581 likes | 1.04k Views
Which leadership model will help you fulfill the mission and vision of the organization ?. Organizational Models. . . . Industrial/ProfessionalInformationalBureaucratic. Source: Dennis Gillen, S.U. Whitman School of Management. . . . . Industrial. Professional. Informational. Socio-Economic E
E N D
1. Organizational Leadership: Trends, Theory, and Practices
2. Which leadership model will help you fulfill the mission and vision of the organization ?
5.
“. . . even eBay are all based on social contracts whose dominant feature is that authority comes form the bottom up, and people can and do feel self empowered to improve their lot. People living in such contexts tend to spend their time focusing on what to do next, not on whom to blame next.” (p. 562)
The New Middlers: Great collaborators, orchestrators ,synthesizers, explainers, leveragers, adapters
Global collaboration
“ Thinking more seriously about how we stimulate positive imaginations is of the utmost importance.. .peaceful imaginations that seek to minimize alienation and celebrate interdependence rather than self-sufficiency, inclusion rather than exclusion, openness, opportunity, and hope rather than limits suspicion, and grievance” (p. 545)
eBay created a self-governing community
Openess and exposure breeds trust and tolerance
6. Collaborative Management/Leadership Collaborative management is a concept that describes the process of facilitating and operating in multi-organizational arrangements to solve problems that cannot be solved, or solved easily, by single organizations. Where traditional administration relied primarily on organization structure to shape administrative action, collaborative management is more fluid, thus requiring managers to shift from structure to process for leverage. Thus, the needed skill set of managers has changed to one that heavily emphasizes negotiation, facilitation, mediation, and collaborative problem solving." (Rosemary O’Leary)
7. Bureaucracy . . . “The concentration of authority in a complex structure of administrative bureaus”“the administration of government through departments and subdivisions managed by sets of appointed officials following an inflexible routine”“government officialism or inflexible routine. (See red tape.)” Webster’s New World Dictionary, 1994
8. Bureaucracy What is the “history” of your bureaucracy?
What does it do well? What are its problems?
Are you in a reform stage? What are the goals of the reform?
9. The American Dream“The core of the problem addressed by this bureaucratic paradigm is democratic accountability. The solution, devised as an alternative to partisan patronage and ad hoc meddling, is that execution of the laws be organized as a ministerial activity. The laws should be crystal clear; their execution should be thoroughly routine. The aims of managerial reform, quite simply, should be honesty, efficiency, and a day’s work for a day’s pay. The demons are corruption, arbitrariness, and sloth. There is no room in this paradigm for bureaucratic intelligence or creativity . . .” Alan Altshuler in Barzelay, 1992, p, viii
10. Do we need government? (It depends) Rousseau
-Humans are rational actors who need liberty and resources
-Liberty Hobbes
-Humans are “brutish animals”
-Regulation
11. Choice: Limited Government Create an environment where people can be successful on their own
Defense
Economic regulation for strong commerce
Land acquisition
Immigration
12. Who are the administrators? 1789-1830 Elites
1830-1900 Political appointees controlled by the parties
13. Catalyst for Change Corruption of the political parties, urbanization, immigration
Progressive movement (1880’s-1930’s)
Electoral reform
Anti-corruption
Government services: public education, regulation of food
Professional, non-political administrators
14. The Weberian Dream: the Bureaucracy-Technical superiority- Efficiency- Clarity of roles, task, rules, and purpose- Trained, qualified officials- Ability to work together without conflict- Equity for allRainey, 1996, p. 32
15. The Profession of Public Administration Woodrow Wilson: The Study of Administration
Frederick Taylor: Scientific Management
Politics –Administration Dichotomy
Efficiency as defined by a business model
16. Bureaucratic Paradigm Economy and Efficiency
Competence and Professionalism
Impersonal Administration (neutrality)
Rational Planning
Unity of Command
Control
Michael Barzelay, 1992
17. Conflicts in the Bureaucratic Paradigm Politics vs Administration
Administrative vs Technical Expertise
Rules vs Discretion
Planning vs Execution
Staff vs Line
Headquarters vs Field
Centralization vs Decentralization
Michael Barzelay, 1992
18. Accountability Problems Weak
Misguided
Misplaced
Michael Barzelay, 1992
19. Reinventing GovernmentGovernment is the means by which we make collective decisions; provide service that benefits all; solve collective problems.People who work in government are not the problem; the systems in which they work are the problem.Osborne and Gaebler, 1991
20. A New Kind of Government Catalytic- Steering rather than rowing
Community-Owned- Empowering rather than serving
Competitive- Injecting competition into service delivery
Mission-Driven- Transforming rule-driven organizations
Results-Oriented- Funding Outcomes, not inputs
Customer-Driven- Meeting customer needs, not the bureaucracy
Anticipatory- Prevention rather than cure
Decentralized- From hierarchy to participation
Osborne and Gabler
21. The New Public Management: Running a Business? National Partnership for Reinventing Government (US)
Next Steps (UK)
Circulaire Rocard (France)
Etc.
