1 / 17

NATO HQ IMS

NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED. NATO HQ IMS. PfP T RAINING AND E DUCATION E NHANCEMENT P ROGRAMME. TEEP. LtCol Jean d’Andurain (FR AR) C&RS Division ,PSE Branch Oberammergau, Nov 20002. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED. NATO HQ IMS. BACKGROUND. From Washington Summit 1999

urvi
Download Presentation

NATO HQ IMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS PfPTRAINING ANDEDUCATIONENHANCEMENTPROGRAMME TEEP LtCol Jean d’Andurain (FR AR)C&RS Division ,PSE BranchOberammergau, Nov 20002 NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  2. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS BACKGROUND • From Washington Summit 1999 • To Prague Summit 2002 NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  3. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS COMPONENTS • Linkages and Collaborations • Feed back and assessment • Interoperability • Exercises • National Training & Education Strategies • ADL &Simulation NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  4. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS LINKAGES & COLLABORATION • NATO DEFENCE COLLEGE IS NATO POINT OF CONTACT WITH CONSORTIUM DEFENCE ACADEMIES AND SECURITY STUDIES INSTITUTES • ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF PFP TRAINING AND EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ORGANISED ALTERNATIVELY UNDER THE AUSPICES OF NATO SCHOOL (SHAPE), NS(S) CHAIRS, IS REMAINS HIGHER AUTHORITY NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  5. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS ADL&SIM: OUR VISION • A vision limited today to Advanced Distributed Learning and Modeling and Simulation • Still a Vision, but Already discussed with … NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  6. ADL: Where are we now ? • ADL NATO/PfP Prototype Evaluation Study ongoing, Report to be briefed to MC in January 03 • SACLANT with RTA/NMSG already started thinking on Capability package study, NS(S) and NDC already thinking on Academics content management, ADL Workshop due to take place in Oberammergau in November 032 ( This week) • Partners need relevant courses asap, Allies better understand they will benefit of this, we assess it is time to accelerate the pace

  7. Overall management SACLANT JAN 03 Training and Education Management “Board of Directors” JULY 03 Chair (NS)S - Junior Off - NCO Chair NDC - Senior Off NATO OTHER Repository of Courses DEC 03 REQUEST / RESULT NATO NDC / NS(S) PARTNER NATIONS OTHER T&E INST ALLIES PfP TC Short Range Endstate: 2003 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING WEBSITE

  8. M&S:Where are we now ? • Bi-SC, RTA/NMSG and NTG ongoing studies on Simulation Requirements, feasibility study and cost-effective use of CAX and on Partner Requirements; Reports expected in Jan 03. • M&S Workshop due to take place in Oberammergau in November 02. • Requirement identified for a structured, persistent, readily accessible NATO sponsored exercise programme to facilitate NATO/PfP Training using CAX and ADL

  9. NATO (STRAT) (CMX) CJTF & CC CAX Model tbc operational “VIKING” + Allies OPERATIONAL MNB CAX Current model is TYR, tbc HLA COMPLIANCE Individual / ADL NATIONS + Allies BATTALION CAX Current model is TYR, tbc T A C T I C A L NATIONS + NATO/PfP/ADL Trainee: PfP Staff Officer I N D I V I D U A L individual S I M U L A T I O N Endstate: NATO/PFP CJTF Common CAX

  10. CC CJTJ OPERATIONAL TACTICAL CAX/Resp Cell MNB Battalion INDIVIDUAL LIMITED FULL S I M U L A T I O N DESIRED END STATE VIKING 03 ENDSTATE VIKING 05-07???

  11. CONCERNS IDENTIFIRD • On Access to the Internet: Not easy for Caucasus and Central Asia Areas. Recommend to explore co-operation with the IS Scientific and Environmental Affairs Div « Virtual Silk Highway » Project. • On Mentorship Programmes for Partners: Recommend PSE to develop a programme in the MCWG(COOP)+ Framework. • On Resources: Recommend using NATO Framework and Bilateral Assistance, and PSEs + PCC

  12. WAY AHEAD SUMMARY 1/3 • MCM in November: • tasking to NS(S) and NDC • To tell the MC in Jan 03 • What Programme of work they see in the future (populate the site); to indicate resources needed Continue lobbying the Nations and exploring Virtual Silk Highway option

  13. WAY AHEAD SUMMARY 2/3 • Prepare MCWG(COOP)+ and then PMSC after Prague, Nov-December 02: _ • briefing MCWG(COOP) +, MC and then PMSC, indicating Vision is shared by players but resources will be needed, • Flag out Progress on TEEP with specific annexes on ADL and on Sim to Post Prague Implementation Documents

  14. WAY AHEAD SUMMARY 3/3 • PMSC Visit to Viking 03 in Dec 03. • Progress Report in Ministerials • Winter 03, MCM on ADL and M&S, with Timelines, Resources needed and . . . HOPEFULLY. . . Contributions offered

  15. NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED NATO HQ IMS SUMMARY • TEEP DEPENDS ON NATIONAL CONTRIBUTION AND ENGAGEMENT • RESOURCES ARE A KEY FACTOR TO IMPLEMENTATION • FOCUS ON ADL&Sim NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

  16. Questions ?

  17. ORGANIZATION CIVIL GO-NGO-IO UNAMB HA MILITARY UNAMB POLICE MEDIA OBSERVER GROUP BOGALAND OPCON 1 CSS BN 1 MECH BN 2 MECH BN 3 INF BN 4 MECH BN ENGINEER BN MP COY HELO SQN SOF FIELD HOSPITAL PSY OPS CIVIL AFFAIRS ARTY BATT UNAMB MN BDE KASURIA MIDA

More Related