1 / 6

Eric S. Huseby et al, Cell (2005); Nature Immunol. (2007),

Specificity. Eric S. Huseby et al, Cell (2005); Nature Immunol. (2007), compared the T cells of normal mice, with mice genetically engineered to present only one type of peptide in their thymus.

uyen
Download Presentation

Eric S. Huseby et al, Cell (2005); Nature Immunol. (2007),

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Specificity Eric S. Huseby et al, Cell (2005); Nature Immunol. (2007), compared the T cells of normal mice, with mice genetically engineered to present only one type of peptide in their thymus. T cells selected in the thymus are challenged with an antigenic peptide, and reactive T cells identified. Does a reactive T cell remain reactive upon mutating the peptide’s amino acids? If mutations to an amino acid destroy reactivity with at least half the T cells, the amino-acid is labeled a “hot spot”. • Main results: • Single peptide selection: few hot spots – cross-reactive T cells • Many peptide selection: many hot spots – specific T cells

  2. Specificity to antigen peptide: • Single peptide: mutations don’t matter – cross-reactive T-cells • Many peptides: mutations destroy reactivity – specific T-cells

  3. Numerical results for hot-spots† mirror the experimental situation frequency †Hot-spots are defined as locations along the sequence, where mutations of a peptide amino acid destroy reactivity with more than half the reactive T cells

  4. Frustration during negative selection constrains TCR sequences One peptide Ep < E < EN selected

  5. Frustration during negative selection constrains TCR sequences One peptide selected

  6. Frustration during negative selection constrains TCR sequences One peptide selected Many peptides E > EN negatively selected Optimizing interactions with one peptide can lead to “bad” interactions with another – FRUSTRATION. Positive selection does not involve frustration.

More Related