22. Public Sector Modernisation: Open Government?“Citizens can know things, get things, create things” Transparency and Accountability
Fairness and Equity
Efficiency and Effectiveness
Respect for the rule of law
High Standards of ethical behavior
OECD Policy Brief, “Public Sector Modernisation: Open Government,” February 2005
23. The New Public Administration Public Administration Tradition: Neutral service
Public Affairs Tradition: Interactive leadership (statesmanship)
Policy Analysis Tradition: Analysis and objectivity
The New Public Administration: ?
25. Leadership in the Public Sector: What is it? Why did you join the public sector?
What keeps you going?
26. Leadership in the Public Sector: What is it? Values Neutral
A Higher Calling
Running a Business
27. The Neutral Bureaucrat Implements not Decides (Wilsonian Dichotomy)
POSDCORB
28. The Activist Leadership
Street Level Bureaucracy (Lipsky)
Reinventing Government (Osborne and Gabler)
29. The Business Leader Reinventing and reengineering
Measuring costs and performance
Contracting for most efficient service
30. How is leadership thinking evolving?
31. Leadership “By leadership, most people mean the capacity of someone to direct and energize the willingness of people in social units to take action and achieve goals.”
Hal Rainey, 1996, p.260
32. Leadership Followers
Influence
Direction/Common Goal
33. Characteristics of Admired Leaders(Kouzes and Posner, The Leadership Challenge)
34. Cross-national Characteristics of Admired Leaders(Kouzes and Posner, The Leadership Challenge)
35. Open Government“Citizens can know things, get things, create things” OECD Policy Brief, Public Sector Modernisation: Open Government, February 2005
36. Leadership Traits vs
Motivation
Integrity
Confidence
Cognitive Ability
Task Knowledge
Kirkpatrick and Locke Behaviors
Transfomation (Burns)
Competing Values (Quinn)
Frames (Bolman and Deal)
Styles: Production vs People (Blake and Mouton)
37. Leadership Styles vs
Style is fixed, change context
Behaviors
Change behaviors to meet contextual demands
38. Leadership vs Management “Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing.”
Bennis and Nanus, 1985, p.21.
39. Leadership vs Management (Kotter)
Leadership
Developing Vision and Strategies
Aligning People
Motivating and Inspiring Performance
Dramatic Useful Change
40. Leadership Model: Scientific Management (Structural Model) “The decisive reason for the advance of the bureaucratic organization has always been its purely technical superiority over any form of organization.
Precision, speed, unambiguity. . . reduction of friction and of material and personnel costs - these are raised to the optimum point in the strictly bureaucratic administration.” Max Weber
41. Leadership: Weber’s Rational Organization Labor and responsibilities are divided and specified
Positions are organized in a hierarchy of authority
Employees are objectively selected and promoted for technical abilities
Administrative decisions are recorded and kept
Career managers work for salaries
Standard rules and regulations for all
42. Leadership Model: Scientific Principles “Science, not rule of thumb.
Harmony, not discord.
Cooperation, not individualism.
Maximum output, not restricted input.
Development of each man to his greatest efficiency and prosperity.”
Frederick Taylor, 1911 in Weisbord, 1987, p. 63.
43. Leadership: Breakthroughs in Scientific Management Financial Controls
Jobs as Tasks
Time and Motion Studies
Pay for Performance
Wage Incentives
Group Supervision
Labor-Management Cooperation
Training
44. Leadership: The Rational Leader POSDCORB
planning
organizing
staffing
directing
coordinating
reporting
budgeting Luther Gulick,1937 in Rainey, 1996, p. 33
45. Scientific/ Rational Management
46. Scientific/Rational Management
47. Human Resource Model
48. Human Resource Model
49. Leadership: Human Resource Model Leaders need to create a “fit” between the needs of the people and the needs of the organization.
