60 likes | 193 Views
Improved Cross Area Review ICAR. Joel M. Halpern < jhalpern@megisto.com > Mark Allman < mallman@icir.org > w/ Alex Zinin icar@ietf.org. Introduction. This working group is to: Provide a place for discussing cross area review Propose useful experiments in early and late stage review
E N D
Improved Cross Area ReviewICAR Joel M. Halpern <jhalpern@megisto.com> Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> w/ Alex Zinin icar@ietf.org
Introduction This working group is to: • Provide a place for discussing cross area review • Propose useful experiments in early and late stage review • Select recommended BCPs on review techniques
Administrative • Email: icar@ietf.org • subscribe: icar-request@ietf.org • We are setting up a web page and roundup issues tracker • Please name all relevant drafts as: • Draft-<person>-icar-<draftname>-nn.txt
Agenda • Introduction (done) • Existing Experience • SIRS - 10 minutes, Dave Crocker • MIB Doctors – 10 minutes, Bert Wijnen • Security Directorate – 10 minutes, Steve Bellovin • Routing Directorate – 10 minutes, Alex Zinin • What Constitutes Good Review – 20 Minutes • Number of reviews? Skill set of reviewers? Focus? Depth? Breadth?
More Agenda • What Early Review Mechanisms? 30 minutes • Draft-carpenter-solution-sirs-02.txt • Draft-allman-problem-wg-revcomm-00.txt • Draft-ietf-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt • What incentives for early review? 20 minutes • What Structures for late reviews? 30 minutes (and what properties should these have) • Draft-zinin-early-review-00.txt • Draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel-00.txt (section 4.2)
What Constitutes Good Review? For early reviews: • Is the number of reviews significant? • Is it important to get a range of skill sets among the reviewers? (Or the focus / interests of the reviewers?) • Is there a measure of the depth of review? • Is there a measure of breadth of cross area coverage? Do these also apply to late / formal reviews?