1 / 38

T.Barnes tbarnes@utk ORNL / U.Tenn. Charm2006 Beijing 7 June 2006

T.Barnes tbarnes@utk.edu ORNL / U.Tenn. Charm2006 Beijing 7 June 2006. The XYZs of c c :. 1. Charmonium reminder. 2. The new states: X(3943) Y(3943) Z(3931) Y(4260) c c ? c c hybrids!? How to test these possibilities. (My) theor. numbers are from

vanya
Download Presentation

T.Barnes tbarnes@utk ORNL / U.Tenn. Charm2006 Beijing 7 June 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T.Barnes tbarnes@utk.edu ORNL / U.Tenn. Charm2006 Beijing 7 June 2006 The XYZs of cc: 1. Charmonium reminder. 2. The new states: X(3943) Y(3943) Z(3931) Y(4260) cc? cc hybrids!? How to test these possibilities. (My) theor. numbers are from T.Barnes, S.Godfrey and E.S.Swanson, PRD72, 054026 (2005). For BABAR, BELLE, BES, CLEO, GSI, … : All 40 cc states expected to 4.42 GeV, all 139 of their open-charm strong modes and partial widths, all 231 open-charm strong decay amplitudes, all 153 E1 and (some) M1 EM widths.

  2. Charmonium (cc) A nice example of a QQ spectrum. Expt. states are shown with the usual L classification. Above 3.73 GeV: Open charm strong decays (DD, DD* …): broader states except 1D2 2- +, 2- - 3.73 GeV Below 3.73 GeV: Annihilation and EM decays. (rp, KK* , gcc, gg, l+l-..): narrow states.

  3. Contact S*S from OGE; Implies S=0 and S=1 c.o.g. degenerate for L > 0. (Not true for vector confinement.) Minimal quark potential model physics: OGE + linear scalar confinement; Schrödinger eqn (often relativized) for wfns. Spin-dep. forces, O(v2/c2), treated perturbatively. Here…

  4. Fitted and predicted cc spectrum Coulomb (OGE) + linear scalar conft. potential model black = expt, red = theory. Y(4260) JPC = 1- - Z(3931), X(3943), Y(3943) C = (+) states fitted S*S OGE

  5. A LGT cc-sector spectrum e.g.: X.Liao and T.Manke, hep-lat/0210030 (quenched – no decay loops) Broadly consistent with the cc potential model. No LGT cc radiative or strong decay predictions yet. cc and cc–H from LGT <-1- + exotic cc-H at 4.4 GeV n.b. The flux-tube model of hybrids has a lightest multiplet with 8 JPCs; 3 exotics and 5 nonexotics, roughly degenerate: (0,1,2) +- /-+, 1++,,1- -. Y(4260)? Small L=2 hfs.

  6. The main theme: Comparing expt. with theory, especially for 2P cc states, through: 1st Strong decays 2nd EM (g and gg transitions)

  7. Trivial observations for 2P cc open-charm strong decays: Thresholds DD 3.73 GeV DD* 3.87 GeV (Ds Ds 3.94 GeV - small) JPC-allowed D, D* modes (M < D*D*) c2’ 2++ 23P2 DD, DD* c1’ 1++ 23P1 DD* c0’ 0++ 23P0 DD hc’ 1+ - 21P1 DD*but C= ( -) Looking for both DD and DD* is a good filter! n.b. JP = 1+DD* final states have both S and D amps. Detailed 2P cc predictions…

  8. Open-charm strong decays: 3P0 decay model (Orsay group, 1970s) qq pair production with vacuum quantum numbers. LI = g y y . A standard for light hadron decays. It works for D/S in b1-> wp. The relation to QCD is obscure.

  9. One success of strong decay models An historical SLAC puzzle explained: the weakness of y(4040) -> DD e.g. D*D* molecule? After restoring this “p3 phase space factor”, the BFs are: D0D0 : D0D*0 : D*0D*0 0.12 +/- 0.06 0.95 +/- 0.19 [1] +/- 0.31

  10. Y(4040) Y(4040) partial widths [MeV] (3P0 decay model): DD = 0.1 DD* = 32.9 D*D*= 33.4 [multiamp. mode] DsDs= 7.8 Y(4040) ->D*D* amplitudes (3P0 decay model): 1P1 = +0.034 5P1 = -0.151 = - 2 * 51/2 *1P1 5F1 = 0 famous nodal suppression of a 33S1Y(4040) cc-> DD std. cc and D meson SHO wfn. length scale

  11. Expt. preview, M, G and modes,X(3943),Y(3943), Z(3931): J/y

  12. 2P cc Strong Widths: 3P0 Decay Model 23P2 80 [MeV] 23P1 165 [MeV] 23P030 [MeV] 21P1 87 [MeV] 2P DD DD* DsDs (assuming NR cc potential model masses)

  13. An interesting new charmonium production mechanism! Allows access to C=(+) cc states in e+e- w/o using gg. X(3943) X(3943) hc’ hc c0 No c1or c2 !? n.b. Eichten: X(3943) may be the 31S0 cchc’’. [ref] = P.Pakhlov et al. (Belle), hep-ex/0507019, 8 Jul 2005.