50. Leadership: Human Resource Model Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1954)
Physiological. . .Safety. . .Belonging. . . Esteem . . . Self-Actualization
Herzberg’s Two-Level Hierarchy (1966)
Motivators address job satisfaction, self-actualization needs vs hygiene needs
51. Leadership: Human Resource Model McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y (1960)
Theory X managers believe: Employees are passive, lazy, prefer to be led, resist change.
Theory X managers manage:
52. Leadership: Human Resource Model Theory Y managers believe: People are not passive by nature, but as a result of their experience in organizations.
Theory Y mangers manage: By relying on the self-control and self-direction of employees; by arranging things so that the interests of the employees and the organization coincide.
53. Leadership: Human Resource Model Ouchi’s Theory Z (1981)
“All of the American employees say,"This is the best place I’ve ever worked. They know what they doing here, care about quality and make me feel like part of one big family.”
54. Leadership: Human Resource Model Transformational vs Transactional Leadership:
Leaders should raise followers to a higher plane, transcending self-interest.
55. Leadership: Human Resource Model Burns (1978) : Move from exchanging rewards for performance to transforming goals.
Bennis and Nanus (1985): Leaders lead by managing themselves, doing the right things, empowering others.
Bass (1985): Leaders engage in both transactional and transformational leadership.
56. Leadership: Human Resource Model Leadership Practices
- Job enrichment vs enlargement
- Participative management
- Training and organizational development
- Total quality management
- Reinvention/reengineering
57. 1990’sLeadership Roles
58. 1980’s Human Resource Model
59. Political Model
60. Leadership: Political Model Organizations are competing coalitions. The job of the leader is to gain power and control scarce resources.
The skills of leadership are agenda setting, networking, forming coalitions, and negotiating. (Kanter, 1983)
Leaders need to acquire and use power through positive politics. (Burns, 1978; Block, 1986)
61. Leadership: Symbolic Model Organization structure, size, complexity, and administrative systems are symbols, reflecting legal and social expectations. Organizations are judged not as much by actions as by appearance.
62. Leadership: Symbolic Model Organizations as cultures (Arnold, 1938; Schein 1985)
Myths as creators of meaning and performance (Clark, 1972)
Plans and processes as symbols of good management; garbage can theory of meetings (March, 1974)
63. Symbolic Management
64. Open Systems/Learning Organizations
65. Leadership: Open Systems Model Systems Approach (Katz and Kahn, 1966)
An organization is a system with interdependent social and technical subsystems, which seek to maintain equilibrium and therefore adapt to environmental disturbances
66. Leadership: Open Systems Model Contingency Approach (Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967)
Organizational size and processes are shaped by contingencies of technology, size, environment, and strategic choice.
67. Leadership: Open Systems Model Learning Organization (Senge, 1990)
Organizations will survive and thrive on the basis of the continual learning of their members. Learning is accomplished through five disciplines: 1) systems thinking, 2) personal mastery, 3) shedding mental models, 4) building shared vision, and 5) team learning and dialogue.
68. Open Systems: Adaptive Leadership Adaptive vs Technical Leadership (Heifetz and Laurie, 1997)
shifting approach to leadership functions (direction, protection, role orientation, controlling conflict, norm maintenance) from technical to adaptive
69. 1970’s- 1990’sOpen Systems/Learning Organizations
70. Open Systems: Adaptive Leadership Six Principles
1. “Get on the balcony” to see patterns
2. Identify challenges and ask key questions
3. Let the organization feel pressure
4. Challenge current roles without defining new ones
5. Expose conflict or let it emerge
6. Challenge unproductive norms
Heifitz and Laurie, 1997
71. Leadership: Open Systems Model Self-Organizing Systems (Wheatley, 1992)
Organizations are fluid, self-organizing systems that use relationships, information, and self-reference to maintain stability.
