1 / 41

RePEc: a early example of an open library

RePEc: a early example of an open library. Thomas Krichel 2006-12-14. Open libraries and scholarly communication. RePEc is an example for an Open Library. An Open Library is loosely defined an application of the OSS principles to libraries. vague in the making but has some history

vadams
Download Presentation

RePEc: a early example of an open library

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RePEc: a early example of an open library Thomas Krichel 2006-12-14

  2. Open libraries and scholarly communication • RePEc is an example for an Open Library. • An Open Library is loosely defined an application of the OSS principles to libraries. • vague • in the making • but has some history • Looking at RePEc will fix ideas.

  3. scholarly communication • Is mainly about scholars communicating • between themselves • to students, occasionally • Thus it is essentially a community activity. • Traditionally, there have been two intermediaries acting as external agents. • libraries • publishers

  4. when tradition ends • Two external shock • There comes the Internet and reduces distribution costs to zero • There comes computer technology and reduces storage costs somewhat • “opportunity sets” of community members and external agents increases • Proposition: the future depends much on what the community members decide. External agents have little impact.

  5. discipline communities • Scholars of various disciplines have varying habits of research, publication, and evaluation • It is likely that the Internet will emphasize those differences rather than reducing them.

  6. examples: disciplines with established informal publishing • Preprint communities • Physics  arxiv.org • Mathematics  arxiv.org, partially • Working paper communities • Computer Science  CiteSeer (working paper disappearing) • Economics  RePEc

  7. change is tough • Change has to come inside the discipline. • There has to come a pioneering individual who • is technically well versed • is managerially smart • has extraordinary forward thinking • is willing to take considerable risk with her career • Ginsparg, Krichel, Giles & Lawrence are rare

  8. RePEc History • It started with me as a research assistant an in the Economics Department of Loughborough University of Technology in 1990. • a predecessor of the Internet allowed me to download free software without effort • but academic papers had to be gathered in a painful way

  9. CoREJ • published by HMSO • Photocopied lists of contents tables recently published economics journal received at the Department of Trade and Industry • Typed list of the recently received working papers received by the University of Warwick library • The latter was the more interesting.

  10. working papers • early accounts of research findings • published by economics departments • in universities • in research centers • in some government offices • in multinational administrations • disseminated through exchange agreements • important because of 4 year publishing delay

  11. 1991-1992 • I planned to circulate the Warwick working paper list over listserv lists • I argued it would be good for them • increase incentives to contribute • increase revenue for ILL • After many trials, Warwick refused. • During the end of that time, I was offered a lectureship, and decided to get working on my own collection.

  12. 1993: BibEc and WoPEc • Fethy Mili of Université de Montréal had a good collection of papers and gave me his data. • I put his bibliographic data on a gopher and called the service "BibEc" • I also gathered the first ever online electronic working papers on a gopher and called the service "WoPEc".

  13. NetEc consortium • BibEc printed papers • WoPEc electronic papers • CodEc software • WebEc web resource listings • JokEc jokes • HoPEc a lot of Ec!

  14. WoPEc to RePEc • WoPEc was a catalog record collection • WoPEc remained largest web access point • but getting contributions was tough • In 1996 I wrote basic architecture for RePEc. • ReDIF • Guildford Protocol

  15. 1997: RePEcprinciple • Many archives • archives offer metadata about digital objects (mainly working papers) • One database • The data from all archives forms one single logical database despite the fact that it is held on different servers. • Many services • users can access the data through many interfaces. • providers of archives offer their data to all interfaces at the same time. This provides for an optimal distribution.

  16. WoPEc EconWPA DEGREE S-WoPEc NBER CEPR Blackwell US Fed in Print IMF OECD MIT University of Surrey CO PAH Elsevier RePEc is based on 670+ archives

  17. to form a 433k item dataset 191,000 working papers 237,000 journal articles 1,400 software components 2,300 book and chapter listings 11,000 author contact and publication listings 10,000 institutional contact listings

  18. Econpapers Decomate Z39.50 service NEP: New Economics Papers Inomics RePEc author service IDEAS RuPEc EDIRC LogEc CitEc RePEc is used in many services

  19. … describes documents Template-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0 Title: Dynamic Aspect of Growth and Fiscal Policy Author-Name: Thomas Krichel Author-Person: RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel Author-Email: T.Krichel@surrey.ac.uk Author-Name: Paul Levine Author-Email: P.Levine@surrey.ac.uk Author-WorkPlace-Name: University of Surrey Classification-JEL: C61; E21; E23; E62; O41 File-URL: ftp://www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/ pub/RePEc/sur/surrec/surrec9601.pdf File-Format: application/pdf Creation-Date: 199603 Revision-Date: 199711 Handle: RePEc:sur:surrec:9601

  20. … describes persons (RAS) template-type: ReDIF-Person 1.0 name-full: MANKIW, N. GREGORY name-last: MANKIW name-first: N. GREGORY handle: RePEc:per:1984-06-16:N__GREGORY_MANKIW email: ngmankiw@harvard.edu homepage:http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/ mankiw/mankiw.html workplace-institution: RePEc:edi:deharus workplace-institution: RePEc:edi:nberrus Author-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:76:y:1986:i:4:p:676-91 Author-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:77:y:1987:i:3:p:358-74 Author-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:78:y:1988:i:2:p:173-77 ….

