Understanding Punishment and Sentencing in Criminal Justice System

1. Punishment & Sentencing • The Criminal Justice system aims to solve three basic questions: • What conduct is criminal? • What determines guilt? • What should be done with the guilty?

2. Douglas County Court

3. The Goals of Punishment • Retribution – punishment inflicted on a person who has infringed on the rights of others and so deserves to be penalized • Deterrence • General – members of the general public, on observing the punishment of others, will conclude that the costs of crime outweigh the benefits • Specific – targets the decisions and behavior of offenders who have already been convicted

4. The Goals of Punishment • Incapacitation – assumes that society can keep an offender from committing further crimes by detention in prison or by execution • Selective Incapacitation – targets offenders who repeat certain kinds of crimes • Rehabilitation – the goal of restoring a convicted offender to a constructive place in society through some form of training or therapy

5. Standard jail cell

6. Forms of the Criminal Sanction • Incarceration • Good Time – a reduction of an inmate’s prison sentence, at the discretion of prison administrator, for good behavior or participation in vocational, educational or treatment programs • Truth-in-Sentencing – laws that require offenders to serve a substantial proportion of their prison sentence before being released on parole • Indeterminate Sentences

7. Forms of the Criminal Sanction • Probation – a sentence an offender serves in the community under supervision • Shock Probation – an offender is released after a period of incarceration and resentenced to probation • Death

8. Three Basic Sentencing Structures • Indeterminate Sentence – a period, set by a judge, that specifies a minimum and a maximum time to be served in prison • Determinate Sentence – fixes the term of imprisonment at a specific period • Mandatory Sentence – requires that a certain penalty be imposed and carried out for convicted offenders who meet certain criteria

9. Key Supreme Court Decisions • Furman v. Georgia – the death penalty, as administered, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment • Considering petitioners’ cases, death penalty cruel and unusual punishment • Gregg v. Georgia- death penalty laws are constitutional; death not inappropriate sentence in all situations

10. Charlie Manson

11. Key Supreme Court Decisions • McCleskey v. Kemp – rejection of a challenge of Georgia’s death penalty on grounds of racial discrimination • Atkins v. Arizona – execution of the mentally retarded is unconstitutional • Ring v. Arizona – juries must decide whether or not a convicted murderer will receive the death penalty

12. Execution of the Mentally Ill • Ford v. Wainwright – the 8th Amendment prohibits the execution of the insane • Is it moral to treat a person to make them sane enough to execute?

13. Execution of Juveniles • Minimum age is determined by the state • Permitted by 23 of the 38 death penalty states • Thompson v. Oklahoma – the court would not allow a 15 year old offender to be executed • Stanford v. Kentucky & Wilkins v. Missouri – the justices upheld the death sentences imposed on 16 & 17 year old offenders

14. The Issue of Effective Counsel • Strickland v. Washington – the Supreme Court ruled that defendants in capital cases had the right to representation that meets an objective standard of reasonableness • Wiggins v. Smith – the court declared that an inexperienced lawyer failed to provide adequate representation

15. Death-Qualified Juries • Witherspoon v. Illinois – potential jurors who have general objections to the death penalty cannot be automatically excluded from jury service in capital cases • Juries are likely to lean toward believing defendant is guilty and imposing death penalty by the very process of undergoing death qualification

16. Debating the Death Penalty • Against • The death penalty is not a deterrent • It is wrong for the government to kill • The death penalty is applied in a discriminatory way • Innocent people have been sentenced

17. Debating the Death Penalty • For • The death penalty is a deterrent • The death penalty prevents crime • Justice requires that a person who murders be executed • The death penalty is less expensive

18. Debating the Death Penalty Against Studies show death penalty is not a deterrent Sometimes execute the wrong person Often a long time between crime and punishment Very expensive

19. The Sentencing Process • Judges have the responsibility of imposing sentences • Sentencing does not always involve applying clear-cut principles • Judges can combine forms of punishment • Influenced by: • Administrative context of the courts • Attitudes and values of the judge • Presentence report • Sentencing guidelines

20. Judge handing out sentence

21. Sentence must be fair to all

22. The courts must take into account the needs of the defendant and at the same time take into the account the needs of society. The penalty cannot by too harsh that is violates the 8th amendment. It cannot be too lenient that society is not protected or served.

23. The Administrative Context of the Courts • Misdemeanor Courts • Assembly-Line Justice • Overloaded and allot minimal time to each case • Assume the defendant is guilty and that the vast majority of defendants will plead guilty • Felony Courts • Atmosphere is more formal • Exchange relationships among the courtroom actors facilitate plea bargains

24. Attitudes and Values of Judges • Attitudes concerning the offender’s blameworthiness • Protection of the Community • Practical Implications of the Sentence

25. Presentence Report • Written by the probation officer after an investigation into the convicted person’s life • Also assists in the classification of probationers, prisoners and parolees • In some states the probation officer can make judgments • Shifts partial responsibility to probation department

26. Probation officers

27. Sentencing Guidelines • Indicate to judges the expected sanction for particular types of offenses • Intended to limit discretion • Range of sentencing options is based on the seriousness of the crime and on the criminal history of the offender • Grid system that judges may deviate from depending on aggravating or mitigating circumstances

28. Who Gets The Harshest Punishment? • Research on racial disparities is inconclusive • Some studies show that there is a high cost of being black, young and male • Other studies do not support this assumption • Relationship between race and sentencing is complex and that judges should consider specific characteristics

29. Wrongful Convictions • Little attention is given to those who are convicted, but are innocent • DNA has increased the number of people convicted and later exonerate • Ideals of justice are never served by wrongful conviction