  14. Strong Widths: 3P0 Decay Model 3S 33S1 74 [MeV] 31S080 [MeV] DD DD* D*D* DsDs X(3943) Maybe not 2P? X(3943) = 31S0hc” ? (Eichten) 52(10) MeV X(3872) Is the narrow expt width a problem for X(3943) =31S0hc”? Let’s recalculate with M = 3943 MeV and see …

  15. Yes the total width is a problem for X(3943) = 31S0 hc”. Gthy = 70 MeV vs Gexpt = 15(10) MeV X(3943) 2 thy. expt.

  16. Y(3943) B-> KY(3943), Y->wJ/y [ref] = S.-K. Choi et al. (Belle), PRL94, 182002 (2005).

  17. Y(3943) Y(3943) = 23P1 cc?(Too light for cc-H.) Gtot Expt for Y(3943): B -> KY(3943), Y->wJ/y G= 87 +/- 22 MeV 1++ cc ->wJ/yis unusual; cc-> virtual DD* e.g. ->wJ/y ? n.b.c1IS seen in B decays theory expt. Theory for 23P1(3943): G= 135 MeV A strong DD* mode $? The only open-charm mode?

  18. Z(3931) gg->Z(3931)-> DD [ JPC(gg) .ne. 1++] [ref] = S.Uehara et al. (Belle), hep-ex/0507033, 8 Jul 2005.

  19. Z(3931) Z(3931) = 23P2 cc ? (suggested by Belle) Expt for Z(3931): gg -> Z(3931) -> DD G = 20 +/- 8 +/- 3 MeV Ggg* BDD = 0.23 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.04 keV Theory for 23P2(3931): G= 47 MeV DD*/DD = 0.35 Ggg* BDD = 0.47 keV (Ggg from T.Barnes, IXth Intl. Conf. on gg Collisions, La Jolla, 1992.) The crucial test of Z(3931) = 23P2 cc : DD* mode $? Gtot thy expt Gggin http://web.utk.edu/~tbarnes/website/Barnes_twophot.pdf

  20. EM transitions (How one might make 2P cc states.) What radiative partial widths do we expect from various initial 1- - cc states to 2P cc states?

  21. E1 Radiative Partial Widths 3S -> 2P 33S1->23P214 [keV] 33S1->23P139 [keV] 33S1->23P054 [keV] 31S0->21P1105 [keV] 3S -> 1P 33S1->3P2 0.7 [keV] 33S1->3P1 0.5 [keV] 33S1->3P0 0.3 [keV] 31S0->1P19.1[keV] blue = known states red = unknown

  22. E1 Radiative Partial Widths 23D3 -> 23P2239 [keV] 23D2->23P2 52 [keV] 23P1298 [keV] 23D1->23P2 6 [keV] 23P1168 [keV] 23P0483 [keV] 21D2->21P1 336 [keV] 2D -> 2P 2D -> 1F 23D3 -> 3F4 66 [keV] -> 3F3 5 [keV] -> 3F2 14 [keV] 23D2-> 3F3 44 [keV] 3F2 6 [keV] 23D1->3F251 [keV] 21D2->1F3 54 [keV] 23D3 -> 3P2 29 [keV] 23D2-> 3P2 7 [keV] 3P1 26 [keV] 23D1->3P2 1 [keV] 3P1 14 [keV] 3P0 27 [keV] 21D2->1P1 40 [keV] 2D -> 1P

  23. y(3770) Ref: R.A.Briere et al. (CLEO), hep-ex/0605070 (May 2006). y(3770) -> g ccJ y(3770) -> g cc2 is very sensitive to the 23S1<->3D1 mixing angle q. With q approx -15o, both the e+e- and strong 3770 widths = theor predictions. This q is very interesting: what drives 23S1<->3D1 mixing?

  24. y(3770) Ref: R.A.Briere et al. (CLEO), hep-ex/0605070 (May 2006). Experiment and theory [assuming y(3770) = pure 3D1 cc ].

  25. y(3770) -> g ccJ n.b. ratios of versus J are the most reliable theor predictions. y(3770) Ref: Y.-B.Ding, D.-H.Qin and K.-T.Chao, PRD44, 3562 (1991). new CLEO rad widths: 172 (30) 70 (17) < 21

  26. Y(4260)

  27. Y(4260) e+e- -> Y(4260)ISR, Y -> p+p-J/y [ref] = BaBar, PRL95, 142001 (2005). Not seen in R. Hmmm?! log scale

  28. Y(4260) CLEO: Evidence for Y(4260) in J/y p+ p-andJ/yp0p0 channels [pb] J/y p+ p- 58 +/- 4 J/yp0p023 +/- 1 (approx. 2:1 ratio expected for I=0) J/y K+ K- 9 +/- 1 +12 -10 +12 - 8 + 9 - 5 Ref: T.E.Coan et al. (CLEO), PRL96, 162003 (2006); hep-ex/0602034v2.

