14.2 24.8 7.3 2.0 • Aurora City Portage 2,925 212 90.6 46.2 17.9 26.4 6.1 3.3 • Granville Exempt Village Licking 2,453 214 89.7 56.5 13.1 20.1 5.1 5.1 • Indian Hill Ex. Village Hamilton 2,070 153 88.9 62.8 14.4 11.8 8.5 2.6 • Brecksville-Broadview Hts. Cuyahoga 4,404 274 88.0 50.7 13.5 23.7 8.0 4.0 • Hudson City Summit 4,883 357 88.0 45.4 17.4 25.2 8.4 3.6 • Chagrin Falls Ex. Village Cuyahoga 1,919 167 87.4 44.3 16.8 26.4 7.2 5.4 • Springboro Community City Warren 5,276 490 86.5 40.2 17.6 28.8 8.8 4.7 • Forest Hills Local Hamilton 7,382 639 86.2 47.9 18.0 20.3 8.1 5.6 • Upper Arlington City Franklin 5,415 393 85.8 42.0 18.3 25.5 11.2 3.1 • Solon** Cuyahoga 5,188 391 85.2 52.2 10.5 22.5 10.5 4.4 • Madeira City Hamilton 1,408 113 85.0 42.5 21.2 21.2 5.3 9.7 • Revere Local Summit 2,784 202 84.7 48.0 15.8 20.8 9.4 5.9 • Olentany Local Delaware 14,116 1,377 84.2 44.2 15.4 24.7 10.8 5.0 • Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local Greene 2,618 204 83.8 46.1 17.7 20.1 10.8 5.4 • Centerville City Montgomery 7,975 603 82.6 45.6 11.8 25.2 11.4 6.0 • Perrysburg Ex. Village Wood 4,419 349 82.0 39.8 15.2 26.9 11.8 .6.3 • Loveland City Hamilton 4,534 340 77.9 46.8 12.4 18.8 14.1 7.9 • New Albany-Plain Local Franklin 3,943 363 77.1 36.4 17.1 23.7 12.4 10.5

  15. Take Aways • The district has heard our parents and changes have been made. • Common Core standards in mathematics have been adopted by the state of Ohio. • Mathematics courses of studies 1-8 being developed to begin transition to Common Core for 2012-2013 school year. • Middle School Math textbook adoption process started with implementation slated for 2012-2013. • We are all on the same team!

  16. Not broken • Do not have a 40% repeat rate for Algebra I at the high school. • Students are continuing to do well in multiple measures. • We constantly see ways to improve our delivery of instruction to meet the needs of students. • Benchmark with comparable districts: What are they doing? • Continue to help parents understand mathematics in our schools today. Working to increase parent resources (on-line support, parent nights etc...)

  17. Questions

More Related