1 / 6

Improved Cross Area Review ICAR

Improved Cross Area Review ICAR. Joel M. Halpern < jhalpern@megisto.com > Mark Allman < mallman@icir.org > w/ Alex Zinin icar@ietf.org. Introduction. This working group is to: Provide a place for discussing cross area review Propose useful experiments in early and late stage review

veata
Download Presentation

Improved Cross Area Review ICAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improved Cross Area ReviewICAR Joel M. Halpern <jhalpern@megisto.com> Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> w/ Alex Zinin icar@ietf.org

  2. Introduction This working group is to: • Provide a place for discussing cross area review • Propose useful experiments in early and late stage review • Select recommended BCPs on review techniques

  3. Administrative • Email: icar@ietf.org • subscribe: icar-request@ietf.org • We are setting up a web page and roundup issues tracker • Please name all relevant drafts as: • Draft-<person>-icar-<draftname>-nn.txt

  4. Agenda • Introduction (done) • Existing Experience • SIRS - 10 minutes, Dave Crocker • MIB Doctors – 10 minutes, Bert Wijnen • Security Directorate – 10 minutes, Steve Bellovin • Routing Directorate – 10 minutes, Alex Zinin • What Constitutes Good Review – 20 Minutes • Number of reviews? Skill set of reviewers? Focus? Depth? Breadth?

  5. More Agenda • What Early Review Mechanisms? 30 minutes • Draft-carpenter-solution-sirs-02.txt • Draft-allman-problem-wg-revcomm-00.txt • Draft-ietf-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt • What incentives for early review? 20 minutes • What Structures for late reviews? 30 minutes (and what properties should these have) • Draft-zinin-early-review-00.txt • Draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel-00.txt (section 4.2)

  6. What Constitutes Good Review? For early reviews: • Is the number of reviews significant? • Is it important to get a range of skill sets among the reviewers? (Or the focus / interests of the reviewers?) • Is there a measure of the depth of review? • Is there a measure of breadth of cross area coverage? Do these also apply to late / formal reviews?

More Related