1 / 3

Please go to next page

Fig 1. Ambient aerosols observations in Oct and Nov 2002. Please go to next page. Fig 2. Rad-Res-Nephs comparison at Fazenda with ambient aerosols and NaCl particles. Please go to next page. TSI nephs observed lower values than Rad Res neph Zeppo which was operated at ambient conditions.

venus
Download Presentation

Please go to next page

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fig 1. Ambient aerosols observations in Oct and Nov 2002. Please go to next page

  2. Fig 2. Rad-Res-Nephs comparison at Fazenda with ambient aerosols and NaCl particles. Please go to next page

  3. TSI nephs observed lower values than Rad Res neph Zeppo which • was operated at ambient conditions. • 2. Total scattering of TSI-neph-IAG is 20% lower than TSI-neph-LFA at 550 nm. • 3. It is interesting that there is no offset in the slops, only factor is applicable. • 4. Rad-Research-Nephs were calibrated and intercompared at fazenda • in parallel configurations (Fihure2). The results shown above are after • applying all the corrections i.e. (calibration with zero air and CO2; • intercomparison with ambient air and NaCl particles, • the truncation correction based on the Guyan et al 2003). Using all the • analysis an offset of 1(Mm-1) is added in zeppo observations • and all the data are increase by 2% i.e. a factor of 1.02. • 5. The the Rad-research-Neph-Zeppo (sampling ambient aerosols) observes • higher than the Rad-Res-neph-Groucho (sampling dry aerosols with • impactor cut off at about 1 micro meter). This difference is expected. • We need to resolve • Why the TSI nephs show lower values than Rad Res neph zeppo. • Why the two TSI are not matching (20% different in each other). • The calibration data for the two TSI nephs can help to resolve these issues.

More Related