72. Leadership: New Scientific Management Organizations are self-renewing interdependent systems
Information is the driver and must be everywhere
Participation, communication, and teams are the keys to learning
Shared vision provides meaning and stability
Redefine processes
73. 1990’s Organizations and Management
74. Uncertainty calls for Situational Leadership Managerial Grid (Blake and Mouton, 1969) Concern for Task vs Concern for People
Situational Leadership (Hersey and Blanchard, 1977)
Balance of Task vs Relationship (telling, selling, participating, delegating)
75. Situational Leadership Four Frames (Bolman and Deal, 1991) Operating in all four frames (human resource, structural, symbolic, political)
Competing Values Competency Framework (Quinn,1983)
Mastering competing roles and competencies
76. Leadership: Four Frames Model “ The truly effective manger and leader will need multiple tools, the skills to use each of them, and the wisdom to match frames and situations.” Bolman and Deal
Human Resource Structural
Political Symbolic
77. Leadership: Competing Values Framework (Adapted from Quinn)
78. Leadership: Competing Values Framework Innovator
80. Leadership: Competing Values Framework
81. Leadership: Competing Values Framework
82. Leadership: Competing Values Framework Understanding self and others
Communicating effectively
Developing employees
83. Leadership: Competing Values Framework
85. Leadership: Competing Values Framework (2011)
87. Leadership Personal Organizational Challenging the Process
1. Search for opportunities
2. Experiment and take risks
Inspiring a Shared Vision
3. Envision the future
4. Enlist others Setting the Course
1. Build consensus on the vision
2. Define values
3. Set organizational goals
Fueling Improvement
4. Create partnerships
5. Put enablers in place:
-training & development
-rewards & recognition
-employee communication
- resource allocation
88. Leadership Personal Organizational Enabling Others to Act
5. Foster Collaboration
6. Strengthen others
Modeling the Way
7. Set the example
8. Plan the small wins
Encouraging the Heart
9. Recognize individual contribution
10. Celebrate accomplishments
*Kouzes and Posner, The Leadership
Challenge - employee involvement
- info & measurement
6. Create the right organizational structure
7. Give and seek feedback on progress
Ensuring Success
8. Know performance results
9. Celebrate accomplishments
10. Communicate areas for improvement
89. Leadership for Change Present State
Vision of
Transition Desired State
90. Total Quality Management New concepts: customer (internal and external), process, value added, supplier to output chain, empowerment, systems
Dilemma: balancing public policy with customer needs
91. What will help her ?
What can hinder her ?
92. You are Elizabeth Best. What should you do from the perspective of :
the symbolic frame
the political frame
the human resource frame
the structural frame ?
(Discuss for 10 minutes and come back!)
93. 2nd day mapped out a strategy
For 3 weeks, visit agencies and take notes on what could be done
Wore a different dress each day
Talked to managers- and clerks and secretaries, then sat with directors
Made appointment to meet with Secretary and went through list (most important last)
94. Budget!!
Sold top advisor
Collected data, did staff work (jobs, other states, etc.)
Collected proposals
Sold $4 M increase to old buddy in charge of budgets ($2 M brings 6M revenues)
Redid budget, making up titles
Got budget
95. Leadership: Four Frames Model “ The truly effective manger and leader will need multiple tools, the skills to use each of them, and the wisdom to match frames and situations.” Bolman and Deal
Human Resource Structural
Political Symbolic
96. 5/13/03 Structural FrameOrganization as Factory/Machine Goals
Specialized roles
Formal relationships
Focus is on
Data
Logic
Structure
Plans
Policies
Draws from sociology and management science.Draws from sociology and management science.
97. 5/13/03 Human Resource Frame Goal
Align organizational and human needs
Keep people involved and communication open
Strategic Planning
Gatherings to promote participation Decision Making
Open process to produce commitment
Communication
Exchange information, needs, and feelings
Leader
Servant
Catalyst
98. 5/13/03 Political FrameOrganization as Jungle Power
Conflict
Competition
Organizational politics
Focus is on
Build a power base
Get access
Influence key players
99. 5/13/03 Symbolic FrameOrganization as Theater/Temple Culture
Meaning
Metaphor
Ritual
Ceremony
Stories
Heroes
Focus is on
Meaning
Belief
Faith
100. Leadership: Competing Values Framework (Adapted from Quinn)
102. Recognize mutual dependence (need for information and resources)
Seek information and help to do the job
Understand boss’s goals, pressures, style
Understand yourself and how you react to the boss
Accept your independence
Adjust to develop compatible styles
Trust!
John Kotter