  21. … describes institutions Template-Type: ReDIF-Institution 1.0 Primary-Name: University of Surrey Primary-Location: Guildford Secondary-Name: Department of Economics Secondary-Phone: (01483) 259380 Secondary-Email: economics@surrey.ac.uk Secondary-Fax: (01483) 259548 Secondary-Postal: Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH Secondary-Homepage: http://www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/ Handle: RePEc:edi:desuruk

  22. what do open libraries do? • Identify records • Relate identified records • These actions require human control. • They prepare for assessment of performance.

  23. key to success • Have a small group of volunteers • Disseminate as widely as possible • Demonstrate to authors and institutions that it works for them. • institutional registration • author registration

  24. institutional registration • It started by one sad geezer making a list of departments that have a web site. • I persuaded him that his data would be more widely used if integrated into the RePEc database. • Now he is a happy geezer and one of our three crucial volunteers.

  25. RePEc author service • RePEc document data has author names as strings. • The authors register with RAS to list contact details and identify the papers they wrote. • This is classic access control, but done by the authors.

  26. author registration • It started when funding allowed us to hire a crazy programmer to write an author registration system. • The system went online as "HoPEc" in late 2000. • It has been renamed "RePEc author service" (RAS) • A recent grant from OSI allows for a rewrite and expansion.

  27. LogEc • It is a service by Sune Karlsson that tracks usage of items in the RePEc database • abstract views • downloads • There is mail that is sent by Christian Zimmermann to • archive maintainers • RAS registrants that contains a monthly usage summary.

  28. authors' incentives • Authors perceive the registration as a way to achieve common advertising for their papers. • Author records are used to aggregate usage logs across RePEc user services for all papers of an author. • Stimulates a "I am bigger than you are" mentality. Size matters!

  29. recently • In 2004, Peter Jasco compared RePEc services with the EconLit proprietary professional database. • IDEAS and LogEc were Peter’s pick • EconLit was Peter’s pan. • He slammed the working paper coverage of EconLit. • He could have slammed other things.

  30. RePEc / EconLit partnership • RePEc now delivers all its working paper data to EconLit, without getting the journal data of EconLit in return. • This may seem absolutely perverse! A bunch of volunteers laboring for a multi-million $$$ concern! • In fact it serves RePEc well because it adds officialdom.

  31. partnership with library officialdom • Recently, the Zentralbibliothek fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften (ZBW) have become interested in working with RePEc. • The aim is to build a new dataset called LoTEc for the moment. • LoT means Long Term, but could also mean “a lot”.

  32. automated full-text collection • The idea behind LoTEc is to build a system that collects full-text from metadata. • take title and author data • search Google for it • examine search results if the could be the full text • http://openlib.org/home/krichel/proposals/khabarovsk.pdf is a funding application with more ideas about such systems.

  33. konz project • The konz project software is a prototype for LoTEc • uses DBLP • title searches only • limited to PDF / MS office full-text • Results of konz are thin. only 5% of full-text found. Probably the fault of bad programming (by myself).

  34. will LoTEc do better? • Recent work on a small sample of 460 papers by Bergstrom finds a self-archiving ratio of about 80% for top-level recent research papers. • There are chances that we will find these if we can improve over the konz software. • Initial tests to be done on the current version of konz in early 2007.

  35. what’s good a paper in an archive? • Unless we have the author’s permission, we can not make a paper available in archived form (on our server). All we could do is make metadata available. • To gather permissions from the authors the plan is to use the RePEc author service in stage four of the ACIS project.

  36. validation / permissions interface • For a paper that an author has written, RAS would present a set of potential full-text files and ask • is this a full-text of this paper? • can we make an archived copy of this paper available for public use? • This interface is supposed to be set up during 2007.

  37. KEY idea 1 • RePEc attracts a community of users and contributors • The community itself is the focus of attention • RePEc describes the living rather than the dead. • Forget about documents!

  38. KEY idea 2 • Forget about users! • Disseminate widely • Users will come through Google anyway. • And Google loves RePEc services • puts RePEc services top when the query consists of the name of an author

  39. obstacles to open libraries • lack of imagination & entrepreneurship • inability to form alliances • user-centered thinking • document-centered thinking • technical competence required • OAI PMH • XML and XML Schema • Unicode • the "C" word

  40. http://openlib.org/home/krichel Thank you for your attention!

More Related