1 / 27

Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef

Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef. Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK. T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 at Nextef TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 at KEK Narrow waveguide at KT-1. T18_VG2.4_Disk #2. Disk-damp cell. 2 /27.

ursula
Download Presentation

Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK • T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 at Nextef • TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 at KEK • Narrow waveguide at KT-1

  2. T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 Disk-damp cell 2/27

  3. T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 • T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 was installed and the processing has started in October last year.

  4. Nextef: RF Monitors along waveguide

  5. Nextef: Monitors along beam axis RF • Steady state dark currents were evaluated at the Faraday cups (FC) at upstream and downstream of the beam line. • Downstream dark current can be energy analyzed.

  6. T18 trend 6/27

  7. T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 in 2008 Power trend recorded by control program November 80MV/m (35MW) steady run December 7/27

  8. Power at BD’s and BDR during 27 days at 80MV/m (35MW) level Started at 10:00 on Nov. 28 Finished at 9:00 on Dec. 25 566 hrs run / 643 hrs = 88% ON ~10-5 ~10-6 BDR ~17 str. BD / 566 hr ~0.030 BD/hr/str ~0.75 x10-6 BD/Pulse/m 8/27

  9. Dark current trend during 35MW run FC-UP FC-Mid AM FC-DN 75cm 75cm 195cm 9/27

  10. Dark Current F-N plot 10/27

  11. Typical breakdown rate: on Feb. 17 65MW = 109MV/m run ACC BD ACC BD 2~3 BD? BD? BD? BD? Normal pulse Normal pulse Normal pulse Normal pulse Normal pulse Normal pulse Normal p Normal Need to analyze whether BD or not. Include ACC-BD + all BD?  8 BD / 14hr < 0.6BD/hr ~ 3x10-6/pulse ~ 1.5x10-5/pulse/m • Now on the way to evaluate the breakdown rate carefully. 11/27

  12. Summaryof T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 • Breakdown rates at steady-stare operation of 80 MV/m is approximately 0.75 x10-6 BD/Pulse/m . • We are going to do the high gradient experiments until the end of March. • The total run time will reach up to about 3000 h. • We are trying to estimate the BDR from the dark currant measurements.

  13. TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 Quadrant 13/27

  14. Measurement of TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 • Measurements at CERN for TD18_quad made in CERN give -2.23 dB. • Comparing to this, KEK quad gives 2.56dB measured in transmission mode. About 0.33dB more attenuation due to some reason. • -2.56dB = t=0.295  Q/Q~83% is all attributed to t~1/Q 14/27

  15. The result of the first measurement by Bead pull Input Output reflection amplitude Measurement N5230A F_IF=1kHz, 3pts Freq=11424MHz Tcavity=20.9C Pulse motor step ~ 0.2mm RF Input from input coupler side 15/27

  16. Meas. At 11416MHz, 20.3degC 19 16 1 2 4 3 17 18 20 Average phase advance per cell -118.086 degrees / cell Average phase advance = 118.1 deg/cell dF ~ (1.9/120)*11424*0.0138~ (11416 + 2.6) ~ 11418.6MHz 16/27

  17. Summary of TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 v=c Drive frequency • The frequency of the present quad #5 at operation becomes 11418.6 MHz. • Freq. = 11420.6MHz with120deg/cell at operation should be tuned up by 3.4MHz. • Test tuning has started last week. • We do tuning accurately at the operation frequency after EBW of cooling connection. • High-gradient experiments will start in April. Actual 17/27

  18. Narrow waveguide Parts before bonding 18/27

  19. Narrow Waveguide Design field gradient of 200 MV/m at an RF power of 100 MW group velocity of around 0.3c Rectangular Waveguide: WR90 Wavelength converter: Width 22.86(g 32.15 mm) → 14mm (g 76.59 mm) Cosine taper( 1 g) : Height 10.16 mm → 1 mm Calculated to get a low VSWR by an HFSS. 19/27

  20. CU004 Setup for High-Power processing @ Nextef PPM Klystron @11.424GHz 50 MW, 50 pps, 400ns • Cu002 • tested at XTF (06.11~07.01) • Moving to Nextef (~ 07.04) • Using for system checking (~ 07.05) • SUS003 • Tested at KT-1 (~ 08.10) • Cu004 • Testing at KT-1 (09.01~) • We are on going high power testing of coupper(CU004) at Klystron Test Stand. Narrow waveguide in 5mm lead shield PMT1,2,3,4 Acoustic sensors High power Dummy Load (Load Tree) 20/27

  21. Processing history (Accumulated No. breakdown events vs. power @XTF @Nextef • RF pulse ranged 50ns to 400ns with 50MW at repetition rate of 50pps. • SUS003 had less breakdown events than CU002. • SUS003 attained higher electric field than Cu002. 21/27

  22. Breakdown rate as a function of pulse width of #SUS003 waveguide 104 120 134 [MV/m] 22/27

  23. #CU002 and #SUS003 after high-gradient experiments Observation area • Many breakdown damages were seen on the E-plane surface. • The surface is intensively damaged, and it could also melt due to breakdown. 23/27

  24. #CU002 Surface observation by SEM RF Laser microscope 24/27

  25. #SUS003 Surface observation by SEM RF Laser microscope 25/27

  26. Summary of narrow waveguide • We’re conducting the high-gradient experiments of Cu004 to confirm the previous data of Cu002 and to measure BDR of copper type. - Prototype Cu002 and SUS003 had been tested under different system conditions (at XTF and Nextef). - Number of break down events for SUS003 is less than that for Cu002 which may be a result of different systems . • We’re planning to testother materials. • We’re trying to make a new narrow waveguide; one side is made of copper and the other side is made of stainless-steel. We might know the surface damage of different materials at the same RF power. 26/27

  27. Thank you for your attention ! 27/27

More Related