1 / 12

Cost optimal facade design solutions of office buildings Tallinn 10.10.2013

Cost optimal facade design solutions of office buildings Tallinn 10.10.2013. Martin Thalfeldt PhD student in TUT www.nzeb.ee. Objectives. Developing energy and cost efficient facade design principles for nearly zero energy building ( non-residential ) Studies so far : window U>1.0

valora
Download Presentation

Cost optimal facade design solutions of office buildings Tallinn 10.10.2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CostoptimalfacadedesignsolutionsofofficebuildingsTallinn 10.10.2013 Martin Thalfeldt PhDstudentin TUT www.nzeb.ee

  2. Objectives • Developingenergy and costefficientfacadedesignprinciplesfornearlyzeroenergybuilding (non-residential) • Studies so far: window U>1.0 • Questions: optimalsizeofwindows, highly transparent orsolarprotectionglazing, externalshadingornot, insulationthickness, facade vs PV • Influenced: daylight, heating, cooling, electriclighting, investment • Studyprocedures: • Energy and indoorsimulations + financialcalculationsof a genericoffice floor model • Number of windowpanesupto 5, U=0.21 • Financialfeasability-> min. 20 year NPV • Bestpossibleenergyefficiency

  3. Methods • Criteriaformostfinanciallyfeasiblecaseisminimum net present value, whichincludesinvestmentcost and 20 yearenergyuse. • CalculationsaccordingtoEstonianenergyefficiencyrequirements Smallestenergyconsumption ≠ min €

  4. Step 1 Minimumwindowsize • Averagedaylightfactor≥ 2% • Minimumsizedwindows

  5. Step 1 Minimumwindowsize

  6. Step 2 Highly transparent orsolarprotectionglazing? Deliveredenergy Primaryenergy Highly transparent glazingallowsreachingbetterenergyefficiency!

  7. Step3 Number ofpanes and insulationthicknessinbalance! • 3 pane glazing – insulation 200 mm (U=0,16) • 4 pane glazing – insulation 250 mm (U=0,13) • 5 pane glazing – insulation 390 mm (U=0,09)

  8. Step 4 Energyefficientfacadesolutions

  9. Mostenergyefficientfacadesolution Office floor primary energy=85.5 x 1.2 = 102.6 kWh/m2 Financiallymostfeasiblesolution Office floor primary energy=93.6 x 1.2 = 112.6 kWh/m2

  10. Coolingcapacities • Windowsizeaffectscoolingcapacitiesinadditiontoenergyconsumption • Tripleglazingwith WWR ca 25% mightbe a moresensiblesolution

  11. FromlowenergytonZEB 3 panes, WWR 37.5% (Costoptimal) 4 panes, WWR 37.5% (North 60%) 5 panes, WWR 29.5% 5 panes, WWR 60% (Energyefficient)

  12. Conclusion • Space heating dominatesincaseofdouble and triplewindows, theproportionof heating reducesas no ofpanesincreases • Smallerwindowsresultinbetterenergyefficiencyincaseofdouble and tripleglazing • Financiallymostfeasiblecaseistripleglazingwithhighthermalresistance (U=0.54 g=0.49), windowtowallratio ca 25%, insulationthickness 200 mm (U=0.16) • Bestenergyefficiencywasachievedwithquintupleglazing (U=0.21 g=0.24), windowtowallratio 60%, insulationthickness 390 mm (U=0.09) • Incaseofquadrupleglazing (U=0.32 g=0.36) theoptimalwindowtowallratiois ca 40% • Externalshadingisnotnecessaryifwindows are sizedaccordingtoaveragedaylightfactor 2% • Itismorereasonabletousecostoptimalfacadesolution and install more PV panels • Necessitytostudytheinfluenceofexternalshadingcontrolstrategies and doublefacade on energyefficiencyoccurred

More Related