ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE!!! MMAH …

ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE!!! MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…”

MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Source: 2006 OBC, Div. C, Part 3, “Qualifications”.

MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” The following pages were from the OBC, Div. C, Part 3, clearly showing these discrepancies in “licensing”, “registration and registration renewal requirements” and conditions for the suspension and/or revocation of licenses, etc.

MMAH… And Municipal (City) Employees… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Source: 2006 OBC, Div C, Part 3, Qualifications, p. 5

MMAH… And Municipal (City) Employees… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Source: 2006 OBC, Div C, Part 3, Qualifications, p. 6

MMAH… And Municipal (City) Employees… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” • Thus, for CBO and/or Inspectors (that would include building inspectors, plan reviewers, managers of code compliance, etc.), all that was required to be “qualified” was: • Take your exam(s) • Get on the Register • Pay your fees… Once you did that… then things got even easier… for those on municipal or CITY payrolls because renewal of a license – for these “qualified personnel” basically meant you needed only to get on the register and pay your fees each year!

MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Municipal Employees (on city payrolls) had NOTHING in the Ontario Building Code pertaining to Qualifications as far as: • Conditions for suspension and/or revocation of licenses (i.e., violation of the OBC and/or Act, unethical behaviors, misrepresentation of qualifications (i.e., acting as engineers when not engineers), etc.). • 2. Quality Management Plan that had to be followed during the performance of one’s duties in order to ensure activities were carried out in compliance with the OBC and/or Act and any other applicable laws (i.e., Municipal Act, Engineering Act of Ontario) and in order to ensure that inspections/issues, etc. were properly documented and matters referred to the CBO as necessary (i.e., plans approved when “not to code”, field issues where homes were allowed to be built when structurally unsound, etc.).

MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” But… what was required of Registered Code Agencies performing virtually identical functions pertaining to inspections, plan review, etc.?

MMAH…And Registered Code Agencies… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Source: 2006 OBC, Div C, Part 3, Qualifications, p. 18

MMAH… And A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Whether or not a person was a building inspector on a city payroll or a building inspector on the payroll of a Registered Code Agency, the functions they performed were virtually identical. As such, why the tremendous variance in “requirements” and/or conditions that had to be met in order to obtain and/or maintain a license? Why were there NO PROVISIONS whatsoever to ensure city employees were working in accordance with the OBC and/or Act? Why were there NO PROVISIONS whatsoever for suspending and/or revoking the license of municipal employees who could be violating the OBC and/or Act and the Engineering Act by practicing “engineering” without a license to do so? And why no provisions ANYWHERE at the PROVINCIAL level to ensure/verify municipalities were following the law!

MMAH… And A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…” Clearly, it was also evident in my opinion, that even though laws were made as they pertained to the role of City Councils (i.e., need for methods, procedures, policies, etc. to be in place), there was NO ONE ensuring that the laws were actually followed, as clearly evidenced by the virtually totally lacking methods, procedures and/or policies at City of Greater Sudbury Building Services department (information provided to former Minister of Justice Nicholson, Ontario Provincial Police and Sudbury Regional Police for investigation into breach of public trust – something ALL have apparently refused to investigate). If true, these allegations would surely be proof positive of breach of public trust. The Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) told me – in writing – that “in their opinion”, my issues were “civil” in nature. To this I responded, Breach of Public Trust is CRIMINAL and asked that they return to me the memory stick with the files I had provided to them via TRACKABLE mail! I STILL HAVE THAT ENVELOPE WHICH WAS RETURNED TO ME BY THE OPP - UNOPENED – PROOF POSITIVE OF WHAT THEY HAD BEEN GIVEN TO INVESTIGATE AS A CRIMINAL MATTER!!! ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE!!!

ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE!!! MMAH …