  29. cc spectrum, potential models (dashed: nonrel L, Godfrey-Isgur R) vs data Possible 1- - state Y(4260). Note no plausible cc assignment exists. A1- - charmonium hybrid??

  30. A LGT cc-sector spectrum e.g.: X.Liao and T.Manke, hep-lat/0210030 (quenched – no decay loops) Broadly consistent with the cc potential model. No LGT cc radiative or strong decay predictions yet. cc and cc–H from LGT <-1- + exotic cc-H at 4.4 GeV n.b. The flux-tube model of hybrids has a lightest multiplet with 8 JPCs; 3 exotics and 5 nonexotics, roughly degenerate: (0,1,2) +- /-+, 1++,,1- -. Y(4260)? Small L=2 hfs.

  31. Characteristics of cc-hybrids. (folklore, mainly abstracted from models, some LGT) States (flux-tube model): The lightest hybrid multiplet should be a roughly degenerate set containing 3 exoticand 5 nonexotic JPC; 0+-, 1-+, 2+-, 0-+,1+-,2-+, 1++,1-- Mass ca. 4.0 – 4.5 GeV, with LGT preferring the higher range. The 1-- should be visible in e+e- but with a suppressed width. (Hybrid models for different reasons predict ycc(r=0) = 0, suppressing Gee .) Decays (flux-tube model and f-t decay model): Dominant open-charm decay modes are of S+P type, not S+S. (e.g. DD1 not DD or DD*). n.b. p1(1600) ->p h’ argues against this model. LGT(UKQCD): Closed-charm modes like cc-H -> cc + light mesons are large! (Shown for bb-H; (bb) is preferentially P-wave, and “light mesons” = scalar pp.)

  32. E.I.Ivanov et al. (E852) PRL86, 3977 (2001). p1(1600) The (only) strong JPC-exotic H candidate signal. p-p ->p-h’p p1(1600) 1-+ exotic reported in p-h’ S+S, not S+P ! ph’is a nice channel because nn couplings are weak for once (e.g. the a2(1320) noted here). The reported exotic P-wave is dominant!

  33. Strong Widths: 3P0 Decay Model 43S1 78 [MeV] 41S0 61 [MeV] 4S 43(15) [MeV] A warning about hybrid = S+P modes: Theor. decay BFs of the 43S1 ccy(4415). DD DD* D*D* DD0* DD1 DD1’ DD2* D*D0* DsDs DsDs* Ds*Ds* DsDs0*

  34. Y(4415) A cc state, but the main mode (thy.) is S+P, not S+S ! n.b. PDG says the 4415 decays mainly to “hadrons”. Expt BFs needed! (As for all states above open-charm thresholds.) Y(4415) partial widths [MeV] (3P0 decay model): DD = 0.4 DD* = 2.3 D*D* = 15.8 [multiamp.] DsDs= 1.3 DsDs*= 2.6 Ds*Ds*= 0.7 [m] New S+P mode calculations: DD1= 30.6 [m] <- MAIN MODE!!! DD1’= 1.0 [m] DD2*=23.1 D*D0*= 0.0 Y(4415) - >DD1 amplitudes: (3P0 decay model): 3S1 = 0 <- !!! (HQET) 3D1 = + 0.093

  35. An “industrial application” of the y(4415). Sit “slightly upstream”, at ca. 4435 MeV, and you should have a copious source of D*s0(2317). (Assuming it is largely cs3P0.)

  36. Summary, conclusions, suggestions, re expt: X(3943), Y(3943), Z(3931) and Y(4260) … 1. X(3943) as 31S0hc’’, cc ? DD*-only checks, G may be a bit small.. Just measure J P !!! (also for Y and Z!) 2. If Y(3943) is the 23P1c1’, one expects a large DD* mode, and no DD. 3. gg -> Z(3931) -> DD and DD* if c2’. …

  37. Summary, conclusions, suggestions, re expt: Y(4260) … 4. Y(4260) as hybrid? No new cc 1- - expected near this mass: if it exists it’s already something unusual. Theory folklore says hybrids prefer S+P modes, UKQCD says c + light meson(s) may be large. Best approach would be to search for it in all accessible open charm and closed charm modes. e+e--> DD, DD*, D*D*, DD0*, DD1*; J/y pp, any other (cc) + light meson mode. (Close and Page, hep-ph/0507199v2, PLB628, 215 (2005) gives a detailed list of modes)

  38. Summary, conclusions, suggestions, re expt (cont.): X(3943), Y(3943), Z(3931) … 5. E1 radiative transitions from 1- - cc states: You canfind all three 23PJ cc states using y(4040) and y(4160) -> gDD, gDD*. e.g. All three E1 rad BFs of the y(4040) are ca. few * 10-4. These could show whether the X,Y,Z (3.9) are 2P cc as speculated. The End

More Related