1 / 22

Gender and Educational Attainment in Schools

Gender and Educational Attainment in Schools. Stephen Machin and Sandra McNally. Girls doing much better!. Headline figure for 2002: 9% gap in attainment at GCSE (5+ A*-Cs) Girls outperforming boys in every subject at GCSE At all stages of education (for all ethnic groups).

ura
Download Presentation

Gender and Educational Attainment in Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gender and Educational Attainment in Schools Stephen Machin and Sandra McNally

  2. Girls doing much better! • Headline figure for 2002: 9% gap in attainment at GCSE (5+ A*-Cs) • Girls outperforming boys in every subject at GCSE • At all stages of education (for all ethnic groups)

  3. Explanations: media • ‘Laddish culture’/ ‘macho’ peer groups / ‘too much football’ • ‘Teachers giving up on boys’ • ‘Extinction’ of male teachers at primary school • Girls mature earlier • Coursework element in exams

  4. Some research questions • At what stage in education is this gap most important? • How is gender gap related to changes at school/exam system or wider social and economic changes, e.g. higher education and labour market participation of women; decline in male teachers; cultural changes • Can policy make a difference? • How does gap in school attainment affect differences in post-compulsory schooling, labour market outcomes?

  5. What is going on? – Data sources • National Key Stage data-sets: children tested at 7, 11, 14 and 16 (GCSE). • General Household Survey: annual survey of 9,000 households from 1972 • Longitudinal data-sets: of all children born in a particular week in March 1958 (National Child Development Study) and April 1970 (British Cohort Study)

  6. Comparing cohort and national data

  7. Gender differences at end of Primary school

  8. Raw gender differential over time: secondary schools

  9. Gender differential in secondary school: added value model

  10. Implications • Gaps appear to have widened out in secondary school years over time. • English: wide gap in favour of girls that persists over time. • Maths: gender gap changes over time (in favour of boys in 70s and 80s, in favour of girls in 90s and 00s)

  11. Economic framework • Education of children viewed as family investment (Becker model..) • Children begin life with ‘inherited’ ability. Parents make investments….influenced by preferences, income and fertility. • Children’s ability and level of parental income and home investment determine schooling attained by children

  12. Higher education of mothers • Effect through income – higher income, more education • Effect on home investment –quantity/quality • Tastes/attitude to education of children Most research suggests that mother’s education is more influential than father’s; and has a bigger influence on girl’s education

  13. Link between income and the gender differential? • Relationship between income and education has changed over time – much stronger now • Has this benefited girls more than boys? – depends on mechanism - At least one study showing that increases in household income lead to greater investment in girls’ schooling (Glick and Sahn, 2000) – but developing country context.

  14. Does parental education and income explain gender gap at age 16? Evidence from the GHS

  15. Research on male/female characteristics with impact on educational attainment • Attributes: Girls: more attentive; longer concentration span; give fewer discipline problems; but less confident than boys • Learning styles: ‘Boys show greater adaptability to more traditional approaches to learning…memorising abstract, unambiguous facts that have to be acquired quickly…willing to sacrifice deep understanding for correct answers achieved at speed’

  16. Coursework vs. exams - Study of GCSE Maths (Stobart, 1992): Boys achieve a small mark advantage in exams, which offset girls’ small advantage in coursework. • Creswell (1990): 1989 GCSE exams in English, Maths and Science. Girls’ marks for coursework higher; Maths and Science: Boys’ marks for exams higher. • Ranking of subjects in terms of coursework (Stobart et al. 1992), Improved performance of girls directly related to the weighting and type of coursework

  17. Coursework vs. exams • Elwood (1995): study of GCSE Maths and English. Gender differential present in courses when coursework element was reduced; gender gap most pronounced for syllabuses not 100% assessed by coursework. • In English, restriction imposed in 1994 from 100% to 40% coursework - performance gap did not reduce.

  18. Influence of method of assessment Multiple choice assessment: The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) – boys doing considerably better than girls in Maths and Science, whereas doing about the same in GCSE (Key, Harris and Fernandes, 1996)

  19. Conclusion • Descriptive analysis shows girls doing better over time, and that the change in gender gaps largely driven by changes at secondary school level. • Shift in gender differential after the introduction of GCSEs – likely to be the most important explanation for growth in the gender gap and suggests policy can matter. • Testing this further? - Most straightforward way would be to compare English students to students of another comparable exam system (Republic of Ireland?) before and after the introduction of GCSEs in England

More Related